laitimes

When Kangxi died, if he did not pass the throne to Yongzheng, would Yongzheng rebel? Why?

I give a most curious idea to answer: Kangxi died, not passed on to Yin Chan (雍正), Yin Chan will not be reversed.

As for the reason, I give a big reason, an absolute angle, and no one disagrees.

Who is the Great Nagarant of kangxi's succession to the throne?

The princelings and the princeling clique also did not allow the princeling clique to rise and fall, and when kangxi planned to move, the princelings and the princeling clique did not even have any room for resistance.

The old Eight Yin Yu thought that he had "united" the Manchu Dynasty Wenwu, but was cleaned up by Kangxi who borrowed two Hai Dongqing and completely withdrew from the succession dispute.

Fourteen Yin Yu or old Four Yin Chan, old nine old ten or not, they are all Kangxi's small dishes, Kangxi is the chef, cooking the country limin choose "follow-up spoon person", that is Kangxi's business!

It's not this brother, that prince's business.

This matter is clear, Kangxi is the great master of the great treasure, the big boss, he is responsible for this matter.

When Kangxi died, if he did not pass the throne to Yongzheng, would Yongzheng rebel? Why?

After Kangxi passed the throne to Yin Chan (Yongzheng), did the old eighth, the ninth, the tenth, and the fourteenth rebel?

Because there are no such conditions, including military, political, and personnel conditions, there is no such thing.

Why are there no conditions?

Because Kangxi put things to rest in advance.

After Kangxi discovered that Crown Prince Yinrong did not have the Achilles heel of controlling courtiers and was easily controlled by courtiers anyway, he planned to reshuffle the cards and re-elect a successor to the Qing Dynasty.

So he deposed the prince, and then the princes "had their own intentions", each of them showed their abilities, and staged a super-burning drama of "nine sons and nine wives".

Kangxi liked the princes like this, the water was muddy, he could see which fish had the most survival ability, the Great Qing Dynasty must be handed over to the hands of "capable people, fierce people", the old fourth Yinchen opportunity came, Kangxi also understood.

But Kangxi had to solve the old Eight Yin Yu, why? Because Yin Yu is the most "zero-sum" person, what does it mean? The old eight yin were exquisite on all sides, mingling with the old nine old ten old fourteen brothers and a number of courtiers, and on the surface he had gained wide support, but in fact, if he inherited the unification, he would have to care for and even indulge these brothers and courtiers. In essence, he must be subject to courtiers, which is the most dangerous situation as a monarch.

Therefore, Kangxi got rid of the old eight in advance, suppressed the old nine and ten, and sent the old fourteen. They had no strength to rebel after Yin Chan ascended the throne, and this was done by Kangxi.

If Kangxi passed the throne to Old Eight Yin Yu or Old Fourteen Yin Yu, would Old Fourth Yin Chan rebel?

No, he will be destroyed quickly, much faster than he will be able to collapse the old eight old nine old ten old fourteen!

Because the brothers were all the same thing, relying on each other, and the only thing that the old fourth YinChen relied on was Kangxi, if Kangxi died and did not pass on to him, he would only have one way to die.

Therefore, if the other brothers inherited the unification, Yin Chan would not rebel, because he could not even save his life.

And his "Iron Hat King" Old Thirteen Yin Xiang was still locked up in the Zongren Mansion, and there would be no one to help him.

When Kangxi died, if he did not pass the throne to Yongzheng, would Yongzheng rebel? Why?

Therefore, this angle is adjusted, and everyone can see clearly that whether the new emperor can take the throne is not the problem of the new emperor, it is all Kangxi who is in charge!

Such a shrewd person as Kangxi, no matter which son he wants to raise to the throne, he will not cause any major problems! rebel? That's even more unlikely!

After Emperor Taiji ascended the throne, he forced Azig, Dolgun, and Dordor's mother, Abhay, to accompany Nurhaci to bury him. At that time, Abhay was only 37 years old, and according to the custom of jurchens, after Nurhaci's death, his concubines could marry Nurhaci's sons. If that were the case, Abahai would have to ally himself with Daishan, and the future situation of Emperor Taiji would be particularly hanging.

Therefore, emperor Taiji only assumed to be the will of Tonur Hachi after he was about to take the throne: let the grand concubine Abhay be buried.

The three Azig brothers, who were sons, did not dare to say a word of opposition, let alone rebellion.

Later, Dorgon's power fell to the world, and there was no rebellion between Emperor Taiji and Shunzhi.

After the golden people have this urine nature: admit to gambling and lose, the overall situation is important!

When Kangxi died, if he did not pass the throne to Yongzheng, would Yongzheng rebel? Why?

Therefore, no one in the Kangxi Tradition will be a rebel.

Throughout the history of the Qing Dynasty, do you see that there were any rebels against the newly enthroned emperor?

Back to the beginning of the question: Kangxi died, not passed on to Yin Chan (雍正), Yin Chan will not be reversed. Because Kangxi didn't design this bridge for him!

I am Lin Can, like to pay attention to.

Read on