Recently, the Beijing Education Commission released a bombshell news concerning all parents and students.
The news announced that there will be a major change in the admission policy for students in the compulsory teaching stage, and the previous multi-effect zoning admission method will be changed to registration-based.
This is undoubtedly a bombshell in the water of the lake of education!
This is not only a change in the enrollment policy, but also involves the school district housing that people valued in the past.
Loading...
The problem of children's enrollment has always been a problem that parents try their best to reduce their heads.
In the past, the issue of children's enrollment has been multi-school zoning, which has given rise to school district housing, which is contrary to educational equity.
If you want to enter a key school and a good school, you have to buy a house in the area, which is the consensus of many parents.
It is this consensus that has caused the housing prices in the good school area to rise, and although the prices are high, they are still being snatched up by powerful and wealthy parents.
Therefore, the school district room has become the key to the division of classes, and it has also become the threshold of educational stratification.
The school district house is like a child's pass to a good school, and parents who cannot afford to buy a school district house will naturally not be able to enjoy high-quality educational resources for their children.
Therefore, this method of enrollment has created a concentration of good educational resources in the upper class, while the lower classes in society have no access to excellent educational resources at all.
There is no such thing as equity in education! Education is only relatively fair within a certain class!
So, what is the impact of the new enrollment?
Some argue that this not only heralds a reform of education policy, but also a change in the real estate market.
For real estate, enrollment does not depend on the division of the district, then the value of the school district housing will be greatly reduced.
If real estate wants to continue to be linked to the education industry, the practice of profiting from education needs to be reconsidered.
From this point of view, it is great news for those who have not been able to buy a school district house, which means that their children will be able to be allocated good educational resources without being limited by housing.
And for those who have spent a lot of money to buy a school district house, it is obviously a little difficult to accept, and the school district house that they have spent a lot of money on is likely to come in handy.
In any case, reform is bound to offend the interests of some people, and this is the inevitable pain of reform.
However, does enrollment necessarily mean fairness?
Although this policy has made a more equitable distribution of educational resources than before, so that good education is no longer the exclusive resource of one class, and opens up the gap between other class and access to high-quality educational resources.
But for those who don't have any money, isn't it easier to enroll in school?
In fact, it is very difficult to achieve equity in education. Although the class of society is not recognized, it exists objectively.
The upper class is more able to enjoy high-quality educational resources than the lower class.
Therefore, it is difficult to achieve educational equity in the context of limited quality educational resources.
In order to achieve true educational equity, we must first break down the barriers of distribution and focus on optimizing our educational resources.
When the society can achieve extremely rich and shared high-quality educational resources, there will not be much difference between what area and what kind of enrollment is registered.
Therefore, instead of formulating various policies, it is better to focus on optimizing educational resources.
Efforts should be made to upgrade educational facilities, improve the level and ability of teachers in various localities, especially in townships and towns, and gradually narrow and narrow the gap between urban and rural education.
Only on this basis can we truly achieve educational equity, so that every child can enjoy the same education as everyone else, no matter when they are or where they are, which is fairness.
As soon as the policy came out, it also aroused the concerns of the majority of netizens.
Some people believe that the way of enrollment will breed greater educational injustice than school district housing, at least the school district room is the standard of admission on the surface, and there is no unified standard for enrollment in school, which means that there will be a lot of room for maneuver.
The worries of netizens are exactly what many parents are worried about. There are too many education insiders, and the policy may be good, but it may not be the case when implemented.
As the so-called policies on the top, there are countermeasures on the bottom, going through the back door, pulling relationships, engaging in favors, and changing the order of enrollment are simply too easy to operate, and the operation does not leave a trace.
What do netizens think about this?