To this day, when we look back at history, we always come to some different conclusions. When people have more and more historical information, they will have questions about the same thing. What are the real reasons for some of the advocacy we are seeing now? Is it just because of right and wrong, failure and success? Many people agree that history is just a little girl dressed up, and it has no voice in itself. But when people in later generations look back on history, they will certainly have a more comprehensive understanding than those at that time, and this is certain.
Based on this foundation, we recommend a movie today, "Boy in Striped Pajamas.". But don't get me wrong, I don't want to share with you the core of the sadness that this film shows to the audience, but through this core, we can look at the attitude of the Jews after the world war at that time, and the differences in their attitudes towards world war II today, so that we can think about many World War II movies with Jews as the core, or whether the core expressed in this part of the film is actually a world crown or an attitude, whether this attitude is worth advocating, this attitude is worth advocating, this is a question.
"The Boy in the Striped Pajamas" is a very sadistic movie, naturally, this movie creates a directly stimulating look for us through an absurd and real ending, which has become a condition for the film to be a classic to a certain extent. After removing this perception, let's look at the film, which is a small episode about a policy of extermination against Jews during World War II. The protagonists in the film are children, and all the adults are foils. However, through the communication between children and the final outcome, our emotions will be greatly mobilized, and then the feelings of resentment against the Nazis will arise and will not be broken for a long time. This is the direct look and feel of the film.
The indirect perception of the film is the condemnation of the crimes committed by the German Nazis during World War II, and this condemnation expounds a core, that is, harming others will harm themselves. The German policy of extermination of the Jews actually ended up hurting themselves. To kill Jewish children is to deprive Jews of their future, and to deprive Jews of their futures is in fact indirectly to deprive German children of their futures. Judging from the ending of this film, the core of the film is to expound such a point of view, and such a point of view, as an audience, will naturally be incomparably agreeable.
However, when we enter the real history and look at the real attitude of the Jews towards Germany, this view seems to be wandering. Hitler's Nazi Party did not begin with a genocidal policy of genocide against the Jews. Naturally, he did not start by setting up concentration camps and then massacring Jews en masse. Throughout World War II, the German Nazi policy toward the Jews was a policy of boiling frogs, unconsciously slowly tightening the rope around their necks, but in the process, the Jews had too many opportunities to fight back, thus declaring themselves completely at odds with the German Nazis, but they did not do so from beginning to end.
Resistance, especially in war, is a very normal act, but appeasement throughout, and the repeated illusions about the Nazis, which led to the mass murder of Jews, were never seriously considered. The Nazi anti-Semitic policy developed gradually, beginning not as a massacre in concentration camps, but as a restriction on Jews from doing business or as soldiers. Under these restrictions, the citizenship of the Jews in Germany was affected, yet at this time they did not realize that this was the beginning rather than the end. With the expansion of World War II, anti-Semitism in Germany continued to rise. The Jews were gradually cornered in a step-by-step compromise. At this time, the Jews still did not resist.
People's desires cannot be fully satisfied, and those who have been bullied will be bullied if they dare not resist, and any compromise with the perpetrators will only encourage their arrogance. So the Nazis finally killed the killers after the Jews were forced into a corner. This partly reflects the cruelty and dehumanization of the Nazis, but on the other hand, the attitude of the Jews to persecution is also very psychedelic.
To this day, we see too many film and television works about the persecution of Jews during World War II in various forms, these works have different forms, but in fact there is only one theme, that is, the German Nazis exterminated humanity, the European Jews were miserable, and the cruelty to the Jews was a crime against the entire human race. However, no one has seriously thought about a problem, only promises do not dare to resist beforehand, and afterwards it is only Bo sympathetic and condemned, what is the significance of such an attitude toward the world?
Why not resist? This may be an eternal topic, but the thinking under this topic is the problem that should really be worthy of our attention. The Jews, who hold absolute position in the cultural sphere, can turn their history over and over again, but what is the point of saying so much? Is it for everyone to remember the crimes of the Nazis and then develop sympathy for the Jews, or for everyone to remember former criminals and never forgive them? What is the use of these shouts? When the next Nazi-like demon is born, will history be replayed?
We look back on war in order to cherish peace, and cherishing peace means that we must have the ability to dare to resist and dare to eliminate all hidden dangers of war. To understand Nazi atrocities is to be a wake-up call in the face of the same situation in the future, and excessive mercy for atrocities is often the trigger for them. The Jews could not cry Hitler, nor could they move the Nazis, and I hope that all peace-loving people will not forget.
……
Hello and goodbye