Today I saw an article forwarded by a friend, a self-media author with an account named "Wu Pengfei's view", published an article, in the article, he arranged a total of 52 crimes for Liu Chuanzhi, which is not counted in Jinyu Medicine, adding up to 53 items, even so, the author is still unfinished, I hope you will add up. For this author, it was not too familiar before, it should be the self-media author who made up the rumor that Wuhan divine doctor Li Yuehua went to South Korea to treat the new crown in 2020, if it is, it is easy to understand, which is also an Internet celebrity who is not surprising and endless.
In the article, in addition to the 7 deadly sins that Sima Nan has listed, the author also put forward the remaining 46 crimes, some of which are still very interesting, and take them out to share with everyone. Suspected of not paying huge party fees in accordance with the rules; the crime of setting up assets and investment companies; the crime of manipulating public opinion; the crime of lying about the achievements of enterprises; the crime of almost destroying the dragon vein of Zhongguancun; the crime of obstructing the research and development of high-tech chips on the mainland; the crime of defrauding the official procurement of computers in the name of private enterprises, suspected of advertising and economic fraud; of course, the establishment of the Taishan Association is also because Liu Chuanzhi spreads and advocates Western values and the way capitalists live, it is certainly a crime, the most outrageous thing is that Yang Yuanqing donated 100 million yuan to his alma mater to establish a computer research center. In the eyes of the author, it is also a serious insult to the intelligence of the Chinese people. The last crime, I personally did not find from the relevant legal provisions, it is estimated that to convict the law must first be amended.
In fact, Sima Nan questioned Liu Chuanzhi, although there is still no clear conclusion, I have personally published some articles, but what I have always advocated is that if Liu Chuanzhi is really suspected of committing a crime, then naturally there will be laws to severely punish him, but no matter how we question Liu Chuanzhi, first of all, there must be conclusive evidence, not taken out of context, Sima Nan questioned the 7 problems, suspected loss of state-owned assets is the core problem, but also the only one that can convict Liu Chuanzhi, the rest of the lack of scientific and technological content, executive income, financial companies, At the very least, the composition of senior executives will not involve crimes, and if the income dares to be made public, it will certainly pay taxes according to the regulations, and the IQ of others will not be so low. Now, Sima Nan himself no longer mentions the problem of the loss of state-owned assets, does this mean that there is an answer? The material cited by Sima Nan comes from an article in Matilda in 2016, and the relevant departments have already investigated it that year, this time, Sima Nan did not provide new evidence, and the possibility of re-investigation is extremely low.
I respect everyone's right to question, but is this Mr. Wu Pengfei really helpful or funny? If you follow his logic, is It a crime for Huawei to set up a private equity company? Is it a crime for a social security fund to invest in Jinyu Medicine? Of course, how did the author list those crimes that did not exist in law? According to the level at which he wrote the article, is the article he woven an insult to the intelligence of the countrymen? This kind of person in order to hype, there is no lower limit, two years ago he made up the rumor that the divine doctor went abroad to treat diseases, although he gained traffic, but I don't know if it can also let some of them see through his true face?
Since the fermentation of Sima Nan and Lenovo incident, as a leading figure, Sima Nan and Zhang Jie's many remarks, after the secondary fermentation of many traffic anchors, have become unrecognizable, more and more sensational, everyone has played by any means for traffic, even for Some specious content of Sima Nan and Zhang Jie, they can also insert an eye-catching topic according to their own understanding, and the far-fetched release, just like the Oceanwide Group litigation lawsuit, which is obviously a normal civil dispute, How did it become that the state was investigating? Shi Yuzhu's shares were frozen, just to help friends guarantee, but also an ordinary civil dispute, but also became a liquidation of the Taishan Society, if this is the case, Shi Yuzhu can still go to the United States a few days ago? Although the content created by these traffic anchors can get some attention for the time being, in the long run, it will definitely eat up to themselves.
Network traffic anchors, although not as many fans as those big V, huge influence, but like capillaries penetrate into all aspects of society, in their own field, there are also a certain hardcore followers, should also be cautious in words and deeds, I myself am also doing self-media, every time before publishing content, will consult relevant information, try to maintain the objectivity of the content, rather than listening to the wind is rain, my views are not necessarily correct, but it only represents my cognitive level of the problem, but I will never take it out of context, I don't dare to speculate. Mainstream voices are sometimes not necessarily correct, after all, we have limited information, blindly pandering to a certain voice, and even making up bigger lies in order to cater, the harm to society is also very great, one day, it will also be abandoned by fans, because the Internet has a memory, everything has a day when it comes out, out of the water to see two legs of mud.
Many people say that I am whitewashing Liu Chuanzhi, I do not have that ability and do not have that level, I just think that there are big loopholes in Sima Nan's questioning evidence, it is impossible to come up with any results, and if everyone is like this Wu Pengfei association, then everything can not stand up to scrutiny, such people and articles, if they are also the main force questioning Liu Chuanzhi, then the possibility of becoming a climate will exist? If you want to convict Liu Chuanzhi, what you need is real evidence, not speculation and speculation, let alone a bottomless association.
I support everyone's pursuit of justice, but judging from the evidence that Sima Nan can come up with at present, success is unlikely, and as for this Mr. Wu Pengfei, to be honest, I don't see any value except for speculation. What do you think? Welcome to leave a message to discuss.