Production \ Xu Liutang
"A Brief Copy of the Theory of Entering the Ming Dynasty" is from the Dunhuang Mogao Caves, which was later plundered overseas, and is now in the National Library of France, No. P2063. This is an isolated ancient book of Buddhism, and the text has been lost for a long time.
According to Mr. Huang Zheng of the School of Fine Arts of Nanjing Normal University, "The Compilation of fragments of the Fragments of the Fazang Dunhuang Cursive Manuscript P2063 Pure Eye "Brief Transcription of the Theory of Entering the Right Theory of The Ming Dynasty" ("Art Hundred Schools", No. 2, 2014), the collation and research of this volume was first compiled and studied by Mr. Wuyi Shangbang (1914-2005), a monk and scholar of the Pure Land Zhenzong Hongan Monastery of Japanese Buddhism, and his full-text transcript was included in the "Continuation of the Tibetan Classics" together with the "Later Neglect of the Theory of Entering the Right Theory of The Ming Dynasty". Mr. Huang Zheng refers to the research results of Wuyi Shangbang and Mr. Shen Jianying, and his interpretation is more accurate than the previous one.
In order to make the printing effect clearer, I lightened the background color and divided the entire volume into fifty-six pages with eight lines and one page; on the right side of each page, I marked the interpretation word by word against the "Swastika Continuing Tibetan Classic" and the "Fazang Dunhuang Cursive Manuscript P2063 Net Eye "Transcription of the Theory of Entering the Right Theory of Ming".
I hate watermarked web images the most, so the information I share is not watermarked. In addition, in order to make the page look neat, so the page after cutting out the resulting half-pulled words to be removed, this cursive scroll word interspersed between the lines, if the reader is not comfortable with this, you can refer to the complete volume on the Internet.
For the convenience of the reader, the full text of the explanatory text is attached to the figure.
After this volume, there is still "The Aftermath of the Theory of Entering the Right Theory of Enlightenment", which is currently being proofread and interpreted, and it is estimated that it will be issued in two weeks, and it will be notified in advance.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
54
55
56
Interpretation of the "Brief Copy of the Theory of Enlightenment into the Right"
Essentials. Self-□ (sexual) □
The most popular. □
Most will explain this "Treatise". Slightly three doors. First □ (min)
The title of the Treatise; the dictates that the three points explain the □
Tibetan religions are broad about birth and death, nirvana, and cause and effect. If only it could be □
The inner righteousness of the tao, so it is known as the inner mingya. Both are clear. It is said that it can be □ (standing),
A model for destroying evil and showing righteousness. To live, to understand the cause. The □ (mysterious) principle of the Qizhen Sect
also. Three declarations. It refers to the flow of male and female voices, non-male and non-female, or ming eight turns
Interpretation, or in the name of the Six Interpretations, broadly publicized, trumpet statement also. The four doctors are clear,
It is said that the cause, the phase of the disease, and the prescription medicine for rescue, so the name of the doctor Fang Mingye. The five are ingenious,
It is said that the law of craftsmanship, the book counts the number of prints. Widely described the matter, so it is known
Gong Qiao Ming also. This Treatise is also taken by The Five Mings in the Middle. The second interpreter of the title of the Treatise. This "Treatise" has two names: one is "Cause Ming", that is
It is the common name of the various theories, and the two "enter into the right reason" . This is the alternative name of this Treatise. The one who speaks the name. Dan (but)
There are always more than a hundred western inner and outer paths, all of which are established and broken, and the general name is "Inming".
Although it is an alias among the five ming, it is still a common name in the one ming, and it is also because of the ming.
If "sound is impermanent", why do you know impermanence? The three equal causes are impermanence, so
So also. And "because" the speaker, the one who treats it, the principle of impermanence should be treated as the cause of the cause. Zongzhi
wisdom. Because of the cause of life also. Those who say "cause" today have two causes: one is taking the cause, and the other is manifesting nothing
Common sense; two both take the cause of life, the theory of the enemy, the solution of the sect, the wisdom of the cause. Cause, cause. Each has its own
Three. It is called "speech", "righteousness", and "wisdom". Interpret these three causes, as well as the clear and the right. As described in "Sparse". Therefore, the saying "cause" also. speech
"Ming" is the two interpretations of the West: a cloud "cause" is "Ming", so the name "Cause Ming", that is, holding the karmic interpretation also, by cause energy
Impermanence is not the case. Eryun is called "Inming" because of "Zong" Ming. That is, according to the Lord's interpretation also. There are two of these
Dade each inherits the three Tibetan interpretations differently. Yiyun "impermanence", "effect", "wisdom", clear understanding of the sect, is the cause of the sect
Ming, hence the name "Because of Ming". The "impermanence" of a cloud is originally obvious, named after the cause and effect, and the cause is obvious
Zong Ming. Hence the name "Inming". Now the total is unified into one, Xie Yun: the wisdom of the sect, the understanding is the genus
The cause of life is also the principle of impermanence. Obviously it belongs to the cause of the ming also. That is, manifest birth and two fruits
Ming is a genus of birth, two causes of Ming also. Q: "Yu can also be enlightened, and the enemy is born and the intellect." why
It goes without saying 'metaphorically'. Is it said 'Inming'? Answer: "For it is its Master, and the metaphor is its help." In the name of the Lord,
It goes without saying itself. He also explained: "If the word 'cause and effect' is also a metaphor, the two parables are both the cause of the Lord;
If the words 'metaphor' does not reveal the three phases, the second metaphor is only interpreted after the two phases. The person who says 'into the right' is also an alias,
'Entering' means 'facilitating enlightenment'. Those who speak "righteously" have three interpretations in the Ming Interpretation: One Cloud Chenna
The name of the "Great Cause and Ming Theory" is "Zhengli Gate". Why is it called "The Gate of Righteousness"? Western Xieyun: Zong is
Its righteousness is revered, and it is thought to be the right reason; because it is its reason, it is the right reason, and the sect is the reason
Therefore, Yu is its door, and it is possible to manifest the true sect. Xie Yun again: The cause of wisdom is positive, and it is corrected by him
The cause of righteousness is reason, righteousness is reason, and reason is reason; cause of speech is the door, and righteousness is the cause. His Treatise
Guangming Zhengli Gate, hence the name "Zhengli Gate" also. The words of the present Shang Karma Lord for the "True Theory" are difficult to understand,
Therefore, the creation of "On": If you study the "Treatise", you can realize the right reason. The "Treatise" sentence, so the words into the righteousness also. One
Cloud: By studying this "Treatise". That is, it is possible to understand the correct principles interpreted in the "Great Cause and Clear Theory", so the clouds enter the correct reason. One Cloud:
By studying this Treatise, one can enlighten the Buddhas to the righteousness of impermanence, emptiness, and so on with the causes of the three phases
Cloud "into the right reason" also. This solution, the other two, and is the three Tibetan attendants of the Western Interpretation. Yu Xie as such
Explained in the "Sparse", this is not an elaboration. Those who say "Shang Karma Luo Lord Bodhisattva", "Shang Karma Lord" as in the Shu
Interpretation, "bodhisattva" person has three interpretations: a cloud "bodhi" person, this cloud "enlightenment" also; "satan" person, this cloud "sentient" also,
It is said that the bodhisattva is the state of being desired, and the state of salvation is the state of salvation, and it is from the state of being
The Bodhisattva of Eryun has a sentient bodhi, hence the name "Feeling Sentient Beings", that is, from what is sought and what can be sought
The three "satans" take "bravery" as the righteousness, which means to be brave and seek bodhichitta, that is, to follow
Realm and use as the name also. For those who speak of bodhisattvas, the words "mention" and "埵" are omitted.
In the interpretation of the second judgment of the brother, it is as wide as the "Sparse": As far as the "Sparse" is concerned, there is no one, which slightly helps to explain the cloud. "Noritsu"
There are four kinds of meanings in the Western interpretation: one is true and can stand, that is, three branches are also without fault, and two are true
It seems to be able to stand, saying that the decision is also in violation of the decision; with three phases, the name is true. is the enemy
Obedient, the name seems to be the same. Three seems to be able to stand, saying that the remainder is uncertain and contradictory, and metaphorically
Too much is also; four seems to be able to stand, said four is not successful, because too is also. The patriarchal cause is exactly
The Lord of The Standing. If this phase is queuing, it is similar to the standing. now. He who speaks. But (53) yes
The four really can stand also. The latter three are similar to the receipt. Among those who can be broken, there are also four kinds of righteousness: one can really be
Broken, that is, the deeds have been wronged, the self-measure is not lost, so the words can really be broken; the second truth seems to be able to break, that is
When it is rebuked, it is called true, and it is inevitable that it is ashamed, so it is called similar, which is contrary to the decision
Three seem to be able to break, it is said that there is no excessive rebuke, the name is similar, such as the similarity of the work, etc.; the fourth is similar
Seems to be able to break, said no excessive rebuke, the name is similar, self-measure is more lost, the name is similar,
This is similar to the law and so on is also. Question: "The text of the Treatise says: 'The sect waits for many words, and the name is Noritsu.' '
That is, the manifest cause is its ability to stand. Why is wisdom and righteousness not able to stand up?" Answer: "There is Xie Yun: Wisdom."
The cause is the beginning, the cause of speech is the middle, the righteous cause is the end, and the beginning and the end can be shown in the middle
Standing also. Present XieYun: Speaks from wisdom, interprets righteousness, and benefits from reason, and is true three
Species can be named. Words speak louder than words. The "Treatise" is partial to it. How do you know? And as before the righteousness was established, though
If there is wisdom and righteousness, its sect has not yet been established; when it is spoken against the enemy, its righteousness is accomplished. Therefore, it is known that words are because of the covenant
Katsu said also. Question: "How can we know the 'wisdom' and 'righteousness' and be able to stand up?" Answer: "Although the following explanation can be established."
There are three phases in the body, which are both righteous causes, so wisdom and righteousness are also its ability to stand. And quasi-"yes
On the Law, there are eight of the can-stand, and the present and the two quantities have been included in it, so the zhizhi cause is also the no-liya.
And in "Shu", Yun: The ancient master always gathers together with all the laws, self-nature, and differences, and is established.
In the middle, do not follow your own wishes, take one from nature and one difference, and unite them into a sect. Sectarian Unity,
He is always in the middle of the law, and the combination is not another reason, so it is able to stand. Chen Na is based on the metaphor of Zongwang, so it is what it is
stand. If this is the solution, the ancient teachers and righteous people may not be able to do so. How can it be all about nature, all of it, all of it?
The place where the sect is established, that is, one can be established? And if it is lawful for those who can be established, the place of the sect is established,
For the sake of merging into separation? If he who agrees with him, how can he stand? If he says something away, what is the benefit? enter
Retreating is a mistake, so I know that I cannot make this solution. Present Solution: Ancient Masters Speak voice and nothing
Often, the original is not separated, the enemy theory is incomprehensible, and the false claim is constant. The present commentators are based on Pi Zongyun
Manifest and reasonable, the words that can be manifested, the name can be established, and the righteousness that is manifested is established. Chenna
Cloud: "Sound is impermanent, but manifest, not righteous." It is also established by the metaphor of cause. Not really
Noritsuya. Question: "If the ancient master saves his words: the words of the sect must be his ability to stand." The three words of the sect, the cause, and the metaphor follow one
Death. Cause is like cause, metaphor. The metaphor is that all who are not able to stand up must not be taken in three words, just like the rest of the words. Metaphor
If this salvation is done, how can it be explained? Answer: "The decision to violate the cloud should be made: Zong Zhi Ding Fei."
Words that can stand. The sect does not interpret the cause of the cause. Because if you can speak. Metaphorically, it is the interpretation of those who can speak
Causes, such as causes, metaphors. If the metaphor is difficult to cloud: the cause and the interpretation of the metaphor are able to stand, and the words that can be interpreted are also
It can be established; the interpretation of the sect is established, and the words of the interpretation are also established, so it cannot be said that the sect can also be established. ”
Question: "Having taken the cause of the cause and the metaphorical name of Nengli, why is the "Treatise" Cloud 'enlightened by the sect, the cause, and the metaphor (those who have questions)
Undeserved? Answer: "The cause of the sect and the yu kaixiao questioner have not been righteous, so there has been no past." ”
Question: "If Zong is not a person who can stand up, why can the interpretation of the "Treatise" be able to explain Zongye in three dimensions?" Answer: "For the solution."
What can be established. And he can stand for what he has established. Therefore, the solution can be immediately released and established. ”
Question: "Xie Zongyizhong, why not say that the extreme is different, the extreme is the law, but the words are extremely into the law,
Can it be different? Answer: "There are two interpretations, such as those listed in the Shu. Now more help to explain the cloud: what is said is very true
Those who are able to distinguish between the Dhamma and those who are able to distinguish between them are also called the Dhamma; those who speak extremely can be distinguished, then they are manifested and also known as the Dharma
other. Therefore, Zhang, slightly, and there are two people. Asked, "Why do you want to cite two of these two?"
Name yes? Answer: "There is a Dharma sect to rely on and a cause to rely on, and there is a Fa according to the Two Laws, and there is no other way."
The patriarchal law is afraid of abusing the law and distinguishing between the two. Therefore, I want to cite these two names also. Asked: "Sound."
If the one who can distinguish (the other) is extremely successful, that is, there is a consistent pole, and if the remainder is extremely successful, then there is
Non-acoustic energy can not be passed. What is the righteousness of the Saying? Answer: "There are two Western interpretations of the Ming Dynasty
Teacher, Yi Xieyun: Impermanence in sound is impermanence; impermanence in the afterlife is impermanence in total impermanence.
With the total combination, the total pole, so the other can also be achieved, so the sound theory can be different from the extreme. if
Logarithmic theory, immediate sound destruction, if there is always a difference, none of them are extremely successful. Ichishi Yun: Ru Li
Although it is not extremely successful, it will be extremely successful when it is established, and it will be extremely successful when it is said, so it is said to be extreme
Yes. If logarithm is destroyed, if it is present, it is not perfect. Therefore, it is extremely successful
Yan Yiyi said. Question: "The solution is due to the initial phase, but the law is established on top of the law."
The law is not the ultimate law, it is not the law that has the law and the law, and it is not the law that is the law
Yes? Answer: "None of them are for any reason." If there is a cause for the law, there is a law that does not succeed, and if you use this, there is a law
What is established can stand. If it is established as a sect and restored as a cause, it is neither of the two sides
also. If one uses the remaining laws to achieve this law, there is neither a law nor a cause of the initial phase. Yes
The Law becomes the Law, the one who does not become the cause, and the Law and the Law, and the Harmony are the Sects, and the two are the causes
Established. Compound refers to the law, and takes it as the cause, that is, what is established can be established, and it is also both
Not too much. If there is no cause in the law, the cause of the ultimate must be based on the pole
The law, the law of which is not mutually permissible, is therefore not dependent on it. So it can be done
The Law is not the ultimate Law, so the Theory of Reason And theOry cloud: "There is a law that does not become a law, and the law."
This is not a law, but it is formed by the law, if it is established in the law. 'In accordance with this Treatise,
Therefore, it is known that the law is also made into the law. Question: "If there is a law that cannot be achieved, why should those who have the law cause things?"
Birth ratio, Ephesian has the law to establish fire has faye? Answer: "Corresponding to the smoke here."
Righteousness, established in this context and corresponding to fire, is based on the law here and uses two kinds of correspondence
Righteousness, whether it is the law or the law, has never been done, and this righteousness is also said according to the Theory of Reason. "Q:
"Impermanent sound patriarchy, dharma and dharma merge into sects, and what is done is also the dharma of sound, why."
Don't take it as a cause? Answer: "Enemy arguments are not allowed." The law of non-separation and the union of the law are the sect, to
The law establishes its law, so don't take what you do as the cause. Q: "Why is the "Treatise" in the text of the same article) no
There is a cause in the general understanding, and there is no cause in the interpretation of the different products? Answer: "Because the same product is not everywhere, it is also."
Brother two phase, so the solution is not clear for a reason, the different products are all over the side is the third phase of the brother, so the solution is different
Say no cause. "Asked: "The Western masters interpret the meaning of 'breaking the hair', and one division takes the number of 'hard work' as diligence, and the first division
With the number of 'intentions' as diligence, who is righteous? Answer: "The one who 'intends' is right, and the one who understands the three natures is therefore." Pre-solution
If it is not correct, the bottle and so on should be diligent. And in the "Shu" to explain the nine sentences, the list of zong causes, and is Chen
That said, so the "Li Men" Yun: "If it is the nine kinds, the two odes are taken: constant, impermanent, diligent, constant, dwelling,
Firmness. Non-diligent, moving, unchanged, by the amount of nine. Measure, do, impermanence, do nature,
Smell, courage, impermanence, courage, no imitation, according to the constant and so on nine. Of these two odes, the first one is oded
The Nine Sects of Manifestation, the latter one praises the Nine Causes. Asked, "In these nine sentences, the brother has four sentences: 'Sound is constant, and what is done is nature.'" '
Therefore, its cause is that there is no such thing as the same product, there is no such thing as a different product bottle, and there is nothing in the rabbit horn, etc.
It should be the sixth sentence of the brother, why is it the fourth sentence of the disciple? If it is a disciple of the four sentences, Chen Na ho
Therefore, the meaning of breaking the ancient master's impermanence and impermanence? Self-reliant, rabbit horn, is a foreign product harvest,
If it is a different product, this cause should not be taken by the brother four sentences, and it is contrary to each other, how can it be explained? Answer: "If."
Tongyi has no body heterogeneous disciple six different, and now there is a body heterogeneous product said, so it is
Brother four sentences also. In the "Shu" sentence nine sentences, the second brother eight is the right cause of the harvest, the fourth brother six is
Contrary to the cause, the five sentences of yu are indeterminate, and this is also according to what Pi Chenna said, so the "Theory of Reason" Cloud:
If the names are said separately as cause, contradiction, and indetermination, this mantra says: "In the same being and two, in."
There is no cause for the difference; the name is contrary to this name, and the rest is uncertain. He asked, "Brother two and brother eight are the right causes."
And if the cause is not the same as the same, different from the other, it should be the cause of the Lord? Answer: "Because of the sect."
The law, the nine sentences of the fang theory, are not causes, and what is used is the same and the other, so it is not the second brother and the eighth
Received. Question: "The violation of the decision and the cause of the violation of the Law are also the second brother and the eighth brother."
What should be received, should be the cause of Yahweh? Answer: "It is precisely because it must be received by the second brother and the eighth brother, not the second."
The eight brothers are all because of the shooting, and this righteousness is not contrary to it. On the Cloud: 'It is impermanence and other causes. '
The cloud 'waits' for selflessness, suffering, and emptiness. Even the sound of the clouds has no self, no suffering, no emptiness, and the nature of the work,
It is not the case for the bottle, etc., and if the bottle is made of suffering, so is the work of the manifest voice
Suffering; or is it true that what the Noble Path and so on do is not suffering, and what is manifested is not bitterness? Even empty,
Not really. Therefore, it is known that this judgment may not be made, but it may be equal to those who must have three phases in it,
It is not possible to judge 'etc. ' suffering or emptiness. And the parable. "On the" Cloud: "It is said that the cause of the treatment is the same product decision."
Qualitatively sexual. "Shu" Xie Yun: "Everywhere is said to have the law, the obvious is to say, the cause is to be all over the patriarchal cause, the same."
The product is similar to this cause, and the non-predicate is the same name as the product. Decide who has sex, that is
The decision is legislative. "If this is the solution, I am afraid that it is not, because the same product can be revealed
on what was done. "Decide to have sex", the text is not obvious, how does the cloud know that it is impermanent on the bottle? If so
The following refers to the textual "if it is done", that is, the manifest cause is the same product, "see the impermanence of the other", that is
Decide to have sex. According to the next brother, who knows the necessity, this is not the case. Suspension is both predicate
"Yes" refers to the body, why is it said like a bottle? Therefore, I do not know that the following brother is also apparent. again
Zong Tongpin does not take impermanence, so why should it be taken because of Tongpin Yun? Again, this interpretation is violated
"The Theory of Theory", so the "Treatise" yun: "From this, it can be shown that because of the same product, there are different products everywhere."
None, not upside down. "In this article, it is known that the same metaphor is manifested, and the same product is determined to have sex; the different law is obvious
Because of the asexuality of foreign products. Therefore, it is known that this interpretation should not be made. Should xie yun: "If it is in the same place",
It is said that the bottle and other places also. "Explicit" means also. What is the obvious thing? It is called "apparent cause" also. What is the apparent cause? display
The second brother of the same product is bound to have sex also. If this interpretation is made, it does not violate the text of the Treatise, nor does it have anything as above
Lost also. In "Shu", someone explains that what is done with sound, impermanence can be made with the outer bottle, impermanence, impermanence,
However, those who take the energy as a metaphor are widely broken as described in the "Sparse". Now it is more difficult to help the clouds, if you can take it
The same as the metaphor, that is, the patriarchal law established by the cause and sound of the whole patriarchal law, should be the metaphor. if
It is a metaphor, that is, a metaphorical metaphor, etc., and there should be no difference. Also solution: Impermanence is both metaphorical
The body should be established and not over-received. If the word is called patriarchy when it is impermanent,
When the testimony of impermanence is made by the standing sound, the name is all over the patriarchal cause, that is, the impermanence made by the sound is the same bottle outward
When it was written, it was called a metaphor, so why is it difficult to say: there is no difference between the zongyin metaphor and so on? Again
When what is done, impermanent, just as the bottle is done, impermanent, its sound is impermanent, that is, it is extremely successful, and what is it
Whoever can't make a decision? That is, the same product should be fixed as the sexual body does not take the bottle on the work, impermanence,
Take the impermanence made on the bottle as the second phase of the disciple, which is the body of the same product, so it is known as a metaphor
The body does not take the same energy. In the three-dimensional form of knotted energy, the "Treatise" cloud: "If it is done, see the impermanence of the other."
Such as bottles, etc., are accompanied by words. "Shu" Xie Yun: "This knot is also metaphorical." What is done on the bottle
The sound is the same, so the well-known product; the bottle is impermanent, with this same product, so the cloud with the same product.
From the bottle impermanence to the same product, that is, the sound is impermanent, but also with the cause of the action. Or audible
The impermanence of the upper work follows the bottle, and the impermanence of the work is made, so the name is also with the same product. "Now more help to solve the cloud:
The metaphor of the same law is that the cause of manifestation is that there is a similar product of each sect, that is, the manifest cause
The same product must have sexual words. If this interpretation is made, it is manifested that the two brothers are in the same text and the same metaphor
And this conclusion is obedient, not obedient. On the clouds: "If it is always, see what is not done,
Like the Void, he is far from words. "Loosening the clouds:" This knot is a metaphor. Nothingness
Sect. Stay away from the causes of no-ritsu. "Now even more help to explain the cloud: the same metaphor is the cause of the manifestation."
Follow the same products of each case. Heterologous metaphors should reveal causes. Stay away from the Dzong's exotics. That is, it is different
Asexual also. Should be solved. The cause of the impermanence of the sect is far away from it. untie
Knot can stand in the middle of the wide gauge text. Shuzhong Q&A Cloud: "Question: Only three can stand, and there is no difference between righteousness." Yes
Standing only three, no same standing? Answer: "The same metaphor is smooth, there is no same help; different methods stop abuse, there is no difference."
Indiscriminate. So not class also. The Outer Path also has a metaphor for solipsism. Prove it in three senses. Repudiation
This meter also. For example, "Guangbai Theory". Question: "Although this is in line with the Text of the Hundred Treatises, it still violates the Mahayana Treatise. Asexual
On the disciple a volume of the solution 'no common no existence', the testimony Wenyun: "Not common ignorance,...... There is no room for it in the five senses
There is; there is nothing that can cure the cause; if there is a cure everywhere, there must be some cure. "In this article,
That is, it is only a heterogeneous metaphor, how to interpret it? Answer: "The theory of the teacher determines the difference, and it is not possible to make peace,
Orders do not contradict each other, in the two religions, and the Hundred Treatises are clear, so as not to violate the three phases of the cause. Mahayana
If there are two brothers and two phases, why not make the same Dharma metaphor? If there is no brother and two brothers who do not make a metaphor,
The cause of what is heard is only a metaphor, and its righteousness should be fulfilled. If there is no same product, there is no uncertainty
Passers-by, no same product, so the name of the same product is none. It is also a matter of uncertainty. Again, this parable comes first
To say that there is no cause, and to say that there is no sect later, is to be like the transgression in the metaphor, so why not make a parable
It is also too, so it is said in the "Hundred Treatises". Solution is similar to zongzhong. The ming ratio is contradictory. Cloud: 'And so
Sabata to mahayana clouds: Now the Dharmas are used alone to take the consequences of different bodies,'
If you have passed, you have not waited. That is, this doctrine violates the common ratio. Contrary to the common ratio, the cloud is now used by law
Take the fruit of the flow, and the world will take the cause, such as the past, the unequal. Asked, "'Alone and powerful', what is the form of Faye?" Masters
Xie Yun: Those who have passed the form and not said, and who do not take the past and the future and other flowing fruits. Probably not. this
As the Three Treasures of The Ratio measure said, how can this sect of no transgression violate the ratio, name
Contrary to the specific amount? Who? And as Mahayana and Hinayana now have different forms and are not real,
If we take the righteousness of the same flowing fruit alone, how can this justice violate the result and not be proportional to the name
Contrary to the specific amount? And as the "Treatise" cites 'bottles, etc. are constant', the righteousness of injustice violates the beginning and has no aftermath
Because of the proportional quantity, it is the relative quantity that violates the receiving, so it is known that justice cannot be violated
The specific quantity is also contrary to the specific quantity. Ruo'er, why did Sanzang cite this solution to contradict the quantity? ”
Answer: "Now the Three Tibetan Meaning Clouds: Now the Dharmas are separated from karma and helped to use only powerfully and so on
Flowing fruit, if it is an improper name, violates the righteousness of the Great and Hinayana karma to help take the fruit
Therefore, it is a relatively contradictory measure. The amount of three ratios that it violates, how said before, but zong
Yi Yun: Now the Dharmas are separated from the causes and conditions to help and be unable to use the same flowing fruit. if
To make this interpretation, that is, the Manifest Evil Sect violates the right ratio, the Miaofu Inner Sect, and the Good Shun Cause Mingye.
"On the" Yun: "It is the reason for sending the Fa to the door of each other." "Shu" Yun: "Why violate the other present quantity and other five is the sect."
Passerby? In this way, the five sects are the reasons for sending the Dharma to each other. The predicate is the self-phase of the dharmas, their sounds
Self-knowledge is what the ear hears, and the ear knows, that is, the righteousness of what is heard, and the name is the door. Now the voice
Those who are not hear, do not lose their voices, but send the door of what they hear, so they have become too. The remaining four
Well, this is known. There is also a great virtue XieYun: "This is five passes, not against the law, but sent."
The fa, hence the name Fa, is called the Fa, and the body phase of the Fa is called the self-phase. The doorman is convenient, and the righteousness is called self-reliance, such as
Saying that the voice is not heard, that is, it is convenient to violate the law heard on the sound. "Today: i.e
These five kinds of laws are self-contradictory, so it is said that "they are the self-discipline of the laws."
Hence" also. Who? And if "the sound is not heard", that is, it is contrary to what is heard by the standing and the enemy's ear
Righteousness, the law of non-hearing self-righteousness. "Bottles, etc. are constant" sects, that is, there are no three phases of the first and the last
The cause of impermanence is contrary to the righteousness of the law of self-contradiction. Victory theory stands "sound is constant",
That is to say, it is the meaning of self-teaching and impermanence, and the law of dispatch is self-contradictory. Wai Su Fei
The Moon Sect, that is, for many people in the world to agree that it is the righteousness of the moon phase violation, and the non-moon phase is not the moon
also. My mother is the Stone Girl Sect, that is, it is also the righteousness of my mother that violates the law.
This is also according to the great cause of the other, and if the other theory is clearly self-explanatory at the beginning, it is not necessary to quote this. It is holy
Teach self-judgment, do not work more than the rest of the interpretation also. In the solution of the cause, the "sparse" cites the rest of the people to solve the "failure"
Words, in order not to become a sect, so the name is not a cause. The Mage broke the clouds: "If you can't become a sect, you will be named."
Those who are "not successful" cannot be heard by the cause, but should be the cause of not being, and it should be the cause, so
Knowing that the cause body is not successful, so the name is not a cause. If he who breaks this, he saves the clouds: the cause of what he hears
Although it may not be used as a metaphor, Chengzong must also be used as a metaphor for reflection. Nothing can be said or done
sect. Its non-cause must not become a sect, so it is not a sect name "not to become" also. If you do this salvation,
He is righteous and righteous, so he must not agree on what he hears because of the difficulties. Now it helps to break the clouds: if it can't be done
Those whose names are not fulfilled by the ancestors are contrary to each other. The same product is not there, so it must not be used as a metaphor
Shuncheng, there is a cause for the different product, so it must not be used as a metaphor; it should not be a sect, and the name should not be a cause.
Although it is not a sect, it is caused by the whole patriarchal law, so it is the ultimate cause of the cause of the body is not complete, and the name is not formed
also. And in the "Shu" to explain the unnamed words: with one, this non-conformity contains three kinds of words:
Or there is a cause but not a self, or there is a cause alone is not a non-self, or there is a cause or a self
Or he's even more incompatible. But in this case, but he is not self-defeating, it is not
It is not said that the name is one or the other, that is, it is not one of the causes of self and him. Quasi-this
The text of "Shu" means that there are three failures in the non-attainment. Three in one, so the name "with one". If this is the solution,
Not necessarily. Nan Yun: If the name "with one" is one of the three, it should also be four
In the middle of one reason, the two are also called "with one". If one word does not contain three, three in one
The name of the person "with one" can also be two, and the two are followed by one "with one". Word two
It is said that the full point, one point, etc. also. Since there is a reason for this, I know that I cannot make this solution. Immediacy: And
If the two are not established, and the enemy is not a cause, it is not allowed to follow one person
The name "with one" also. In the midst of the hesitation, the "Treatise" cloud: "For the sake of becoming a great species and combining fire." "Sparse Cloud:
The river is large, the bank is large, and the wind is strong. And the mountains and so on
Where there is no river and no river, there are four major sexes, so the cloud species and the union. If this is the solution, I am afraid it is not
correct. With smoke into fire, will it be from the river, the shore, etc. to be a great species and a heya? And: Turning smoke into fire, what is the point?
Sex of the Four Great harmonies and the fire? Therefore, it is not known that this interpretation can also be made. There are two kinds of fire: one
The great species and the fire of the union, such as the fire gathering, the earth and the great and so on, and the two are as hot as the other
There is fire in the wood. For the simple nature of fire, so it is said that the great species and the combined fire also. Solved
In the non-common text, the "Treatise" cloud: "The constant impermanence is separated from this cause." Constant impermanence. Yu is not for a reason. ”
"Shu" Xie Yun: This interpretation also. Among them, the "Constant" sect takes "Void" and so on as its counterpart, and "Bottle" as its counterpart
Its strange products are not found everywhere. Turtle hair, etc., ingestion of impermanent products
The complex is indescribable, and it is even more metaphorical that Yu Fa has this cause and meaning. With the remainder and the impermanence
There is no extraordinary, non-impermanent brother three products. If this explanation is made, I am afraid that this is not the case.
And such as turtle hair, etc., if there is a cause that can be "heard", and the meaning of "permanent residence" is the same law
Metaphorically, obedience and non-conformity can be guarded against; neither can stand nor establish the two laws, and the cloud and the other think the same
metaphor? Therefore, it is known that this solution is not beneficial to Thesis. If the turtle hair is very and impermanent, I am afraid it is different
The foreign product, in order to cover up this, is not obedient to the meaning of the common, why should it be covered in this? if
Although words are not obedient and do not share, how to waste and cover the remnants, why do not cover the former interpretation of the "common", want
To the "non-communist" Fangshaye? Also: The previous sentence of the cloud "constant and impermanent products are separated from this cause", and the correct solution is "not common". Next sentence
The words "constant, impermanent and external remaining are not for a reason", which is both a cover for the remainder, and does not release the sentence of non-common;
Words are explanatory sentences, so it must be said that "Yu is not there" Yes? If you have done it, you can't do it
This solution also. Nowadays, XieYun: "Constant and impermanent goods are separated from this cause", the correct interpretation is not synonymous; "constant and impermanent is outside."
Non-existent", interpreted into non-common also. How does the cloud come about? And as the question goes, "'Why is it permanent and impermanent to leave this place?'
Because 'yay? "Shi Chengyun: For example, the sound theorists set up all sounds and sounds on the disciples of the Buddha, because of the clouds
For the reason that it is heard that in addition to the sect, the Dharma, the enemy theory, and the impermanence are the zongyu, so there is no cause for hearing
also. This solution shows that the Yu Sect has been outside the remaining constant, impermanent and not has the cause of "hearing", so it is said that "constant and impermanent."
The rest of the world is not for a reason" also. If this interpretation is made, it is to interpret the previous sentence into a dissenting meaning. Q&A in "Sparse"
Yun: "Q: 'The quantity' is through two products, and the whole place is different and does not receive any; although there is no 'smelled', it is not a different product."
Non-indeterminate. "As "Sparse" said." Answer: This is only because it is the voice of the Law, and it does not understand the same and different, so it is not
decide. Another example is the grass and trees in the mountains, none of which belong, but have the righteousness of this person and others, that is, the name is uncertain.
Now what is heard is also in the aftermath. If it is in the remaining product, that is, the empty pass is the same and different product
Righteousness, therefore, is uncertain. "If this interpretation is made, I am afraid that this is not the case. The grass and trees in the mountains, although there are no genus, of course
There may be one person or another person, so there is no definition of xu grass and trees. "Smelled" because it belongs only to the sound sect,
After all, there is no understanding of the same and different products, why can the cloud be the same as the other? Therefore, it is not known that this interpretation can be made
also. Ruo'er, if you don't share the same and disagree, how can you solve the same problem? Present XieYun: Passing through the other
The same and different products are the same law; it is because they are not common, they are not the same, and they are different products
adventitious. Who? And if the common pass is the same product, the other product, the product, so it is the void, bottle, etc.
It is the same law that is constant and impermanent; therefore, it is because of the cause of non-common, and it is not the same product or different product
Therefore, it is also different from color and emptiness, so it is also impermanent and impermanent. if
With this difficulty, ying yun: color and so on are impermanent, color and so on are not heard, and the sound is heard, that is
It is permanent residence; it can also be the void is permanent residence, the void is not heard, the sound is heard, the sound
It should be impermanent. It is difficult to do this, so I know that the common covenant is the same, there are differences and the same law, so it is shuncheng
Indeterminate; not to agree on the same as nothing, different from nothing to do different, so it is reflected in hesitation. And "Sparse"
Q&A Cloud: Q: For example, Li Zongyun "all sounds are constant", because the cloud "takes the sound as it is". Constant, impermanent
All are separated from this cause, and the constant and impermanent are not the same, and should they not be together? Answer: "Sound"
There is a law, "constant" is the law, and the cause is the cloud "to be sound.". This cause is the law of the law,
There is no other meaning than the law. Not patriarchal, not indeterminate, but not excessive.
This solution is the same as that of the Theory of Reason, that is, there is no law that cannot become a law. Again: "Sparse" in the interpretation of "smellability"
Because he is not in common, the Etomologian master establishes this cause for the disciples of the Buddha, and hopes that he is the three phases
To be sufficient is to look at him as to be the cause of nothing but sound, so he is the only one who does not share it
Nor is it. And as the voice of the Buddha of others, etc., is a foreign product, and its smell is due to the existence of the other,
He got the name of him not to share also. Ruoer, what is the name of the cloud? Present Xieyun: Hope for common goods,
There is nothing in the heterogeneous product, the name is not common, and the Dharma has established a "hearability" cause for the sound theorist, that is
In other buddhas, there is a voice, so it is known that it is also common, and there is no other product, which is called non-common. "Sparse" is judged
Self-non-commonality is not also. The solution violates the decision in the text. "On" Yun: These two are jujutsu causes,
Therefore, the names are uncertain. "Sparse" Xie Yun: This knot has also been. Q: The ratio of sound and victory to victory is all, Ho
So the clouds are hesitant? A: Although there is no more than enough in this two ratio, it makes witnesses and listeners unpredictable
The reason for right and wrong is said to be suspicious of the other: "As soon as there is a sound of the Law, its sects are opposed to each other, and the cause and the metaphor are different, and the ho is right."
evil? "Therefore, he hesitates, and is called the indeterminate one." If there is no fault in the real ability, the enemy will not doubt it
Should the audience and witnesses suspect that it is the cause of hesitation? Therefore, it is known that the judgment of public doubts should not be indefinite.
Present Xieyun: Although the two commentators of sound and victory have their own righteousness, they stand up to each other, and the enemies believe in each other, each with three phases and words
Although the Middle School has established itself as a sect, the hearts are both causes of each other, so it is said that both are hesitant causes, not
The audience, the righteous, are uncertain. Who? And as the victory theory of the mind hesitates, as I am
The cause of the nature of the work, standing and the enemy are allowed to have three phases, so they can prove that there is no impermanence? For sex as he smells
Because, both the standing and the enemy are allowed to have three phases, so they can prove that they are constant? Again: The Voice Theorist Hesitate Cloud: For
As I have heard of sexual causes, both the enemy and the enemy are allowed to have three phases to prove that they can prove that they are constant? For as he did
Because, standing and enemy are allowed to have three phases, so they can prove impermanence? Therefore, I know that but I am covenanted, and the heart of the enemy
Self-hesitation, so the name is uncertain also. Also: In the paper, the first victory is cited on the theory of the sect, the cause, and the metaphor, and then the voice is raised
It is difficult to discuss the sect, cause, and metaphor, and to make decisions that violate the law according to the cause and effect. If it is based on this cause, it is difficult
There are two decisions for violating each other: one is about three phases, and the cause of Ying Yun's work has three phases, sound
It is impermanent; it can also be heard because of the three phases, and the sound should be permanent. Two is about two metaphors
Difficulty, difficulty is the same as the cloud: the bottle has a cause of impermanence, the manifestation of the sound is also impermanent; it can also be acoustic
What is heard is permanent, and what is heard is constant. Difficult Metaphor Cloud: The Void is
Often do nothing, sound does something is impermanent; can also be electricity and other impermanence is not heard, sound is also
What is heard should be constant. If you go along with this, it is difficult to apply. Again: "Shu" in the Q&A cloud: "Q: Sound theory."
Depravity should be a passing of the sect. If it is lost in the nine, how can it be against the present and teach? A: Sound theory
Say 'sound dwells', the ear has not been heard permanently. Although Shengyi is simple and non-religious, the covenant is finally broken
Now, teach. This is by words, so there is no sect, it is said that it is victorious over righteousness, and the sound is constant. Excuse me
If it is not true, it is contrary to the world's present and teaching the second quantity. "There should be no questions and answers here. And as in the past
Those who violate the present and the teachings, those who violate themselves, violate the common appearance, and teach, say that they violate other present and teach, not the sect
pass. This is the use of the doctrine of victory, but it is contrary to him, and the righteousness of the Zhengshun Sect is not known
Cooperate with this Q&A, Joel, why rationalize the door, now in this here the teaching power is victorious, should be based on this
Answer: This text means that the decision to contradict the decision does not know who is right and who is wrong, but
Looking at one's own righteousness and the present and teaching of the family, using the victor's thoughts to decide, pretending to be saying yes and no
It is the present in the sect and the teachings that contradict each other. And the Q&A cloud in "Sparse": Ask, with three phases, should be positive
Why is this uncertain? Answer: This doubt is unresolved, I dare not solve it, and those who have passed through the difficulties will follow the blanks. Present Xieyun: If there is three
Phase, not three phase violations. Also: Not to be affected by the cause of the enemy, but to be the cause of the enemy, although it has three phases, it is still there
The enemy is rebellious, so they make each other's hearts or minds, and they do not know who is right and who is wrong, so although they have three phases
The name is uncertain also. In the middle of the solution, the "Treatise" Yun: "The predicate is contrary to the cause of the law, the difference between the law is contrary to the cause, and the law is contrary to the self."
Causes, legal differences and contradictory causes, etc. "Shu" Xie Yun: "This column name is also." sect
There are two types. In a word of sutra, there are two: one is self-phase, such as impermanence, etc.; two are self-phase, such as sound
wait. Two meanings of Xu Sect, and two: the difference between one law is that there is self above the previous law self-talk sect
Intention, such as the impermanence of Mahayana consciousness, etc.; the two have the difference between the laws, which are said to be the laws before
Above the self-talking sect there is self-will, Mahayana without leakage, and so on. Question: For example, Mahayana consciousness changes voices
Etc. should be the difference, why not say? Answer: Consciousness of changing sounds, etc., is the Dharma self-phase, in the Mahayana way
Sound is only from the recognition of change, nothing but changers. Its consciousness is impermanent, electricity, etc., so it is the law
difference. In this case, the understanding of impermanence is a difference in the law, and I am afraid that this is not the case. Who? And if it is violated
The recognition of changing the voice and other words shows the law, that is, the recognition of the change of sound is the law of self-phase; the cause is violated
Consciousness is impermanent, and its words are manifested, so why is it illegal to recognize impermanence? if
The color is therefore the difference between the law, and the impermanence of speech is also the color, etc., and should be illegally self-phased? old
Those who know what they say, although they should also be self-righteous in color, but those who are frustrated should not be left, too
The law is different, so it is known that this interpretation cannot be made. Now it helps to explain the clouds: If the consciousness is impermanent, it is the Law
Self-phase, with nothing but consciousness of impermanence. If the ear consciousness changes the sound on the impermanence and dependence
The sound of evil, consciousness, etc. is impermanent, and the one who is confused with one, that is, the impermanence that is violated is the law
The difference is only against the will, not in words. In the solution of the difference in the cause of the violation, ask:
Accumulation is due to the violation of non-accumulation of other uses, that is, the cause of the difference between the law and the violation of the law, and the cause of the nature that should be done
Violating the impermanence of the law should be the cause of the difference between the law and the law. Who? And as the Dharma is right
The sound theorist stands for impermanence, the sexual reasons, such as bottles, etc. Vocalists and Dharma
The difference in the law is due to the clouds: "The sound should not be impermanent, and the sexual cause is made, such as a bottle."
Etc. To the bottle is four dusty so also. "If there is such a difficulty, how to explain it? A: Product
The polygenic cause and hope method has three phases of self-sufficiency, and the difference with the law is the cause, and it also has three phases,
Therefore, the difference between the law and the law is contrary to the cause of the harvest. The cause of its work is that the Law of Self-Appearance has three phases, and
The difference between the laws is not a cause of impermanence, but a strange product and a dust and an impermanent electricity
For a reason, illegal differences contradict the causes also. Should be reversed and indeterminate over the cloud: for such as electricity and so on
Is sex impermanent? Is it not impermanent for such things as bottles?
Also: In the Shu, he asks: "There is no accumulation of the sects he has received, and the number theory is from the Xu Tong bedding, which is the Law."
The difference is that his Buddhist disciples have set up a 'sound extinguishing' for the number theorists, and they also promise to extinguish the flame of the pass
On, why is it illegal to be self-righteous? If it is a person who is self-possessed, he can do it differently. "Wide answer to this
Ask as explained in "Sparse". Now I help to explain the cloud: words are self-evident, and they can distinguish the law from the extreme. Can you not
Polar, so non-autophasic. The difference in the name of the consent can not be achieved. He will not allow it, and he will not abolish it
into a difference. The two meanings are both different and therefore cannot be compared with each other. There is a law that contradicts Wen Yun: "Yes."
Sex is not real, not virtuous, not karma, there is a reality, so there is virtue and karma, so it is like the opposite sex. "Q: This" has one
"Different" and other causes, in order to use the three laws to form three laws, in order to use the three causes to establish the three sects? A: There are three laws
Don't become three laws, such as "having a reality" because of the "non-real" law, "having virtue, karma" because of the "non-moral" law, "non-karma"
law. How did it stand? And as Zong Yun said: "Non-reality, non-virtue, non-karma, the three laws are different, so they know the cause and the word."
There is a reality and so on into one law also. If it is said that the three causes are combined into three Laws, each one has a point of weight
Who has established oneself? And if there is a cause of "one reality," the disciple also believes in non-virtue and non-karma, and if so, he can
If a disciple believes in non-virtuousness and non-karma, why should he repeat it? The cause of "virtue" is that the disciple also believes that it is not true,
If non-karma can also become non-real and non-karmic, and the disciple believes, why should he repeat it? "Karma"
For this reason, the disciple also believes in non-reality and non-karma, and if he can also become non-real and non-virtuous, the disciple believes, so why should he?
Re-enactment? Therefore, with the three causes and three laws, each one has a point of repetition and self-establishment. Well known
Three causes each establish a law also. Question: The number theory is a solution, and it is not allowed to use the eye as a false other, by cause and metaphor
establish. The eyes are used by false others, although they are used against the truth, and they are used against him for the sake of the true, because of the name
Differences, not against each other, can also be. The Five Peaks are only separated from reality, and it is difficult for disciples to deviate from reality
true. To take the other is to replace the departed, should be in violation of the law to distinguish the collection? Answer: Although number theory is contrary to the truth
Use, have their own false him for the real him. Because the difference is not self-phase, the five tops violate the other and deviate from reality
Yes. There is a substitute separation from nothing, because it is not different from the self. Who? And like bedding, total
Xu is used for false use, because of the power of the metaphor, the establishment of eyes and other false uses. Take your own false he for himself
True to others, because of the difference in name. The same difference and common promise are not separated from reality, nor are they real,
Because of the cause and the metaphor, the establishment has sex, not from the reality. There is no self-separation
It really exists, so because of the name against itself. Question: Sex has a real sex, not the same
It is difficult to get, and there is a reality of the same difference, and there is a real similarity between the same and the same
For example, there is a real sex, there is no great evil, answer: If there is sex, it is difficult to have sex
It is not difficult to be the same, to violate the consent of the common, and it is difficult to be the same as the other, and after violating him, it can be broken
also. Question: There is one reality, virtue, and karma in the same way, the same and the same are not separated from the reality, and there is one reality in the case of breaking the sex.
Virtue and karma, sex is not separated from reality, it is difficult to break the existence of the master; it can also be the same as the difference
That is, there is reality, there is a reality, virtue, and karma, and there is sex, that is, there is no reality, it is difficult to break the brother
Son has Yay? Answer: The cause of universal contradiction is the righteousness of the person who violates the cause of the argument, so it is difficult to be a teacher
Stand it. If there is an unclear cause of the establishment and the righteousness of the one who violates the teachings, the existence of the disciple must not be broken
also. Question: As the sound theorist broke the Dharma's analogy cloud: "Sound should be impermanent, sound is made."
Sex is like a bottle, etc. "This is the only violation of the doctrine of the law and the law of self-contradiction, if the word is, everything
Faindus passed, how to explain? If it is not true, this is only a violation of the law, there is
Why did you know that Feyoh? Answer: It should be made indefinitely: for the sake of the nature of such as bottles
Non-impermanent sounds, testimonial sounds are not impermanent sounds? For the sound of other Buddhas
Is it an impermanent sound, and the nature of the testimony is an impermanent sound? Q: Ruosheng
The "doing" of the theory of victory is due to this fault, except for the extremely lawless
How can we make a promise with him? Answer: If there is a passing, it should be more clear: total
If there are causes that contradict each other, they must not be translated, and if they are the authors of the law, there are all the causes of difficulty
Ever, as the saying "sound should be impermanent is" also. If you do not overturn the law, if you do not violate the common promise and break the law,
There is a law that contradicts the cause and effect, that is, if there is sex, there should be no yes or no. If so, but
It can be said that "sex should not be great", that is, it is contrary to his permission, and it must not be said that there should be sex
Deviating from reality, from virtue, from karma, that is, by translating the fa into the fa, all causes and effects become difficult
also. It is also more obvious: If the establishment of the law is convenient for those who have the law, it must be in phase with the practice of the law
Violation of the past. If it is difficult to say that there is sex but not reality, although the non-real law is established, it is intended to be revealed
There is no great law of separation from reality, so it is contrary to the law of the other. If only
The law does not want to facilitate the law, and the law of the uncooperative violates the cause of itself. i.e. "sound."
it is impermanent", etc., but to establish the law of "impermanence", it is not convenient to establish a law, so it is not convenient
There must be no law that contradicts itself. If you are a strong author, it is convenient to break all causes, what is the name
Can break! And in the "Shu", Yun: "Question: Fu Tong, Different Pins Hope Patriarchal Law, its 'has a reality' and other causes."
There is 'same sex' in the same product, and there is no 'turtle hair' in the same product, so there is a problem in this
Is the law contrary? "In this case, the turtle hair is used as a foreign product, or it is copied by people, or it is written
Loose heart (coarse). Who? And if it is not a real sect, it is advisable to take the reality, virtue, and karma as its foreign products,
Its turtle hair is not real, not moral, not karma, why is the cloud taken as a different product? Hence the name
Must be wrong also. Also: In this way, it is difficult to show the four contradictions, and the law is contrary to the difficult cloud: what is done
53
In the same product, it is allowed to prove that the sound is permanent; what is done is only the transformation of the different product, and the cloud can show it
often? The difference between the law is difficult to cloud: the accumulation of bedding, the use of bedding for other purposes, for example
Eye accumulation, the eye is also used for others, the other is used for others, and it can also be accumulated in the bed, only
For the purpose of false other use, for example, the accumulation of the other eye, etc., the eye is only used for false others, contrary to the other true him
use. There are laws that contradict each other because of difficult clouds: the same difference has a reality, virtue, karma, the same difference is not different, etc.,
For example, there are sexes such as reality, virtue, karma, sexual non-reality, etc.; they can also be similar to each other, and there is one truth, virtue, etc.
Karma, the same as the difference is not great, for example, there is a reality, virtue, and karma, and there is sex is not great. There is a law
Differences contradict each other: there is a real cause of similarities and differences, and the same differences are not real. sexual
There is a real cause, and there is a sexual non-real, etc. Similarities and differences have a real cause, and similarities and differences are not done
There is a fate. For example, there is a real cause such as sex, and there is sex and there is no dependent nature. Q: The last three phases
The contradiction is that there is a difficulty in the parable of the same or different, it should be a metaphor, and it is why it is said that the cause of the violation is the cause
Yes? Answer: The covenant is excessive, it is the cause of the violation; it is not a metaphor for the embarrassment of the covenant. And "Sparse"
"If the sound theory saves the cloud: 'There is no obstacle in the sound, take the cover.'"
Table; emptiness metaphorically, only its cover; or emptiness and sound, only cover non-table. 'Do this to save
He who does not quench can stand. "Yu Dade did not allow this, so he broke the clouds: as described in the "Shu", these two families are righteous,
Who is it? Answer: Master Yu is righteous and righteous, and it is natural to teach the reason. According to the main solution of "Shu", it is contrary to reason.
Those who violate the predicate have the metaphors of righteousness, cause, and the same law, and have the ability to take, cover the table, and cover the remaining table
This, manifestly righteous, has no righteous sect, cause, or the same law metaphor, but only takes its cover and does not take the table,
It's unjustified. If the metaphor of the "void" is a metaphor of unrighteousness, it can be allowed to be only covered, and it can not be established;
Take "emptiness" as a metaphor for righteousness, so "emptiness, no obstacles", why cover only? Again: sound, "done" on the bottle
To be able to stand is to have a righteous law, not to cover it; the law of "no quality" above sound and emptiness, which is evidenced by it
Righteousness, how non-table? Therefore, do not take the table, against the reason first also. Contrarians, Theory of Theory Cloud: Former
Take the mask table, and then only take the mask. Xie Yun: There is a metaphor for the preceding same law in the metaphor of righteousness ratio, there is
Righteousness is taken to cover the table, and after the different laws are metaphorically different, and the reason for taking the cover is based on the other,
This theory is also cloudy: the common saying table is not impermanent, the statement is not done, there is nothing, there is
The theory of righteousness takes the cover so as to take the cover, and the violation of the religion is also the first. Q: Sabbado is nothing
The void theorist establishes that "emptiness is constant, not for what is done", and the enemy theory of "non-doing" is not allowed to have a table, and this is the response
Is there a follow-up? Answer: Since "non-doing" is used as a righteous cause, there is no emptiness, yes
Go with the flow.
Briefly copied from the ming into the positive theory
(The pictures in the text originated from the author's own purchase and were edited by the author)