In the face of the impact of the epidemic, the UK is going to "go off the usual path"?
According to reports, British Prime Minister Johnson announced on January 19 that the British government intends to relax epidemic prevention measures from January 27.
Specifically, the previous vaccine passes and mandatory mask wearing measures will be lifted, and most of the epidemic prevention restrictions will be withdrawn from British life.
In fact, according to relevant data, there were 108069 new confirmed cases in the UK on Wednesday.
Since the number of new daily confirmed cases has exceeded 100,000, the British government should have adhered to the original strict prevention and control measures, why did Johnson do the opposite?
According to Johnson, this is because scientists believe that Omiljung has reached its peak in the country, and the confirmed case rate will drop sharply.
But is this really the case?
Maybe things are not as simple as the British government thinks. Some experts have questioned that if the UK's epidemic prevention policy measures are cancelled, the BRITISH epidemic may rebound again.
Some media broke the news that because Johnson, who was in an embarrassing situation because of the "party door", was trying to save the situation, he wanted to please critics, thus promoting the relaxation of epidemic prevention restrictions.
Some institutions have been doing a model to analyze the data after the removal of the epidemic prevention restrictions, and concluded that lifting the restrictions before the peak period in all parts of the UK has passed may lead to more hospitalizations.
On 19 December 2021, the British public waited in line outside the vaccination centre at Wembley Stadium
The head of the World Health Organization also said that as far as the New Crown of Omi kerong is concerned, "no country has come out of the predicament" and it is not the time to "give up and wave the white flag".
In fact, this wave of operations by the British government is not surprising, and many of the previous epidemic policies have caused controversy in public opinion.
Interestingly, in addition to the dissatisfaction of the British people, some people who immigrated to the UK do not seem to have a good life. Recently, two Hong Kong Internet celebrities have begun to spit on the model.
Their accusations against the British listed a number of "crimes": rigid and inflexible; hypocrisy and selfishness; the epidemic is still not wearing masks; fear of trouble and habitual blame each other. In short, they are full of disappointments in life in Britain and even miss their days in Hong Kong.
Ironically, the two Hong Kong influencers have exposed their conversations that they immigrated to the UK with BNO passports (China has no longer recognized the validity of BNO passports since January 31, 2021) and have been living for about a year.
Some Hong Kong media reported that many Hong Kong "yellow silk" (about those who supported hong Kong rioters in the 2019 Hong Kong "amendment storm") are full of illusions about immigrating to the UK, thinking that overseas is a happy land, but this is not the case.
Indeed, many of them have complained that staying in Hong Kong always feels that this is not good, that it is not good, and they have unlimited yearning for Western countries such as Britain.
Screenshot from a YouTube video
Just after the announcement of the BNO plan in the United Kingdom, many "yellow wires" rushed away, but it turned out that everything was just their own fantasy.
In addition, Lin Zibo, a former Hong Kong TVB anchor who immigrated to the Uk for half a year, also exposed himself to the new crown, and he also opened a regret and spit mode.
Unfortunately, there is no regret medicine in this world, and immigration by BNO passport is a joke after all.