Recently, the topic of Jiang Fangzhou on the Internet has been hyped up very hot, and the Internet has been pulled out to say that many people have been invited to visit Japan, like Jiang Fangzhou, who lives in Japan for a year and can get 20,000 yuan a month. When these people finally return home, they will say that Japan is not bad.
Many people say that this is being bribed by the Japanese, this is a traitor, it is a spy.
Today we're going to talk about that.
First, public diplomacy is a very common thing that every country does.
Foreigners are doing it, and we are doing it, but we call it the united front.
Interact with the social and non-governmental people of some countries, so as to achieve the purpose of promoting the national image and national concept, and improving the relations between the two countries, that is, public diplomacy.
Some time ago, there was a scandal in Japan, and the agency also entertained Abe's son to eat and drink for the sake of budget.
Eating and drinking from the national budget is easy to criticize by the public, but if we use academic terms, this is public diplomacy.
Our work of overseas Chinese and overseas friendly people is similar. Every year, many foreigners come to our country to eat, drink, and walk around.
Although many people on the Internet are very angry and say that this is a foreign infiltration of us, frankly speaking, this is just a normal situation of public diplomacy.
Second, in public diplomacy, it is also very common to deepen the development of deeper intelligence cooperation, and almost all countries have such an idea.
They tend to identify those who are suitable for further development in the process of public diplomacy.
Japan is very good at public diplomacy, and at the same time the country is a country with a national intelligence system.
This is a very sensitive part of public diplomacy. If it is just friendly exchanges, it is harmless, but many countries add private goods in it. I want to directly establish a relationship person, or even establish intelligence cooperation.
For this situation, maintaining vigilance is a basic requirement. What can be done, what cannot be done, what can be said, and what cannot be said, it is still necessary to have a clear understanding. People and subjects involved in public diplomacy must have their own minds, and the foreign-related environment is very complicated. Many college students I know have had similar situations. But these gentlemen have resolutely refused, and some will even be harassed and interrupted from cooperation.
Now that jiang Fangzhou is attacking Jiang Fangzhou on the Internet, I personally feel that she is a small literary and artistic youth, and it is easier for literary and artistic youth to be fooled. When I arrived in Japan, I felt that everything was fine, and it was normal to say something with a little flattery, which is also the effect that public diplomacy hopes to achieve.
We also invite foreigners to come in the hope that he will say that China is good, the Chinese model is good, the Chinese and the people are good.
The articles written by Jiang Fangzhou during the Japanese period are basically similar to the so-called "China is good, the Chinese model is good, the Chinese and the people are good", that is, politeness in the general sense.
Therefore, public diplomacy cannot let down its vigilance, especially for a country like Japan, where all people are intelligence agencies. There must always be a thread in the heart. But it is not just a trip to Japan, a few good words, we are all spies and traitors, we still have to have self-confidence, have determination.
Finally, we need to pay special attention to those who accuse others of foreign affairs at every turn.
Now foreign relations are relatively good, it is better to say that once foreign relations become complicated, some normal international exchanges and academic discussions may trigger public opinion risks.
This accusation of being too sensitive to diplomacy will continue if it continues. Normal people-to-people exchanges, foreign-related conferences, and academic visits are at risk of being interrupted entirely. In the end, cultural exchanges were decoupled, which was the result that the United States had always hoped for.
As a rising power, China should have self-confidence in public diplomacy. We open the door to the country and invite friends to see, which is more convincing than anything.
In the era of globalization, many things should be treated normally. You have me, I have you, communication and struggle are together; be vigilant, open-minded, cautious and confident. This is a consensus that the Chinese people and the Chinese cultural circles must have.
Public diplomacy is the part we have always strengthened, and the general secretary said that we must tell the Chinese story well, and to tell the Chinese story well, it is certainly not enough to rely on the official alone.
I hope that after our people go out, they will not only promote cultural exchanges between China and foreign countries, but more importantly, they will take advantage of this opportunity to tell Chinese stories as well as possible.