When the "silicone face" was mixed into the CCTV drama, the beauty of the prosperous world was beaten back to its original shape, and it was useless for the director to be strong!
The medical beauty face of the heroine Peng Xiaoran in the costume drama "Thrush" has become a hot topic, and the audience has expressed different opinions on her modified appearance. As soon as she appeared, it attracted controversy, and the audience generally believed that her appearance was in stark contrast to other supporting actresses with natural faces and old drama bones, which made the historical sense of the whole plot instantly disintegrate.
Peng Xiaoran's medical face, like a face from the future, caused the audience to question the ancient aesthetic standards. In costume dramas, the audience is more Xi to seeing actors with natural makeup, and this sudden appearance of modern beauty traces makes people feel uncomfortable. The natural faces of the other supporting actresses and old drama bones in the play are more in line with ancient aesthetics, while Peng Xiaoran's medical beauty face looks out of place.
This kind of visual impact makes people question: should the "thrush" be beautiful with nature? Should the audience's aesthetic expectations for costume dramas keep pace with the times and accept the integration of more modern elements? Does the existence of the beautiful face in the drama sacrifice the sense of ancient history while pursuing beauty?
The controversy caused by Peng Xiaoran's medical face in "Thrush" is not only a view of individual appearance, but also an impact on ancient culture and aesthetic concepts. While appreciating beauty, the audience is also thinking about the balance between tradition and modernity, which leads to a discussion about beauty.
The hit costume drama "Thrush" has attracted the attention of the audience, however, the choice of costumes in the play has become the focus of discussion among the audience. In the process of creating a sense of age, the producers seem to have made some mistakes in the choice of costumes and props that are difficult to ignore, which caused the audience to question the plot and the relationship between the characters.
Audiences generally felt that the design of the relationship between the hero and heroine in "The Thrush" seemed unacceptable, as if it injected modern emotions directly into the ancient background. This sense of disconnection makes the audience confused in the development of the plot and unable to really engage in the plot. The way the hero and heroine interact and behave in a way that is incompatible with the ancient setting, making it feel as if they are in two very different time and space.
The more prominent problem is the choice of clothing. The audience repeatedly pointed out that the costumes in "Thrush" were not only out of place with the times, but also produced contradictions that were difficult to adapt to in the development of the plot. The cultural heritage of ancient times is contrary to modern costume design, which makes the audience feel a sense of detachment and difficult to immerse themselves in the atmosphere of ancient stories.
Producers may have neglected respect for ancient history and culture in their pursuit of innovation and unique fashion styles. The audience appealed that they hope that in the future production of costume dramas, more attention can be paid to the selection of costumes and props to ensure the fit with the background of the era, so that the audience can feel the charm of ancient culture while enjoying the plot.
The top of the form
The bottom end of the form
The broadcast of "Thrush" aroused doubts from the audience, and the producer responded to the audience's doubts silently, triggering a deep reflection on film and television production.
The audience's focus is on the contradictions in the play, the difference between the medical face and the natural face, and the disconnection between the costume and the era background. These problems have not been responded to in a timely manner by the producers, making viewers question the quality of the series. The audience expects the producer to provide a reasonable explanation to answer their doubts during the viewing process.
The producers' choice to remain silent disappointed the audience, who was eager to understand the intentions of the production behind the scenes. This questioning by the audience may become a wake-up call in film and television production, reminding producers to pay more attention to details and logical rationality in their creations.
In the context of the fierce competition in the current film and television drama market, the audience's word-of-mouth and feedback are directly related to the success of the work. The producer should take the opinions of the audience seriously and respond to the audience's doubts in a timely manner, so as to improve the quality and reputation of the work. The "Thrush" incident sounded the alarm for the entire film and television industry, awakening the creators' attention to the quality of their works and audience communication. I hope that in the future production, we can see more high-quality film and television works that pay attention to details and are logical.
The top of the form
The bottom end of the form
