laitimes

The railway station collectively rushed the card: the official response was understated, avoiding the important and trivial, and the potential safety hazards were not mentioned

author:I'm kind

Recently, due to the slow security check at Shanghai Railway Station, some passengers were emotional and rushed their cards collectively.

After the video was released on the Internet, netizens accused Shanghai Railway Station of its weak sense of service and lack of necessary emergency plans for passengers traveling during the small and long holidays.

As everyone knows, what is more serious than the sense of service is the major safety hazard that may be hidden. Those passengers who rush the card without security check, if someone deliberately plans and takes the opportunity to carry dangerous goods or contraband, the consequences will be unimaginable!

‬上海火车站旅客集体冲卡,视频一经发布,立即引来围观

The incident occurred on April 3, the first day of the Qingming holiday, and the train station was much more crowded than usual.

The railway station collectively rushed the card: the official response was understated, avoiding the important and trivial, and the potential safety hazards were not mentioned

In the face of such a large passenger flow, only two channels were opened at the security checkpoint of the railway station, resulting in the accumulation of passengers before the security check, and many passengers who were in a hurry to catch the train became more and more excited, which eventually evolved into an adverse event in which some passengers collectively punched the card.

‬官方回应轻描淡写、避重就轻,还试图甩锅给旅客

After reading the reply from Shanghai Railway Station, it is really ridiculous, and at the same time, I also lamented that the official wording is really full of "skills".

The railway station collectively rushed the card: the official response was understated, avoiding the important and trivial, and the potential safety hazards were not mentioned

1. Characterizing the incident as "passengers being emotional and pushing each other" is obviously a deliberate downplay in an attempt to downplay the impact of the incident and artificially weaken the characterization of the incident.

The video was already placed there, and it was obvious that passengers were collectively punching cards, can this incident be characterized as a security incident?

2. Attributing the cause of the incident to "individual passengers not cooperating with the security check operation" is completely irresponsible.

Obviously, there are multiple channels, but in the face of so many queuing passengers, only 2 are still opened, and they don't know how to adapt and be flexible to deal with various possible emergencies.

3. The next improvement measure "the station strengthens the anticipation of the possible instantaneous passenger flow entering the station", which is completely an official perfunctory statement.

The instantaneous flow of passengers entering the station is not a new situation, and it should be a problem that the station needs to deal with every day. The next time a similar situation occurs, it is estimated that the measures will still be the same, and the rectification has been carried out, but the problem has never been truly solved.

‬旅客集体冲卡,暴露出上海火车站多方面、多层次问题

The railway station collectively rushed the card: the official response was understated, avoiding the important and trivial, and the potential safety hazards were not mentioned

1. Obvious insufficient preparation of the plan. The train tickets sold, the number of passengers, and the number of trains are all data that can be obtained in advance, and accordingly, the security channel should be arranged in advance.

2. The on-site response link is extremely weak. Passengers are already lining up in front of you, do you still have to stupidly follow the original plan? Things have changed, should the on-site staff report in time and ask for support. There should also be someone in the background to monitor it from time to time, and in the face of emergencies, you should have been prepared and actively responded.

3. The most serious thing is that so many people can successfully rush the card without authorization. I think this is the biggest problem with this incident, and there are major safety risks hidden behind it.

The so-called passengers are agitated and some people "coax" to rush the cards, what if all this was deliberately planned by someone? Has the nature of the incident completely changed?

If someone takes the opportunity to carry dangerous goods or contraband and gets on the train without security checks, the consequences are chilling.

Just the pushing and stampede that may be caused by the chaos of the scene is also a potential safety hazard worth thinking about and avoiding.

The railway station collectively rushed the card: the official response was understated, avoiding the important and trivial, and the potential safety hazards were not mentioned

Fortunately, this incident did not cause other safety problems, but it was enough to sound the alarm bell and give us a big enough warning.

‬针对此次事件及官方回复,网友们也是纷纷吐槽

Some netizens believe that this is completely a dumping behavior, and if you want to blame it, the passengers are to blame for coming early, and it has nothing to do with the train station.

The railway station collectively rushed the card: the official response was understated, avoiding the important and trivial, and the potential safety hazards were not mentioned

Some netizens feel that it is obviously a service unit, but how can it be made into a power department.

The railway station collectively rushed the card: the official response was understated, avoiding the important and trivial, and the potential safety hazards were not mentioned

Some netizens suggested that the units and individuals involved should be severely punished.

The railway station collectively rushed the card: the official response was understated, avoiding the important and trivial, and the potential safety hazards were not mentioned

Read on