Because Lisa went to the Crazy Horse show, she wanted to call striptease a woman's freedom and "art"?

The public opinion caused by Lisa's participation in the Crazy Horse show is still fermenting.

The latest development is that it is rumored that members of Blackpink will attend, but there is no media source, and there is no official voice, and this sense of gossip is unreliable, just as I faced this incident from occurrence, to fermentation, and now to the confusion of speech.

Overnight, the top idols were going to striptease; Overnight, striptease became art in the mouths of fans?

Freely?

First of all, I don't care about what kind of mood Lisa herself chooses to do striptease, and even these days there is a lot of talk about her going to the Crazy Horse show, and it's not that everyone is full and idle, and I start to worry about why a top idol's sudden choice of "personal freedom".

What we are talking about, and resenting, is the crushing of ideas in the name of "individual freedom" and so-called art.

What does that mean? For Lisa, as an adult woman, she can certainly choose to do a striptease voluntarily, as long as the decision-making process is free of coercion and deception, even if she wants to go to sea, as long as she complies with local laws.

But the problem is that Lisa is not just a simple 26-year-old woman to some extent, she is a big idol, a public star whose influence far exceeds that of ordinary artists.

This leads to the fact that what is a free choice for her is like a nuclear bomb in the field of public opinion.

Because of her, the Crazy Horse Show appeared in the field of vision of many people, and many ordinary people who had only heard of striptease before had an in-depth understanding of what this thing was. However, the more I understand, the more I find that "striptease" performances such as "Crazy Horse Show" that use women's bodies/postures as commodities are more directly reminiscent of "selling the body", the deepest and most direct scar in the history of women's objectification.

For many people (especially women), "striptease" is like a painful and humiliating brand, constituting an emotional offense or irritation.

This was only the first impact she brought about, followed by the huge wave that this incident exploded in the fandom. A top Korean group and K-po like her, an idol for teenagers, her choices and values will have an impact beyond the scope of the individual.

Therefore, this kind of "downward freedom" she does have personally, but some of her identities do not, just like people have the freedom to fall in love, but the love beans that sell fantasy are "forbidden in love".

The paradox brought about by this identity and choice stimulated a very dramatic public opinion discussion at this time: Striptease can also be an art?

Art?

Until the specifics of several shows of Lisa's show come out, we can't predict if she'll take off, or to what extent, a basic respect for waiting for facts to be judged.

But fans can't learn this, a lot of search for Crazy Horse show videos on the Internet, and even well-known such as Dita's wine glass dance, have to take off to the end only 3 o'clock, and there are obvious sexually suggestive movements, they can still swear to tell everyone who follows on the Internet - this is art!

They continue to give the Crazy Horse show some values like the emperor's new clothes, from high-end playgrounds to "people's striptease", from "erotic performances" to "sexy art", and even involving feminism, modern values and conceptual freedom...

Is it necessary? If you really want to see it, you can buy a ticket to see it, but there is no need to pull the feminist flag and turn striptease into art.

In the context of East Asian culture, it is not controversial whether the kind of dance Lisa wants to dance is considered art. If it is really art, when the news first came out, Lisa and the support organization should have forwarded the poster all over the world for the first time, rather than denying or waiting and seeing.

Dita's famous wine glass dance, "art" to the point that it must be castrated in the moldy MV

In fact, Lisa is not a suitable sample to discuss "whether striptease is an art", because she has too much room for choice, Lisa's rules are not the rules of ordinary people, Lisa's return is not the return of ordinary people, Lisa's "free choice" is not a million.

Therefore, using Lisa as an example to discuss "whether striptease is an art or not" will not lead to appropriate results.

And now that the situation is that no one is seriously discussing the problem, is the basic plate of Lisa fans really avant-garde to existentialism at every turn, to say that women's freedom is this level? The ghost doesn't believe it, it's clear that the old guard broke the defense, and the result is that the mouth is harder than diamond, and everyone has seen this kind of drama a lot.

And the most unacceptable thing for me is that they use "freedom" and women's liberation as a tool to support that poor self-esteem from being crushed.

Isn't this a kind of "Stockholm", do fans really recognize that Crazy Horse is art? It's just because of the love beans who rely on faith and maintenance, they chose such a thorny road, they also know that it is thorns, but for the sake of inner consistency, they have to tell themselves and others loudly over and over again that it is a rose.

I understand the feelings of the fans, but I can't approve of their concept stealing.

The dimension of freedom

In fact, until now, many of the focuses of public opinion discussions have been blurred. No one cared why Lisa was going, no one cared about the success of the show, everyone found their own safe fortress in this information field, camped and charged.

But it is not okay to reverse right and wrong, nor can it crush ideas, and I always believe that the promotion of any concept should take into account the simple values of the public and the complex historical longitude and latitude.

For example, the word "freedom" appears as frequently as Lisa herself, "freedom" itself has no dimension, but reality makes it have a dimension. As we know, the "body" is the bottom line for many women.

From ancient times to the present, bloody examples in real life have taught generations of ordinary girls: the road to becoming a prince is locked, the road to get ahead is also full of thorns, only to fall downward, the "door of freedom" to become a prostitute is always open, but it is the abyss.

The reason why the body is the bottom line is because it was, and still is, the only thing that women have left after being deprived of all other rights, and its "objectification" is the final objectification - so behind the sensitivity to the body, there is a complex historical longitude.

If there are many feminists among Lisa's fans, then they should respect this sensitivity and historical context, rather than laughing at its conservatism and obsolescence, and chasing what they consider to be avant-garde ideas.

The body and the body are never the same, and even if Lisa goes to perform on the Crazy Horse show, I believe she will at least have a minimum of decency, she will have clothes to cover her body, and she will have the right to say no to many excessive demands.

However, can ordinary girls get such treatment from her?

Sister Ka's striptease career before she became famous saved her who was trapped in family and life at that time, but it also gave her great mental damage, so that every time she mentioned it afterwards, she had to repeatedly advise other girls not to embark on such a road to the abyss.

And the girls who are trafficked and auctioned by the dark web, the girls who have fallen into the mouth of the tiger in a foreign land, and you use Dita's success and Lisa's freedom to say to them loudly: "Fuge, this is art!" You are supporting yourselves with an ancient art! What else to hesitate! ”

- What is the difference between this and the wicked people who force them to jump into the fire pit?

In the strip club, Dita's success is one of a million, and Lisa's freedom is something that ordinary girls do not and will never have; Many girls take off their last pieces of clothing under the ambiguous lights of the club, and only get half a black bread to feed their children.

epilogue

Finally, I still want to emphasize again:

Whatever Lisa chooses to participate in, as long as it is voluntary and legal, is her freedom and does not have to be harsh.

But please stop washing! Striptease has never been art! It's not about women's freedom!

This is the same as surrogacy, you can wash surrogacy as "the great invention of human reproduction", but when this "great invention" is brought to market, just like striptease as an "art" is promoted to the world -

When the rich are looking for girls everywhere, ready to tie their hands and feet and stuff them into the "black market" of selling eggs, or throw them into the "door of art" of strip clubs, you are applauding Dita and Lisa, but the girls at the bottom can only fall in the dark.

Well, don't pretend, don't you know in your hearts? Shu Qi is right, there is no resistance when undressing, and it is difficult to put it on, this is the reality.

Don't pretend, striptease is art? Is it women's freedom to sell your body? So the "sisters and sisters stand up" advocated by the liberation of prostitutes in the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China can not be interpreted as "nosy, sisters and sisters do not want to stand up at all" in the current black and white upside down context????

Striptease is an art, so I was scolded for having no taste when I watched a commercial movie, and the taste of this audience is really not good; Do you watch a strip show, watch a brush / sq little video is to appreciate art?

I've also seen a lot of fans say, "I was born without cover." That's true, but its next sentence is "take the cloud robe as a monk's robe."

Nakedness is not a sin, nakedness itself is neutral, they can be vulgar or art. But when we discuss it in the public sphere, we need to always remember that reality is the basis of discussion, and the body is not the "original beauty" most of the time, but the last barrier to the evil of human nature.

Is naked motherhood locked in a cellar art? Is it art for naked girls who are hung on the dark web with a clear price? Is it art for a girl who is forced into a club to take off her clothes by a supervisor in an overseas park?

Never blur the concept because of the success and freedom of a few, and beautify the deepest scar in the history of female objectification into art!!

Today's late-night topic is:

What do you think of Lisa going to the Crazy Horse show?

Let's talk about it in the comment area~