Dear viewers, hello everyone! If you like what we share, please don't skimp on your likes, shares, and retweets, your support is what keeps us going. Here, Evening Breeze sincerely wishes you all good luck in the Year of the Dragon, everything goes well, wealth is rolling in, and your dreams come true as soon as possible!
In ordinary families, children's education is always one of the most headache issues for parents. How to let children get the best educational resources has become the goal pursued by every parent.
A job posting in the society undoubtedly drew a strong stroke on this pursuit.
In order to prepare for a second-grade girl to study in Hong Kong, her parents offered an annual salary of 500,000 yuan to hire a tutor, and this generous remuneration immediately sparked widespread discussion in the society.
The daily salary is 15,000, which is equivalent to the income of many people for a month of hard work, which is unprecedented in the tutoring industry.
In fact, this is not simply for a second-grade student's homework help, but the parents' high expectations for their children's future.
Retired teachers and those with solid math skills are preferred, and this kind of conditional screening is not just a tutor, but more like customizing a comprehensive learning and growth environment for children.
But, behind this, a crack in thinking began to be revealed. Behind the annual salary of 500,000 yuan is a demonstration of the ability to absolutely control educational resources.
According to statistics, those who are willing and able to pay such high tutoring fees have an annual income of at least one million.
In society as a whole, such families are definitely in the minority. This has undoubtedly pushed the distribution of educational resources to the brink of new polarization.
In this context, it is not difficult to think about the question of whether children from ordinary families still have a chance to catch up in the face of such expensive personalized education.
To this, the market has already issued a response. As proof of going against the current, there is now no shortage of highly educated and even returnees in the market who are willing to join the ranks of tutors, and their annual salaries have reached between 400,000 and 600,000 yuan, which is quite a considerable figure for many industries.
There seems to be a relatively closed circle between families who are willing to pay high fees for education and high-quality teachers, and the threshold of this cycle is difficult for most families to cross.
Behind this, does it mean that the individualization and high value of education will be exclusive to a certain class? Can this high concentration of educational resources truly cultivate the all-round talents that society needs, or will it only exacerbate social inequality?
On the other hand, what will be the future of those children who have not entered this cycle? As mentioned in the article, in the recent market, even the students who graduated from 211 and 985 do not appear to be prominent in the tutoring market.
The involution of academic qualifications seems to indicate that the future competition in education is not only in terms of content, but also in terms of resources.
In this competition and distribution of educational resources, do children from ordinary families still have a chance to turn over? Or, on the scales of education, have they been placed in a position of disadvantage by default?
Under such circumstances, can the original purpose of education still be preserved and realized, or are we gradually moving away from the original intention of educational equity?
This recruitment information is not only a display of individual cases, but also a mirror, reflecting the real picture of the current distribution of social education resources.
In such a scene, every family, every child, must face a reality - education is becoming a contest of resources and opportunities.
In this competition, how to give every child a fair starting line may be a question that every member of society should think about.
The pictures used in this article are all from public resources on the Internet, aiming to promote positive social energy and resolutely avoid the spread of any vulgar or bad information.
If the content of this article involves copyright or portrait rights, please contact us in a timely manner, and we will take immediate measures to delete the relevant content to protect your legitimate rights and interests.