And when they were in a stalemate with Chenggao, Peng Yue counted against Liangdi, absolutely Chu grain, and Xiang Wangzhi suffered. For the sake of Gao Li, he put Taigong on it and told the King of Han: "Don't be in a hurry now, I cook Taigong." The King of Han said: "I and Xiang Yu jubei were appointed to the king of Huai, known as 'about brothers', Wu Weng is Ruo Weng, will want to cook and Weng, then fortunately share a piece of my soup..." - "Xiang Yu Benji".
Epic psychological warfare
Xiang Yu was not cooked to send to Liu Bang, Xiang Yu was a nobleman with the pride of an aristocrat, so Xiang Yu was praised as a hero by posterity. But this is also why Liu Bang can win the world, what form to fight what kind of battle, now is the time to fight psychological warfare, after saying it, run, or hide, run to save his father, do not run, will definitely be boiled.
Liu Bang knew that Xiang Yu was a famous person, and he stressed benevolence and morality, but if Liu Bang and Xiang Yu were to adjust, Liu Bang would not necessarily kill Xiang Yu's father, and killing Xiang Yu and his father would not be beneficial (if he was still alive), it would only let Xiang Yu beat him in the name of revenge, and then Liu Bang would lose money, Xiang Yu would be righteous and strong, morale would be high, Liu Bang could suffer losses, Liu Bang was not smart, but he was not a fool, this stake could still be seen through, not to mention that there were Zhang Liang and other people under him.
Liu Bang, as the Kaiyuan Emperor, must have a very high IQ and emotional intelligence, otherwise he would not have absorbed Zhang Liangxiao, He Chen Ping, and others for his use. These people are all the top talents, and their origins are more noble than Liu Bang, and they are absolutely smart people who can control people! It can only be said that Liu Bang's cultural level is not high, the theoretical foundation is not good, and many things are done by intuition, which in turn proves that Liu Bang was born with a good brain, not only using people to make good use of them, but also always making the best decisions.
To say that Liu Bang is a villain, the winner rewrites history, who saw it next to him? Xiang Yu doesn't want to be the lord of the world? He didn't have that talent, so he didn't have Liu Bangqiang, who didn't want to be emperor? His defeat shows that he is a weak man, a man who leads his troops to seize the world, do you say that he has not killed anyone, has not made a plan? Then he cannot be said to be a good man and nobleman, but only a tyrant.
The sentence that the winner is the king and the loser is Kou still makes sense, Xiang Yu's indecisiveness, short-sightedness, complacency, and courageous character are destined not to be the emperor's material! Liu Bang attached great importance to talent, resourcefulness, and ability to bend and stretch, and created China's first Han Dynasty: the Western Han Dynasty, because the Western Han Dynasty was strong, and the Chinese ethnic groups were called Han Nationality, which had a great influence on the second dry year of China and Chinese culture.
Moreover, Liu Bang did not vilify Xiang Yu when he won the world, on the one hand, although this could improve his own reputation higher, on the other hand, Xiang Yu was indeed a big hero.
They are all emperors who have been dead for thousands of years, no one washes the ground for anyone, they are all about the obvious facts, but they are not willing to believe it, they are not willing to put themselves in the shoes of others! Somewhat meaningful is that reading the historical records I saw Liu Bang's political literacy, no matter how big a problem he encountered, even if he was about to die or suddenly hit an arrow, he could still consider the overall situation without being afraid of danger, kicking the child or taking a piece of the pie, saying this sentence in this environment, whether it was political literacy, or the overall situation, or the deep understanding of human nature or the understanding of Xiang Yu too much, eat him! Isn't that great wisdom? Can't the results not be the best proof?
Even if Liu Bang wants to express "even my father I don't want, you Xiang Yu can't catch my handle", will he openly say "share my share of the soup"? I don't quite understand. No one is a fool, an emperor who says such a thing is more expensive, and he really thinks so in his heart and can't come out. Moreover, the army is there, and this explanation clearly shakes the hearts and minds of the army. I think as long as Liu Bang has an IQ, he will not say these things without being sure to let Xiang Yu take it. Although I think that Liu Bang's words are not generally risky, the brain circuits are also relatively strange. But I don't think the question alone is hooligan instinct.
This question can actually be explained in a simple way. Take a scene often seen on TV dramas: either you die or I die at the moment of life and death, the male protagonist holds a gun to the enemy who does not wear the same heaven, and the enemy strangles the neck of the heroine (the beloved of the male protagonist) with one hand, and holds the gun against her head with the other: whoever you put down the gun, otherwise I will kill her!
Whoever thinks about it again and again: Well, I'll put the gun down, and you won't hurt her.
I think in addition to TV dramas and idiots, who in reality will do this, who can do this?
If you release the gun, not only will both people die! If you don't release the gun, at least the other side is still jealous, does not dare to act rashly, and can also negotiate. So the actual effect is that putting down the gun is not to save people at all, but to die together, not even to fight for the opportunity to live. On the surface, it seems to be self-sacrifice and responsibility, but in fact it is extremely stupid and irresponsible!
This is a very simple truth that as long as people with normal thinking understand it!
Therefore, it is not for Liu Bang to wash the floor and be tough and correct.
"Get a piece of the pie" why not lead to a mutiny among the soldiers
If Liu Bang had surrendered for his father's sake. Liu Bang's men would mutiny.
cause:
Follow you Liu Bang to fight the world in order to be able to seal his wife and son in the future, glory and wealth, and as a result, you Liu Bang surrendered for your father and sold us all. I'm not against you, what are you waiting for.
You Liu Bang surrendered, Xiang Yu really may not kill you. But our fate must refer to the 200,000 Qin troops under Zhang Handan. We're not waiting for anything.
Could it be clear to those soldiers at the bottom that it would not be my fault that our lord would set up another trap for the other side and force him to the point of inhumanity and injustice? The first meaning that ordinary people heard from that sentence should be that Liu Bang did not hesitate to achieve the goal, otherwise there would not be so many people scolding Liu Bang. As for why there is no reaction, it may be related to Liu Bang's rule of the army and other aspects, but it comes down to the maximization of strategic interests, and it is obviously not from the perspective of soldiers.
Not to mention that filial piety is really begun to be exquisite after the confucian art, even if the boss is really treacherous, no one is willing to follow him? Have you considered the feelings of Fang Xuanling and Li Jing? Even if you know you're going to cross the river and tear down the bridge? Do you want to earn a fortune first, or do you want to be a deserter first for the birds that don't necessarily appear? Don't say that the Qin and Han dynasties with no experience, that is, in the Ming and Qing dynasties, there are still people who conquer the world for the emperor in order to be crowned king, do you think of Kong Youde and Wu Sangui? Didn't they know that the emperor couldn't tolerate them? What about him, first earn the rich and noble, and then say, if not then, then consider the opposite.
In fact, it was only by shouting that Xiang Yu was most likely (only possible, of course) to spare his father.
When threatened, it is only possible to get rid of the threat if you do the best you can to devalue what your opponent threatens.
If he just wanted to make the creeps happy, he would just shout a bunch of beautiful words in awe, and really thought he wouldn't shout?
Even if Xiang Yu really killed his father, he also gave a piece of the pie. I reckon that Liu Bang would only bury that cup of soup to consolidate his ranks. Then alienate Xiang Yu's men, it is best to dig them up, as for whether it is used or not, it is another story.
The positioning of the hero is different
Governing the country is more of a sage and a saint, but one thing is inevitable, those who govern the country and the state must rely on the former if they do not stand out in the chaotic world. Xiang Yu's greatest historical achievement was the greatest power to overthrow the violent Qin, and this was enough. The other front and back sides make Xiang Yu's image more three-dimensional, more faceted, not small shortcomings, but also humane (compared with Liu Bang pushing children).
To put it bluntly, a hero with extremely strong military ability in history must be a hero, and Xiang Yu's military ability is extremely strong, so he is a hero.
As for the many reasons for the defeat of the war, it must be inseparable from his personality, and because he is the co-lord of the world, he will attack him en masse.
In addition, Xiang Yu's image has really become more cute because of the scene with the concubine, including Wujiang self-murder.
As for the Fuehrer and Meiji, let's look at the home country aside. They all led their countries to a glorious moment in history. Speaking of their country, even if they are obviously sinners (in fact, Meiji is better), many people will still be proud when the people of other countries recall them (just like we recall Datang).
It is not wise to look at the ancients with the eyes of its practical modern people, and it is not wise to blindly imprison the ancients with modern values, such as slaughtering the city and dividing the seals.
People worship historical figures on two grounds: their historical contributions, the spiritual qualities they express, or the things that their symbols represent. One or the other. Xiang Yu's historical contribution was the greatest force to overthrow the Qin Dynasty, and the spiritual quality he expressed was the love for the people he loved, the hatred of the people he hated, and the brightness of his actions (force and conspiracy). As for self-indulgence, I personally think that most rulers are a common disease, and the instructors most admire who need not say more.
Xiang Yu must not be a gentleman, he is a hero. Heroes must have shortcomings, but heroes understand feelings and value feelings. For Xiang Yu, compared to Yu Ji, what did the earthly disturbances count?
After all, the ancients had their limitations. We now see that feudalism can indeed be effectively inherited, but it is still too new and Qin has collapsed in a short period of time. Xiang Yu's restoration was not too much of a problem, but he did more lack of virtue than Liu Bang. However, in addition to Xiang Yu's military ability to crush Liu Bang, his vision, courage, and political ability were all crushed, and his opponents were also hidden by birds, but Liu Bang was stronger than Xiang Yu.
The general idea of the literati throughout the ages was that "the behavior of the nobility must be correct". Xiang Yu was a nobleman, so he had to be beautified, and If Liu Bang was not a nobleman and killed Xiang Yu, he had to be overthrown. To be reasonable and logical, it depends on whether the logic of reason and the concept are in conflict, if it is not, it can be used, and if it is, it will be thrown away - the concept of faith is higher than logic. The root cause is that the literati all want to become aristocrats or be attached to the nobility, and if they vilify the nobility, they will not be able to live with their own future and belly. If the nobles kill the nobles, or the commoners kill the commoners, then the logic of the literati's writing will be much stronger and more just. Xiang Yu wants to cook and kill Liu Bang's father, Liu Bang: We are brothers, when cooking your father, I will share a piece of the pie.