laitimes

Buying a bottle of wine but receiving two couriers, one of which is empty? This action by the seller may be a violation of privacy

Recently, Mr. Qiao, who lives in Chengdu, bought a bottle of liquor at a Taobao store, but unexpectedly received two packages. One was sent through Jingdong Logistics, which contained the liquor purchased by Mr. Qiao; the other was sent through Yuantong Express, which contained waste carton pieces. What's going on?

Mr. Qiao found a Taobao store selling wine to inquire, but did not expect that although the two packages were shipped at different locations, they were both issued by the store. The other party said that because the goods need to be shipped through JD Logistics, but cannot be matched to the Tmall backstage, it is necessary to use another express number to match.

Mr. Qiao believes that the store violated its own privacy by providing its personal delivery information to another courier company without his consent.

Buying a bottle of wine but receiving two couriers, one of which is empty? This action by the seller may be a violation of privacy

Pieces of waste paper received by Mr. Joe

customer:

Buy a bottle of liquor at the online store

Instead, two packages were received, one of which was empty

On February 17, Mr. Qiao, who lives in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, bought a bottle of liquor worth 199 yuan at a Taobao store.

On February 21, Mr. Qiao received the liquor from the courier, but the courier progressed to indicate that he still had a copy of his own package being sent to Chengdu. Mr. Qiao was a little confused at that time, he had only recently bought this bottle of wine, how could he still have a courier to be delivered?

When Mr. Qiao received the package, he took it apart and looked at it, and found that it was just a piece of paper in a waste cardboard box.

Mr. Qiao found that the wine was sent through Jingdong Express, and the delivery place was Daxing, Beijing, while the waste paper pieces were sent through Yuantong Express, and the delivery place was Langfang City, Hebei Province.

Mr. Qiao called the Yuantong courier to ask what was going on, and the courier explained that the empty package may have been an online store in order to brush the order. Subsequently, Mr. Qiao called the sender of the package, Mr. Zeng, who said that the courier was a "gift box" sent by Mr. Qiao after he bought wine on Taobao.

Mr. Qiao then contacted the seller's customer service to inquire about the specific situation of the empty package. The customer service replied that the wine was shipped through Jingdong Express, but because the logistics information of Jingdong Express could not match the Tmall backstage, it was necessary to use the single number of Yuantong Express to make a library, so there was no situation where the courier said that the single brushing.

Mr. Qiao believes that he only purchased one product, but the merchant found two courier companies to deliver, and the delivery addresses of the two couriers are not the same, and he provided his personal information to a third party without his consent.

After fruitless communication with the merchant, Mr. Qiao reported to 12315, expecting the relevant departments to deal with the merchant according to law and compensate for the risk of his information being leaked.

Buying a bottle of wine but receiving two couriers, one of which is empty? This action by the seller may be a violation of privacy

12315 shows pending case filing

Shop:

The logistics of sending physical goods and Taobao have not cooperated

Empty packages are not a swipe, just to fill in the courier number

On February 28, the Red Star News reporter contacted the merchant concerned, who told the reporter that for the customer's purchase experience, they chose to use Jingdong Logistics for delivery, but because Taobao could not fill in the order number of Jingdong Logistics, the transaction page would always show that it had not been shipped, so they chose to use YTO Express to send an empty package to Mr. Qiao in order to upload the single number.

The merchant also stressed that this is not a swipe order.

Mr. Qiao said that the seller did not communicate with himself in advance that he would ship in this form, "If the seller tells me in advance that he will send my goods to two courier companies, I will immediately refuse to buy." Because of this kind of transaction, it is obvious that it violates my personal information. ”

Buying a bottle of wine but receiving two couriers, one of which is empty? This action by the seller may be a violation of privacy

Jingdong Logistics Express Order

Regarding this matter, Taobao staff said in a reply to reporters that Taobao merchants can choose Jingdong Logistics to ship, but when filling in the courier number, they need to choose "other logistics". Since Taobao and Jingdong Express do not cooperate, the courier bill number and logistics information will not be displayed, and abnormal orders may indeed occur, which requires sellers to communicate with buyers in advance.

The Taobao staff also said that it is not recommended that the merchant do this, and the store's practice has illegal operations: the merchant did not ship according to the express delivery agreed on the order (the transaction record shows that the YTO Express delivery), it was a promise that was not fulfilled, and complaints can be made on the Taobao page.

Buying a bottle of wine but receiving two couriers, one of which is empty? This action by the seller may be a violation of privacy

Express receipts for waste pieces of paper

lawyer:

The information is provided to the courier company without the consent of the customer

would constitute an invasion of privacy

Guo Gang, a lawyer at Sichuan Fangce Law Firm, believes that according to the provisions of Articles 1032, 1033 and 1165 of the Civil Code, natural persons enjoy the right to privacy, and no organization or individual may infringe on privacy by means of leakage or other means. At the same time, those who infringe on the right to privacy due to fault shall bear tort liability. In order to match the Tmall logistics review, the Taobao store provides its receipt information to the YTO company without the consent of the customer, which constitutes an infringement of the customer's privacy, and if the customer has losses, the Taobao store may be required to bear the tort liability.

Zhou Yan, a lawyer at Tahota Law Firm, believes that the store's behavior is indeed a breach of the privacy of the parties. Citizens' addresses are sensitive personal information, protected by the Personal Information Protection Law of the People's Republic of China, and the merchant discloses Mr. Qiao's address information to a third party, which is an act that infringes on his right to personal information protection. Mr. Qiao may report to the relevant departments, and the relevant departments have the right to require the merchant to order corrections, and if he refuses to make corrections, he shall be fined accordingly.

Red Star News reporter Du Yuquan Hu Hengrui

Edited by Yu Manga

(Download Red Star News, there are prizes for the newspaper!) )

Read on