When I was a child, I often heard people of the older generation say that when they were young, "the children of the poor were early home", it was very admirable, but when they heard this sentence again when they grew up, they suddenly felt very disgusted. At first, I couldn't figure it out, and it wasn't until later that I understood that when I heard this sentence as a child, the emphasis was on "early home", and when I grew up, I heard this sentence, focusing on "the children of poor families".
In the generation of parents, the social and economic development is slow, the economic conditions at home are naturally average, and the phrase "the children of the poor have long been in charge" are also deeply remembered. The implication is that the children of poor families are born to reduce the burden on the family and understand early on the difficulty of life and the hardships of their parents.
In the general perception of society, "early home" may be a good thing for the education of children, because children who grow up in such families know how to work harder, are more considerate of taking care of others, and want to turn over and be themselves. But to a certain extent, the child's soul will also be hurt to a certain extent.
But does "the children of the poor have been homemakers" necessarily a good education? I don't think so.
"The children of the poor are already homemakers" although this is a true portrayal of real life. But on another level, the family is irresponsible to the child and irresponsible to itself.
Because life is unstable, you never know which tomorrow and accident will come first, you can only live the life of the present, take one step at a time and see a life.
Children of poor families, especially those who are single parents or have experienced major setbacks, are often psychologically precocious than the children of rich families, and they will also start a family early, marry and have children, and share the burden of the family. Such days seem like a daily routine, but in real life, we know that such a result is just one more person to live with you and live a difficult life with you, plus a child, life will be more difficult.
Compared with the wealthier families, children with rich living conditions are much happier. They don't suffer from gain and loss, and they don't worry about having a meal or a meal. Life can be relaxed, have more time to plan future life, further education and learning, personal skills improvement, broaden horizons. When setbacks or changes come, their long-term developed character and ability can also be easily solved.
In fact, the children of poor families do not have to be in charge of the family early, and it is not a bad thing to grow up slowly. A child's childhood should not be a life full of wealth, rice, oil and salt, but an innocent and happy growth.