On January 5, Xinhua News Agency released a video praising and praising Lenovo Group, which roughly explained the outstanding contributions made by Lenovo Group in technology research and development and industrial prosperity in the 38 years since its establishment.
As soon as this video was released, it immediately triggered a heated discussion among domestic netizens, many people complained that "Xinhua News Agency was kidnapped by Lenovo", and now the doubts about Lenovo have not subsided, at this time, Xinhua News Agency as an official media post to praise Lenovo is not appropriate?
While everyone was talking about it, Xinhua News Agency quietly removed this video, and for a time domestic public opinion exploded. Is there a problem with Lenovo? Can Xinhua News Agency's voice represent the attitude of the state? For a time, the answers to these questions became the focus of everyone's attention.
The listing plan was shattered, and Lenovo's "circle money" failed
In fact, the domestic people's doubts about Lenovo have not been calmed down since the "Ni Liu controversy", when Ni Guangnan, who advocated taking the technical school, was marginalized and finally had no choice but to run away, and since then, the nature of Lenovo's enterprise has undergone tremendous changes. Lenovo has gradually transformed from a former technology company to a more like a commercial company that sells computers, which can't help but make many people feel sorry.
However, in October last year, Lenovo announced to the outside world that it would be listed on the Science and Technology Innovation Board, and this news immediately triggered domestic public opinion. Some people think that Lenovo does not meet the listing qualifications, many people have a certain understanding of the listing of the science and technology innovation board, as the state in order to stimulate the science and technology innovation enterprises to create the stock market sector, the listing of the science and technology innovation board compared to other nature of the stock market listing conditions are more stringent and more restrictive.
However, Lenovo does not seem to meet the listing criteria in many ways, so why did it easily pass the review? Many people are skeptical about this.
First of all, people are skeptical about the identity of Lenovo's technology innovation company. Everyone believes that Lenovo's contribution to scientific and technological innovation is very limited, and there are not many scientific and technological innovation projects with development potential. Is it too far-fetched to define Lenovo as a technologically innovative enterprise?
Secondly, Lenovo's current debt ratio is as high as 90%, in this case, it is believed that Lenovo has a high risk control ability, is the attitude a little too optimistic? In addition, Lenovo has always been relatively close to Laomei Capital. This time Lenovo suddenly announced the listing will not have impure motives, what secrets are hidden behind it?
Most netizens think that it is not very rational to hastily approve lenovo's listing before these situations are clarified. Subsequently, the securities regulatory department also issued an announcement, saying that Lenovo did not fully meet the criteria for listing on the Science and Technology Innovation Board, rejected Lenovo's listing request, and investigated the enterprises and a number of personnel who sponsored Lenovo's listing. In this way, Lenovo's listing plan was "aborted".
Sima Nan's questioning, heavy hammer association
If the problem of the listing plan was only to let Lenovo miss a good opportunity for financing, then Sima Nan's "six questions Lenovo" was to completely and completely clean up Lenovo. Among them, Sima Nan mentioned many sharp and sensitive issues, which shocked everyone who watched the video. On the one hand, people admire Sima Nan's courage and courage to expose the darkness, on the other hand, they are also surprised that there are so many hidden secrets behind Lenovo.
However, what is even more difficult for Lenovo to accept is that every point of view of Sima Nan is justified, and there is no room for any rebuttal of Lenovo. How Lenovo's major shareholders play with equity to put money in their pockets; Lenovo's debt ratio is as high as 90%, why the compensation of board members can be as high as 30 million; how much money Lenovo owes to suppliers... These problems Sima Nan has made an in-depth analysis for everyone in the video.
After the release of the video, many people thought that Lenovo would definitely find a way to public relations and explanation, but what shocked everyone was that Lenovo was surprisingly calm this time, no statement, no lawyer letter, no resistance, and many people doubted whether Lenovo had admitted it. As soon as the incident came out, everyone was waiting for the relevant state departments to give a reasonable investigation result and a way to deal with it.
Xinhua News Agency "hit the round field"?
Just when everyone was focusing on the results of the handling of the incident, Xinhua News Agency released such a video, which not only made many people think about it, but also wanted to go down to "play the round field" for Lenovo? When everyone was talking about it, Xinhua News Agency quietly put down the video, and the domestic netizens began to sit still, and everyone was speculating about what kind of views Xinhua News Agency wanted to express with such a move.
Many people think that the view of the official media on this matter is of great significance, but at present, it seems that the attitude of Xinhua News Agency to the Lenovo incident is not clear. Guys, what do you think is the significance of Xinhua's move, and what kind of emotion does it have to quickly delete after the video is released?
After the official media sent a video praise, it was quickly deleted, and Lenovo's "whitewashing" failed?
Xinhua News Agency "praises" Lenovo, a failed "round field"