Yesterday I said that the guest commentator of the international judgment in the men's sneeboard U-shaped pool competition said that the mistakes of Japan's far-reaching mobilization in the game of interpreting Japanese athletes were very regrettable and regrettable, knot

Yesterday I said that the male snode board U-pool competition that is expensive for the international judgment of the guest commentary, in the interpretation of the Japanese athletes in the competition said that the mistakes of Japan's far mobilization is very regrettable and pity, the result of the Japanese athletes scored the highest 93 points in the whole field, today and listened to him explain the second round of the women's competition Japanese athletes in the second round of the competition said that the Japanese athletes in the second round is not as good as the first round, the result of the Japanese athletes in the second round of 88 points more than the first round of more than two points, in the interpretation of Cai Xuetong's third round of the game said so flawless, the ultimate performance As a result, Cai Xuetong only scored 75 points. We are not professionals who cannot judge, but what I want to ask is whether China's international planting judgment is so different from other international judgments? What would it be like if he went to plant?