preface
Yesterday I was talking about "Incomplete Sentences in Five-Word Near-Body Poems, The Characteristics of Several 2-3 Structure Sentence Patterns", and today I am talking about incomplete sentence forms with 3-2 structures. The content comes from Mr. Wang Li's Chinese poetics.
The first 3 words are in sentence form, and the last 2 words are nouns. Sentence forms are characterized by subjects and predicates. This syntax seems to be the subject-object structure, but in fact, the last 2 words are not objects.
If you have written a lot of five laws, you can see if you have used this syntax in your works.
一、nN-V+fN
After reading yesterday's article, it is easy to understand the following words:
At first glance, this sentence pattern looks like a subject-object structure, but it is not. The first 3 words are subject-verb structures, and predicates are intransitive verbs. The last 2 words are independent parts, and the noun composed of two words is not the object of the whole sentence.
For example: Spring Pharynx - Dangerous Stone, Daylight Cold - Green Pine. This is a 3-2 structure. Dangerous stone and green pine are not objects, but independent parts.
On the stone, or on the side of the stone, the sound of the spring whimpered. On the pine, or pine side, the sun is cold. It wasn't that the spring whimpered at the stone, the sun was cold and the pine was green.
From Wang Wei's "Passing through xiangji temple":
I don't know Xiangji Temple, miles into the cloud peak.
Ancient trees have no paths, deep mountains where the clock.
Izumi vocal pharynx - dangerous stone, japanese color cold - blue pine.
Bo Twilight Empty Pond Song, An Zen made poisonous dragons.
If you use incomplete sentences in the form of 2-3 sentences, you can write: dangerous stone - spring sound pharynx - green pine - the sun is cold. This is the sentence pattern said in yesterday's article: twilight bell - cold bird gathering, autumn rain - sick monk idle.
From Bai Juyi (Tang) "Luci Jingkong Temple Su YoushangrenYuan":
Without contact with the human realm, the temple gate opens to the mountain.
Twilight bell - cold birds gather, autumn rain - sick monk idle.
Outside the moon hidden cloud tree, the fluorescent corridor is in the middle of the room.
Lucky to throw flowers in the world, for the time being, I have to meditate.
二、NN-F+nN
As for nN, fN, or cN, qN can be, are two word combination nouns. Similarly, a predicate can be a verb V or an F adjective.
For example: Daylight Cold - Green Pine, Cold, Adjective, F.
Another example: NN-F+nN, japonica rice ripening - tianfeng. From Du Fu's (Tang) "Four Songs of Self-Destruction and Migration to Dongtun Hut":
White salt is in the north, chijia ancient city is east.
The flat land is stable and the mountains are on all sides.
Smoke frost miserable - wild sun, japonica rice ripe - heavenly wind.
Personnel wounds are turned, and I will guard Gui Cong.
In the same way, japonica rice ripening and tianfeng are two parts, not a subject-object structure. The smoke and frost and the wild sun are also two parts, and are not subject-object structures. Under the wild sun, the smoke and frost are miserable.
三、fN-F+fN
Chaotic clouds low - thin twilight, fN-F + fN. Cloudy, twilight, all fN, low, adjective, F.
Snow Dance - Return Wind, fN-V + vN. Rapid snow, fN, return wind, vN, are all noun groups with partial positive relations. The predicate of the lower link is the verb dance.
In the same way, these two sentences are not subject-object structures, and they are two parts before and after. Chaotic clouds are low - thin twilight, thin twilight, chaotic clouds low. Rapid Snow Dance - Back wind, swirling wind, rapid snow flying.
The original sentence is from Du Fu's "To the Snow":
War crying more new ghosts, sorrowful groaning alone old man.
Chaotic clouds low - thin twilight, rapid snow dance - return wind.
There is no green in the scoop, and the fire in the furnace is red.
Several states broke the news, and the book was empty.
At the right time, you can change to the 2-3 structure mentioned in yesterday's article, f(v)N-fNV: return wind - rapid snow dance, thin twilight - chaotic cloud low. For example, the poem is synonymous with:
War crying more new ghosts, sorrowful groaning alone old man. [Return wind - rapid snow dance, thin twilight - chaotic clouds low].
There is no green in the scoop, and the fire in the furnace is red. Several states broke the news, and the book was empty.
If you change it in this way, there will be no problem with the fight at all. Just don't rhyme anymore.
It can be seen that Du Fu did not use the 3-2 sentence formula, one of the reasons is the problem of rhyming. Either change "low" to [east] rhyme, or use 2-3 sentences.
The three categories mentioned today are actually a kind of syntax, but the parts of speech in individual positions are different.
Conclusion
A few days ago, someone left a message saying that after seeing so many syntaxes, they would not write poetry. In fact, people who really write a lot of poetry will not make such complaints.
Take "return wind - rapid snow dance, rapid snow dance - return wind" as an example, which sentence is good? In fact, there is no high or low. However, when we write near-body poems, we must conform to the law of flat rhyme, and naturally we must change different syntaxes to suit them.
What if you get a good witty sentence and don't conform to the law? Friends who are familiar with syntax can naturally rejuvenate their skills.
Especially for modern people, many syntaxes seem illogical, so they dare not use them in their own works. If you learn more ancient syntax and know that the ancients used it, you will naturally not be troubled in vain.
For example, the phrase "daylight cold - green pine" seems very familiar to us. But if this syntax appears in the works of today's people, will it be criticized on the Internet?
@Old Street Taste
Incomplete sentences in five-word near-body poems, the characteristics of several 2-3 structured sentence patterns