This time the Golden Rooster Awards overturned? As soon as the shortlist came out, the audience called out that the domestic entertainment movie was really over
The "first shot" of the summer file "Disappearing Her" began, but the long-awaited audience found that Wang Baoqiang's 6-year-dormant overturn work "In the Octagon Cage", and the final glory of "All or Nothing" that witnessed the last glory of this summer, did not even get a piece of the pie. These two movies have an excellent reputation in the industry, are there no better movies than them in the past two years?
However, the results of the Golden Rooster Award were eye-popping. Those films that have lost money at the box office, such as "Nameless", although they have a bit of a reputation, are not recognized by the general audience; And "The King of the Long Sky" and "Chinese Table Tennis Jedi Strikes Back" made Deng Chao fiercely planted. It's puzzling that these movies don't do well at the box office!
This makes people wonder: what are the selection criteria for the Golden Rooster Award? Is it just the word of mouth of the movie as the only criterion? Can such an award really represent the highest level of Chinese cinema?
In fact, for the audience, they are more concerned about those movies that can touch people's hearts, rather than films that rely only on word of mouth and lack actual box office performance. As one of the highest honors of Chinese films, the Golden Rooster Award should pay more attention to the combination of actual box office and audience word of mouth, rather than relying solely on word of mouth to determine the list of winners.
In general, the results of the Golden Rooster Award have aroused widespread discussion and questioning. I hope to see more fair, objective and comprehensive selection criteria in the future, so that truly outstanding film works can get the honor and recognition they deserve. After all, the Chinese film market needs more excellent works to drive its development.
