laitimes

Only have one child, the future pension pressure is great? The truth is not necessarily what we think it is

Wen | Kapok Mom

Young people and old people always have different ideas about the topic of having children.

Only have one child, the future pension pressure is great? The truth is not necessarily what we think it is

The elderly will always think: live a life, live is a person, live is popularity, if the policy is open, conditions allow, it is always good to have a few more children.

And young people will always think: a lifetime can not only live for children, to live for themselves, there is a child around.

In fact, regarding the matter of having a second child and having a third child, many people think that it involves the problem of old-age care, and the pressure of the elderly for only children will be relatively large.

For example, like our family, my family's three children, the reason why I am at ease in the field is because the two sisters are around their parents, if there is only one child, then I definitely hope to be able to accompany my parents. Therefore, many elderly people who persuade young people to have a second child will use the pension as a reason and excuse, and a child will face huge pension pressure in the future.

Only have one child, the future pension pressure is great? The truth is not necessarily what we think it is

Having only one child, will the pressure really be great in the future? In fact, the truth is not necessarily so! Why? There are three main reasons.

1. Only children enjoy better resources

I have watched "Mountains and Seas" before, and the scene that impressed me the most was that the Ma brothers drew lots to decide who would come to school, and finally Defu drew a lottery, so the family's resources were given to his brother Ma Defu for Defu to go to school, and Debao dropped out of school early to work, and earned money with his father for Defu to study.

Now the social and economic level has generally improved, if there is only one child in the family, then all the resources of the family will be given to the child, then even if the child's academic performance is average, the parents will also seek other ways out for the child, in this case, the child's future career treatment will not be too bad, and the parents have created better material conditions for the child, in general, parents and children are relatively relaxed.

Only have one child, the future pension pressure is great? The truth is not necessarily what we think it is

2. Parents can accept nursing homes

Not many people in our parents' generation can accept the idea of living in a nursing home, especially the elderly from rural areas. There is a neighbor in the hometown, the family has two sons, the eldest is around the parents, the second is in the field, the two sons negotiate each family to manage the parents for a month, every time it is the turn of the second, the second let the parents live in the nursing home, because the work is busy, and busy taking care of the grandchildren. But the parents were reluctant because they lived in a nursing home and sued the second eldest in court.

But now people are generally open-minded and accept more new things, and most of our generation can accept the idea of living in a nursing home.

So in fact, even if only one child is born, the elderly can accept the idea of living in a nursing home, and the pressure on young people is actually not so great.

Only have one child, the future pension pressure is great? The truth is not necessarily what we think it is

3. Parents have a sense of old-age care

Only workers in our parents' generation have pensions, and rural people basically rely on meager savings and savings, while our parents' generation just caught up with the pressure of old-age care, did not have much savings, and caught up with the era of expensive medical care and difficult medical treatment.

But our generation will do a good job of pension planning in advance, prepare the money for the pension in advance, so that the pressure of young people's pension is not so great.

In the past, people always thought that the pension should rely on children, especially the generation of parents, who would say "raising children to prevent the elderly", and there would also be such a statement as "the elderly are here, not far away". But now people are generally open-minded, and many people agree with this view: we have children only to enjoy the process of raising children, not to keep children around.

I still agree with the view that women must have children because they want to have children and enjoy the process of having children, not because of old age, not because of persuasion from others.

What do you think about the issue of children's pension?

Only have one child, the future pension pressure is great? The truth is not necessarily what we think it is

I am a kapok mother, a mother who loves to read and learn, focusing on children's growth education, want to know more parenting knowledge, education knowledge, don't forget to pay attention to cotton mother, cotton mother will continue to output better quality content.

Read on