laitimes

It is difficult to distinguish whether the Kangxi testament is true or false, and the mystery of Yongzheng's succession to the throne for thousands of years is a conspiracy designed by Yin Chan?

Yongzheng was a ruler of the Qing Dynasty, and he was a Ming emperor who laid the foundation for the prosperity of the Qianlong period. His political achievements have been widely praised by posterity, but at the same time, the cause of his death and succession have also become the topic of discussion after dinner. His succession has always been suspected by the world, and many people believe that he tampered with Kangxi's will, and even said that the crown prince that Kangxi valued at that time was the fourteenth son of the emperor, Yin Yu.

It is difficult to distinguish whether the Kangxi testament is true or false, and the mystery of Yongzheng's succession to the throne for thousands of years is a conspiracy designed by Yin Chan?

Now that this testament is difficult to distinguish between true and false, there are many opinions in the academic circles, and Yongzheng's succession to the throne has become a mystery for eternity, is this really a conspiracy carefully designed by the fourth son of the emperor, Yin Chan? For Yin Chan to tamper with the will, this is just a folk rumor and is very untrustworthy. Many ancient emperors, whether they were born, or succeeded to the throne, or did spectacular things in their lives, people would give him a mythical color, in order to mythologize this person.

It is difficult to distinguish whether the Kangxi testament is true or false, and the mystery of Yongzheng's succession to the throne for thousands of years is a conspiracy designed by Yin Chan?

Zhu Yuanzhang once created a kind of "mythical" holy will, and the first sentence of each holy will was: Fengtian carries the transport, the emperor commands. The implication is that this holy will is the fate of heaven, and the heavens arranged for the emperor to do so, so the emperor did it. Therefore, whether Zhu Yuanzhang joined the rebel army or Yongzheng tampered with the will, it was given a layer of mythology. It is difficult to distinguish whether the Kangxi testament is true or false, and the mystery of Yongzheng's succession to the throne for thousands of years is a conspiracy designed by Yin Chan?

It is difficult to distinguish whether the Kangxi testament is true or false, and the mystery of Yongzheng's succession to the throne for thousands of years is a conspiracy designed by Yin Chan?

Some people say that Yin Chan only made his will public three days after his father's death, so he had enough time to tamper with it. He even said that he changed the fourteenth son of the lineage to the fourth son, that is to say, he changed the tenth to Yu, but is this possible? In ancient times, the writing was actually not as simplified as it is now, they were all written in traditional characters, and the traditional characters in Yu were: Then, how to change this?

It is difficult to distinguish whether the Kangxi testament is true or false, and the mystery of Yongzheng's succession to the throne for thousands of years is a conspiracy designed by Yin Chan?

Moreover, the emperor's will is generally written as "the fourteenth son of the emperor, or the fourth son of the emperor", there will be a prince in the middle, so if according to the world's saying, after changing the will, it is "the fourth son of the emperor", which is obviously unreadable. In addition, which prince is located, the name of this prince will definitely appear in the will, and Yin Chan and Yin Yu are completely different.

It is difficult to distinguish whether the Kangxi testament is true or false, and the mystery of Yongzheng's succession to the throne for thousands of years is a conspiracy designed by Yin Chan?

In addition to the above, the Kangxi Emperor's will is divided into two types, Chinese and Manchu, even if the Chinese can be changed, then manchu is more complicated, how to change it? Moreover, the people of the world only said that Yin Chan tampered with the Chinese language, not that the Manchu language was tampered with, so this statement is obviously not valid. Is this testament real? Opinions vary, but Yin Chan's succession to the throne is obviously not obtained by tampering with the will.

It is difficult to distinguish whether the Kangxi testament is true or false, and the mystery of Yongzheng's succession to the throne for thousands of years is a conspiracy designed by Yin Chan?

Yin Chan was able to sit on the throne, in fact, he exchanged it for his forbearance, after all, his father hated the princes most before he died. Therefore, when other princes were vying for the crown prince, he obediently stayed by Kangxi's side and shared his worries, but in private, he also fought openly and secretly. Kangxi attached the most importance to feelings, so seeing that Yin Chan could be so patient, he began to attach importance to this son, and even often let him do some more important things.

It is difficult to distinguish whether the Kangxi testament is true or false, and the mystery of Yongzheng's succession to the throne for thousands of years is a conspiracy designed by Yin Chan?

Perhaps this is the case, before his death, he ceded the throne to Yin Chan, that is, the later Yongzheng Emperor, and finally he really did not live up to the expectations of his father, and brought the prosperity of the Qing dynasty to the prosperity of the governance of the Qing Dynasty, and the prosperity of the Country.

Read on