In our daily saving process, "cost performance" is an important direction pursued by most players and friends, after all, saving money is the first priority of the saving circle, and it is also an important way to obtain satisfaction in the process of saving, that is, spending less money and choosing hardware with better parameters, which is a pursuit and a charm.
But everything is limited, and excessive pursuit of cost performance will often outweigh the losses. Especially in recent years, with the rise in the price of computer hardware, the emergence of various low-cost copycat miscellaneous brands has made many players who save machines cheap, save money, and choose many hardware products that seem cheap but have hidden quality risks.
Today, let's take a look at the so-called "cost-effective game console" to save the machine list, and analyze whether the machine list really achieves "cost performance".
Save the machine list
First of all, the overall part, from the traditional three major pieces, the motherboard, CPU and graphics card interface protocol, there is no "U does not match the board" or "high U low display" and other obvious hardware mismatch problems, that is, according to the configuration can be used normally.
Specific consideration, the three major pieces basically use the latest Intel 12th generation Core processor, with Z690 high-end motherboard, even if the graphics card, there is no 30 series graphics card, but in terms of the current full shortage of graphics cards, with 20 series graphics cards is also understandable; the key is that the storage, to know the 12th generation Core with Z690 motherboard, and even has supported the native PCIe5.0 SSD, even if there is no mass production GEN5 products, you should also choose PCIe4.0 SSD, or the previous generation of PCIe3.0 SSD, otherwise, wouldn't it be a complete waste of the storage bandwidth brought by the flagship board U?
What's more, in terms of price, the mainstream 1TB or so PCIe3.0 SSD has been priced at less than 800 yuan, less than 200 yuan difference, and why choose a weak performance SATA SSD? Does this really make it cost-effective?
If the choice of storage is only a lack of awareness of hard disk products, then the choice of other hardware brands exposes the author's perception of cost-effective errors.
Simply think that cheap is the first meaning, completely disregarding the differences in hardware brands.
Motherboard, the choice of non-four major board factories of on the Onda motherboard, can not say wrong, can only say that in the case of acceptable price, try to choose a big-name motherboard, whether it is product quality, or functional design, the advantages of the brand motherboard is still obvious;
In terms of memory, it is more exaggerated, choosing the whale memory that almost no one has heard of, memory as an important data storage device, quality is life, and the drawbacks of the cottage brand are that the particles are unknown, the manufacturing process cannot be verified, the quality control level is difficult to convince, and the long-term use will inevitably affect the overall experience of the computer;
Graphics card and monitor, there is the same problem, are not well-known second-rate or even third-rate brands in the market, although the price, compared to first-line brands have advantages, but in the long run, such a "low price" product, do you really dare to use?
Cost-effective, expressed is that in the case of the same performance performance, the price can also have a certain advantage in the product; the premise is the performance of the product, and there are a large number of second- and third-rate brand products that cannot be verified in the machine list, from the statistical probability point of view, these brand products are difficult to ensure the stability of performance, although the price is indeed cheap, but the pursuit of the machine is not only cheap, but more importantly useful, you say?
Finally, if you have questions about your saving list, or do not know whether the price of the matched configuration order is appropriate, you can send your analog configuration list ID and @ author in the comment area, and we will help you as soon as possible.
(7864109)