In recent years, the United States has always used various excuses to suppress Chinese technology companies, including modifying chip rules and prohibiting Qualcomm, Google, Intel and other companies from shipping freely, the most affected of which is Huawei.
Under such actions, many technology companies around the world have expressed dissatisfaction, including Qualcomm, TSMC and other companies have also stood up against the behavior of the United States, believing that restricting shipments is equivalent to "killing a thousand enemies and losing eight hundred", which will not have any benefits.
Voices from the outside world also said that the US revision of the rules is not aimed at Chinese companies such as Huawei, but at non-US semiconductor companies, because then Qualcomm, Intel and other US companies have obtained licenses and resumed supply to Huawei.
But non-US companies are completely different, including TSMC, ARM, etc., almost all of which have not obtained licenses, and such a situation does expose the "ugly" face of the US side.
More critically, since March this year, the United States has imposed a series of restrictions on Russia's scientific and technological means, and many companies, including Oracle, Microsoft, Apple, etc., have suspended services to Russia.
This move seriously affected the normal use of Russian users, so Russia also made a decision to require relevant enterprises to return to normal as soon as possible, otherwise they will have to bear the corresponding consequences, including a "unilateral software licensing mechanism".
The role of this mechanism is simple, that is, without the consent of the copyright owner, directly update the license to the latest version, in addition to Russia also restarted the largest resource-based website, to crack the software code of those US companies, so that ordinary users can use these software for free.
The main thing is that Russia has also made a decision to continue to invest 3.19 trillion rubles for breaking through the local semiconductor industry, and the news said that Russia will mass-produce 90nm chips this year and plans to mass-produce 28nm chips in 2030.
In the face of Russia's heavy blows, some foreign media believe that those US companies that cut off supplies to Russia cannot run away and will bear the corresponding consequences.
At the end of December 2021, a Moscow court announced that it would impose a fine of 7.2 billion rubles on the US company Google, on the grounds that Google repeatedly refused to remove content officially banned in Russia.
According to CCTV News, Russia has filed a case against Google and enforced a turnover of 7.2 billion rubles, or about 660 million yuan, because Google refused to voluntarily pay the fine before the March 19 deadline.
In fact, Google's 7.2 billion ruble fine is just the beginning, because in addition to Google, another US social giant Facebook has also been fined nearly 2 billion rubles by Russia for similar problems.
There is no doubt that in the future, there will be more US companies facing Russia's layers of "heavy punches", so foreign media believe that none of the supply-cutting enterprises can run away, and will soon taste the bitter fruit.
In russia, the supply of U.S. companies, the subsequent loss will be even greater, because the supply cut has been unable to make consumers trust, so after Apple, Samsung and other companies have suspended operations in Russia, soon Chinese mobile phone brands occupy the main market in Russia.
In addition, Google's supply cut has led to problems with Russia's Android mobile phone system, for which the local media has said that it will plan to use the open source Hongmeng developed by Huawei to create a smart phone system.
The implementation of technical sanctions by the United States on Russia will definitely affect the market position of American companies, at least in Russia itself will be completely abandoned, and Russia will also take this opportunity to develop local related industries, so the outside world believes that the United States will only accelerate the breakthrough of other manufacturers.
Not to mention that the problem of U.S. enterprises cutting off supply has appeared many times, in the international market, many U.S. companies have long become untrustworthy enterprises, and there will be fewer and fewer countries and enterprises that cautiously use U.S. enterprise solutions in the future. What do you think about that? Comment, like, share.