Now there are many children with single-digit grades in primary school, so it is necessary to divide the high school entrance examination!

There are always many people who hope that the state will cancel the diversion of the high school entrance examination, so that children can go to high school and have the opportunity to enter universities in the future. In the eyes of these people, there is still a lot of uncertainty about the future of fourteen or fifteen-year-old children, so they should be given a chance, rather than shunting them out early.

As an educator, I also hope that all children can be admitted to college, but the reality is cruel. Especially in recent years, it has been increasingly found that the diversion of the high school entrance examination is still very correct, because the phenomenon of student polarization is really beyond everyone's imagination. There are already a lot of single-digit children in elementary school today, does it really make sense for these children to go to high school?

First: The situation of students today is different from that of the past, the phenomenon of polarization is very serious, and the poor students are really poor, almost nothing.

There are bad students in all eras, but the bad students now are really different from the past, and the difference is beyond everyone's imagination.

Because in the past, the school allowed repeating grades, and only those who passed the grades were allowed to be promoted, and if the grades were unqualified, they continued to repeat the grade, so the overall level gap of students was not very large, and the worst students would not know anything. But now it is completely different, our education is not allowed to repeat grades, even if children score more than ten or even less in the exam, they are not allowed to repeat grades, which has caused some children to get worse and worse, and they can't keep up at all.

I am in a key primary school in the county, and the overall teaching quality of the school ranks among the top three in the county. But there are already about five students in each class who will never pass, and some of them have even single-digit grades, and the fifth-grade children can't even do basic multiplication and division, and they are messing around at school every day. Children in other schools are even worse, especially children in rural primary schools, where there are few students in each class with a score of 80 or more, and almost all of them fail. Is it meaningful for such a group of kids to send them to high school? Isn't it just a waste of three years?

Second: Most of the current poor students are caused by family education, which is difficult to change and counterattack.

Many people want to cancel the diversion of the high school entrance examination, just to give poor students a chance, a chance to counterattack and turn the tables. But to be honest, most of the current poor students are caused by family education, and it is difficult to change in the short term.

The problems of family education are mainly manifested in the following: parents do not know enough and do not pay attention to their children's studies at all; left-behind children, parents have no time to educate their children; parents connive at their children and give them a bad condition; children have a rebellious personality and parents cannot control their children at all, and so on. However, it is very difficult for the original family to change in the short term, and it will not change even for a long time, so how can children counterattack? Can it be relied on the children themselves to wake up? How many teenage children will suddenly work hard to study? Besides, even if they want to study hard, the foundation is too weak, how easy is it to keep up?

But as long as parents pay a little attention to their children's education, they will not let their children become very bad, let alone regret it when their children fall behind, they may have found a way to remedy it early on!

There is really no need for a poor student to go to high school, otherwise it will only waste three years in vain.

Many parents are unwilling, just because they feel very faceless, and their children have not been admitted to high school. But it never occurred to them that even if they let their children go to high school, would they really understand the lessons?

Many junior high school graduates have a total score of less than 200 or 300 points, with an average of 30 or 40 points per subject, and may not even know the basic concept theorems. Can they really learn such a difficult course as high school? How can many students who are normally admitted still not be able to learn it? How can they learn it? Is it possible that their IQ has suddenly increased?

Instead of wasting three years of time not understanding the class, it is better to go to a vocational school to learn technology. The most important thing is not to delay the study of outstanding students, so that high schools can have more energy to focus on cultivating those outstanding students and cultivate more talents for the country.

Write at the end:

Any child who can't even get into high school really has no hope of counterattacking, after all, as long as he is a middle student in the class, he can go to high school. Of course, this will indeed increase educational anxiety and increase the burden on students. However, there is more than one way to go to college, and it is unrealistic to let all children go to college.

What do you think about this?