laitimes

Guo Degang's response to the "costume stealing incident" can be called a continuation of his usual style. From the very beginning, he adopted his usual gag, trying to divert by emphasizing "precious".

author:Who does Yin Tian hate

Guo Degang's response to the "costume stealing incident" can be called a continuation of his usual style. From the very beginning, he adopted his usual gags, trying to divert the attention of his audience by emphasizing "precious". However, this diversionary tactic does not really answer the most important question of the audience, which is whether or not theft has occurred. In his response, Guo Degang repeatedly emphasized that these costumes were not valuable and no one wanted them, which seemed to imply that these items could be taken at will. However, regardless of the value of these clothes, they belong to the cultural center after all, and cannot be arbitrarily appropriated by others. Such remarks have also aroused doubts and dissatisfaction among some people, who believe that Guo Degang deliberately avoided the core of the issue here.

Even more puzzling is that Guo Degang claimed that he threw away the costumes as a way to deny the accusation of theft. However, this statement is not universally recognized and understood. Throwing away the clothes does not eliminate the suspicion of theft, but only makes the truth of the incident even more confusing. Why did he choose to throw the costumes away? The motive and logic behind this act is not clearly explained and is difficult to understand. Some people think that this is just a trick he usually uses, trying to get rid of the pressure of public opinion by covering up the facts. However, this practice will undoubtedly further deepen the public's suspicion and distrust of him.

Under the pressure of public opinion, Guo Degang's response appeared to be somewhat hasty and inadequate. He doesn't seem to take the incident seriously, choosing instead to respond with his own humor and teasing. However, this evasion and prevarication will only further amplify the impact of the incident, not alleviate it. As a public figure, he should face his actions more responsibly and give sincere explanations and apologies. Only in this way can we regain the trust and support of the public.

In addition, this incident has also triggered thinking about the management of public cultural resources. As a public institution, the cultural center manages a large number of precious cultural relics and artworks, and its safety and protection should be of paramount importance. However, if even the cultural center cannot guarantee the safety of its property, then where will the public's trust in other public resources be? Therefore, this incident should also arouse the attention of the relevant departments to strengthen the management and protection of public cultural resources.

In general, Guo Degang's response to the "costume stealing incident" was not convincing, but caused more questions and questions. As a public figure, he should take his actions more seriously and respond and explain appropriately. Only in this way can we truly win the trust and support of the public.

Guo Degang's response to the "costume stealing incident" can be called a continuation of his usual style. From the very beginning, he adopted his usual gag, trying to divert by emphasizing "precious".
Guo Degang's response to the "costume stealing incident" can be called a continuation of his usual style. From the very beginning, he adopted his usual gag, trying to divert by emphasizing "precious".
Guo Degang's response to the "costume stealing incident" can be called a continuation of his usual style. From the very beginning, he adopted his usual gag, trying to divert by emphasizing "precious".
Guo Degang's response to the "costume stealing incident" can be called a continuation of his usual style. From the very beginning, he adopted his usual gag, trying to divert by emphasizing "precious".

Read on