Recently, the Samsung Exynos 2200 was not released as scheduled, so there were rumors that this chip may die, but just yesterday Samsung officially released the Exynos 2200.
In terms of specific specifications, Samsung Exynos 220 is built with Samsung 4nm process, the latest Arm V9 architecture, 8 cores 3 cluster design, specifically 1 Cortex X2 super core, 3 Cortex A710 large cores, and 4 Cortex A510 small cores, the storage part supports LPDDR5 memory + UFS 3.1 flash memory.
The specific frequency information has not been officially released, but in the Geekbench 5 database, the frequencies of these three cores are 2.8GHz, 2.52GHz and 1.82GHz, and compared with the Snapdragon 8 and Tianji 9000, the frequency of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is significantly lower, so it is expected that the performance will be weaker.
GPU part is the highlight of Exynos 2200, Xclipse920 GPU uses AMD RDNA2 architecture, support ray tracing and variable rate coloring and other graphics functions, AMD YES sound is relatively high in recent years, this time with the blessing of AMD technology, full of expectations is also understandable, after all, AMD GPU technology is obvious to all.
Other features, using dual-core NPU and DSP, ISP supports up to 200 million pixels single camera, 100 million pixel 30 frame video, 64MP + 32MP dual camera 30 frame video, quad camera operation, support for up to 7 image sensors, support for 4K 120Hz/2K 144Hz screen, integrated security elements, while integrating 3GPP Release 16 5G baseband, support sub-6GHz and millimeter wave bands, the chip will be used by Korean and European versions of Galaxy S22 series mobile phone debut.
Look at the parameters everyone is very good at playing, but the actual performance is often another matter, so how about the performance of the Samsung Exynos 2200? Seeing Samsung's 4nm process, I believe everyone understands it, and its frequency is significantly lower than qualcomm and MediaTek's competitors, coupled with the previous jump tickets, there is naturally not much confidence in exynos 2200.
The Internet also broke out the results of the European version of the S22 Ultra equipped with exynos 2200 processors, and the total score of Antu Rabbit was 96W+. The CPU part, in the Geekbench 5 test, single-core score 1108, multi-core 3516, while the Tianji 9000 is 1287 and 4474, Snapdragon 8 Gen1 is 1200 and 3810, the previous generation of Samsung flagship Exynos 2100 is 1102 and 3560, respectively, the CPU part seems to be standing still.
As for the expected GPU part, it was originally claimed to exceed A14, and the results in the actual test, Aztec Ruins (Normal) scored 109FPS, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen1 scored 143FPS, the difference between the two was about 30%, and in the 3DMark Wild Life test, the results of the two were 7500 and 9700, respectively, and the gap between the two was about 30%.
From the current situation, in the GPU part, the performance of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is about 30% worse than that of the Snapdragon 8 Gen, and it has not been able to surpass the A14, because the A14's performance in Aztec Ruins is 120FPS, and the performance of the previous generation's flagship Exynos 2100 in the project is 71FPS, so it is still a significant improvement compared to its own predecessor products.
From the situation of the news, Samsung Exynos 2200 in the three is the bottom of the existence, the CPU in place, although the GPU compared to the previous generation of improvement is obvious, but the original expectations are too high, as to why this is so, or Samsung 4nm process is not powerful, after the frequency goes up, energy consumption can not be suppressed, can only sacrifice performance, in exchange for energy performance.
If the test finds that the heat performance of exynos 2200 is worse than that of Snapdragon 8 Gen1, then this year's Samsung impact on high-end chips is another dream, which is also a disguised assist Snapdragon 8, in fact, from the current performance of Exynos 2200, Snapdragon 8 Gen1 does not seem to be so bad.