Recently, Tesla officially sued Chen Zhengang (account name @ Xiaogang Xuechang) on a platform with tens of millions of fans on January 26, and the reason for the lawsuit was that the latter used the information network to carry out defamation.
The incident originated from April 29 to 30, 2021, when bloggers named "Xiao gang seniors" posted two videos on the Internet titled "Use your two cars to do an emergency brake test".
Cheese short review 丨
This matter caused a lot of controversy, as early as the early days of the car review big V test video, some people questioned whether it was fake, but the big V then announced the test video without stepping on the throttle version (test subjects: cardboard and dummy), and Tesla Model 3's AEB (automatic emergency braking system) still failed to brake successfully.
However, at present, most of the netizens' attention is "recharged" in the car review big V, because there is a Xiaopeng P7 in the video that also participated in the test, but the Xiaopeng P7 can successfully brake in the face of cardboard in AEB (Automatic Emergency Braking System), but the use of cardboard to test this function personally believes that it is not rigorous enough, and it is not very reasonable.
But the same cardboard and dummies, Xiaopeng P7 can brake, and Tesla can't? So netizens and other car review big V opened the "fire eye golden eye" directly called this is the evidence that the big V was recharged, and some netizens even began to storm this big V.
In response to this matter, I follow a principle: the whole picture is unknown, and no comment will be made. Online reversal cases are not uncommon, the wind of public opinion has changed more than Sun Wukong 72, and since Tesla has officially sued the big V, it is better to wait for the court's judgment. We have to look at the truth, not the endless rumors.
Finally, believe in the law!