laitimes

Recently, senior officers who dare to question the use of US military spending have caught fire, saying: If it is calculated at parity purchasing power to improve the same level of combat effectiveness, the US military will spend $20, while China only needs to spend

author:Political Brother Fund Life

Recently, senior officers who dare to question the use of US military spending are on fire, he said: If it is calculated at parity purchasing power to improve the same level of combat effectiveness, the US military will spend 20 US dollars, while China only needs to spend 1 US dollars, if the United States can not figure out how to reduce costs, then failure is inevitable [Yaya]

I think he said a bit exaggerated, but the U.S. military equipment under the military-industrial complex is really expensive, especially the coffee pot, which is an electric kettle, the price is $1280, it is estimated that the sale to the U.S. military is certainly not discounted [cover your face]

Recently, senior officers who dare to question the use of US military spending have caught fire, saying: If it is calculated at parity purchasing power to improve the same level of combat effectiveness, the US military will spend $20, while China only needs to spend
Recently, senior officers who dare to question the use of US military spending have caught fire, saying: If it is calculated at parity purchasing power to improve the same level of combat effectiveness, the US military will spend $20, while China only needs to spend
Recently, senior officers who dare to question the use of US military spending have caught fire, saying: If it is calculated at parity purchasing power to improve the same level of combat effectiveness, the US military will spend $20, while China only needs to spend

Read on