For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to see more content in time, click "Follow", we will update you with wonderful information every day!
Recently, in the solemn hall of the United Nations, a vote on whether Palestine can become a full member of the United Nations has caused quite a stir.
You think it's just a simple vote? Then you couldn't be more wrong! Behind this is a complex contest involving international politics, geopolitical interests, and national contradictions.
Today, let's take a look at the story behind this vote and see what is going on.
The results of the vote were announced
In the halls of the United Nations, the atmosphere was suffocatingly tense.
With the results of the vote announced, Palestine won the vote on whether to become a full member of the United Nations by an overwhelming margin of 143 votes in favor, 9 against and 25 abstentions.
This result is undoubtedly a great encouragement to the Palestinian people and has also shown them the support and recognition of the international community.
So, who voted for these 9 negative votes? Let's take a look: the United States, Argentina, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, and several small Pacific island nations.
Heck, that's interesting! We can understand the negative votes of the United States and Israel, after all, their relationship with the Palestinians has always been delicate.
But what is going on in Argentina and the Czech Republic? Aren't they afraid of offending so many countries that support Palestine?
"Alternative" voices in the opposition
In this vote, one person was particularly eye-catching: Israel's representative to the United Nations, Erdan.
This delegate is not a fuel-efficient lamp, after the vote, he actually staged a "performance art" in front of everyone - shredding the UN Charter into confetti with a paper shredder! What a shocking scene!
I saw Erdan shredding the paper while chanting the words: "You are tearing up the Charter of the United Nations with your own hands."
How does that sound ironic? Was he suggesting that the vote was unfair? Or is he unhappy with Palestine becoming a full member of the UN? In any case, his move undoubtedly shocked everyone present.
Countries' reactions and attitudes
When the results of the vote were announced, the reaction of countries was also different.
Israeli Foreign Minister Katz took to social media to relentlessly slam the UN decision, calling it a "manipulative, distorted and detached from reality" resolution, and described the result as an "excessive reward" for Hamas.
As soon as these words came out, the smell of gunpowder in the air suddenly became extremely strong.
And what about the United States? Their attitude was a bit confusing this time.
"Our vote is not intended to obstruct the establishment of a Palestinian State, and we have always publicly stated our firm position on the establishment of a Palestinian State," they claimed.
"It seems like there is a bit of a dissonance in your words, you claim to support the state of Palestine and then you vote against it? Is this the so-called "inconsistency between words and deeds"?
The difficult journey of Palestine and the prospects for the future
The road to statehood in Palestine has been full of twists and turns.
They have long been subjected to Israeli occupation and oppression, and their territories have been encroached upon and their people have been displaced.
Yet, even in the midst of such a difficult situation, the Palestinian people have maintained their faith and spirit of struggle.
They aspire to freedom, independence, and the right to live on an equal footing, and have made tremendous efforts and sacrifices to do so.
The victory of this vote has undoubtedly brought new hope and impetus to the Palestinian people.
They have seen the support and recognition of the international community, and they have also seen the possibility of their own future nation-building.
However, the road is still fraught with challenges and unknowns.
Israel's hard-line attitude, the ambiguous position of the United States, and the complex entanglement of interests of the international community could be stumbling blocks in their way forward.
Who are the real winners?
Looking back on the beginning and end of this voting turmoil, we can't help but ask: Who is the real winner in this contest between justice and interests? Is it Palestine?
Although they won the vote, the road ahead is still full of unknowns and challenges; Is it Israel? Although they expressed strong opposition, they could not change the outcome of the vote; Or those countries that voted yes or abstained? They may have gained some benefit or balanced international relations in this contest.
However, in any case, we cannot ignore the fact that there are no real winners in this voting storm.
Because this contest is not only about the fate of Palestine and Israel, but also affects the nerves of the entire international community.
In this contest, everyone can be a loser or a winner.
Because the game between justice and interests will never stop, what we need to do is to seek a just, reasonable and sustainable solution on the basis of respecting history, facts and human rights.
Epilogue:
Although the turmoil over Palestine's accession to the United Nations has come to an end for the time being, this contest of justice and interests is far from over, and it is not only about the fate of Palestine and Israel, but also touches the sensitive nerves of the entire international community.
There are no absolute winners or losers in this issue, because everyone is a participant and witness to this game.
What we can be sure of is this: justice will be done regardless of the outcome, because justice may be late but will never be absent, so let's wait and see!
In the days to come, we will continue to follow the development of this issue and look forward to the early emergence of a just, reasonable and sustainable solution that will bring true peace and freedom to the Palestinian people.
What are your thoughts on this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss
Disclaimer: The picture material comes from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete!
Warm reminder, this article is the first work of the original headlines, it is forbidden to move to other platforms within 72 hours, the rights protection function of the whole network has been opened, and the plagiarism porter has complained and reported on the whole network, thank you for your understanding!