The German foreign minister "flipped the table" against China, provoked China three times in succession, and threatened not to rule out sending warships through the Taiwan Strait. What are the specific provocative actions of Foreign Minister Nade? And how did we fight against the army?
At the regular press conference of the Chinese Foreign Ministry on May 6, Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian clearly stressed that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory, and China's determination to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity is unwavering. China always respects the navigation rights enjoyed by all countries in accordance with international law, but resolutely opposes any country provoking and threatening China's sovereignty and security in the name of freedom of navigation. The reason why Lin Jian wants to emphasize the above remarks is mainly to oppose German Foreign Minister Baerbock's first army, because just recently, Baerbock arrogantly threatened that the German warship "Baden-Württemberg" will not only pass through the South China Sea but also pass through the Taiwan Strait during its upcoming Pacific mission. Obviously, Baerbock's above-mentioned remarks are deliberately provoking China's sovereignty in the South China Sea, openly cooperating with the United States and other external forces on Taiwan-related issues, and sending a seriously wrong signal to the DPP authorities and "Taiwan independence" elements on the island. In response to Baerbock's arrogant and ignorant remarks, we must give a strong warning.
In fact, in recent times, Baerbock's provocative moves against China are far more than these, counting this time, it should be said that in just 11 days, she has provoked China three times in a row. On the 25th of last month, at the opening ceremony of the climate conference in Berlin, the capital of Germany, she openly labeled China as the so-called "worst polluter" on the climate issue, and used this as an excuse to "secretly knock" China, claiming that China and other "heavily polluting" developing countries should pay more money to help poor countries cope with climate change as countries prepare to negotiate new UN climate finance targets. To put it bluntly, it is to get China to contribute more money and effort to combat climate change.
But the fact is that in recent years, the mainland has actively responded to climate change, taken strong actions, and the results are remarkable, on the contrary, those developed countries, their domestic production and life are the most "seriously polluted", they will only regard climate change as a political issue and frequently hype, smear and slander other countries, but in the solution of climate change problems have never been progressive, in the early years, they promised to raise more than 100 billion US dollars a year to provide climate finance support to developing countries, However, after several years, there is still no change in funding, but the military budgets of these countries are getting higher every year. Even when the Japanese government openly discharged nuclear sewage into the Pacific Ocean, this kind of behavior that is extremely damaging to the earth's marine ecological environment is because Japan is a loyal "little brother" of the United States, so the United States and Western countries turn a deaf ear to it, and this is the ugly face of Western politicians, including Baerbock, who habitually use "double standards" on the issue of climate change.
In addition to slandering China on climate change, Baerbock has also hyped up the so-called "de-risking" of China, citing Germany's dependence on Russian oil as an example, saying that after the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Germany began to import liquefied natural gas from the United States and other countries at high prices. This reminded her that in response to Germany's so-called "over-dependence" on China, she argued that Germany should seek direct trade in critical minerals with Australia. She cites the example of lithium mines, which she thinks would be wise if Germany could import lithium directly from Australia, since it comes from Australia, is then exported to China for processing, and the finished product is then exported to Germany. She also hyped up the hype that China is "becoming more and more aggressive", arguing that Australia and New Zealand have a lot of experience dealing with China, and that they "feel the fierce wind more directly" than Germany.
In fact, Baerbock, a politician with obvious anti-China intentions, is not very popular in Germany, the most obvious example is that German Chancellor Olaf Scholz was invited to visit China last month and did not include German Minister of Economic Affairs and Climate Protection Habeck and Foreign Minister Baerbock, which to a certain extent also reflects Scholz's intention to lower the voice of these two men on China affairs in order to maintain the normal atmosphere of Sino-German cooperation.