Speculating on the so-called Chinese "espionage" problem, the British Home Secretary announced that he would introduce new regulations to deal with the "national threat"

Source: World Wide Web

In the past few days, the British have hyped up the so-called Chinese "espionage" issue, which has been severely refuted by the Chinese side. But some politicians in the UK, still wearing colored glasses, continue to hype up without evidence, and the British Home Secretary, Prati Patel, also took the opportunity to claim that new regulations would be introduced to deal with the "national threat".

Comprehensive British Sky News Network, "The Nation" reported on the 17th, Patel issued a statement in the House of Commons that the British government will introduce new regulations to provide the security department with "the tools needed to deal with various national threats." At the same time, Patel also involved the chinese lawyer surnamed Li being falsely accused of being a "Chinese spy."

Sky News reported that Patel claimed that "as our world-class intelligence agencies have adapted to respond to emerging threats, we can expect to see alerts in this area become more common." "We are taking further steps through the Election Act to protect the integrity of our democracy, address electoral fraud, and prevent foreign interference in elections." ”

Patel also ripped on the false accusation that a Chinese lawyer surnamed Li had been falsely accused of being a "Chinese spy," claiming that the lawyer's connection with British lawmakers was aimed at making the political situation in Britain "more favorable to China."

After Patel's hype, British Labour MP Yvette Cooper intensified, claiming that labour "condemns China's attempts to interfere in the British democratic process with great intensity".

Britain's intelligence agency MI5 recently issued a warning to the country's parliament, claiming that the country's Chinese lawyer surnamed Li "engaged in political interference activities" in britain on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party. A number of British lawmakers immediately followed the trend and hyped up the "China threat".

In this regard, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin responded on the 14th: China has always pursued the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries. We do not and will not engage in so-called "interventions". Individuals may have watched too many 007 movies and produced too many unnecessary associations. It is very irresponsible to make alarmist remarks based on the subjective imagination of individuals. We hope that relevant British officials will not make remarks that have no factual basis, and still less should they use the hype of the "China threat theory" to achieve ulterior political goals.

Leung Chun-ying, vice chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference and former chief executive of Hong Kong, also posted on social media Facebook on the 14th that MI5 is obviously smearing. He believes that according to the logic of some people in britain, British "spies" are everywhere in Hong Kong.

It is worth noting that the allegations of the British intelligence agencies do not have any actual evidence, and the so-called "Chinese spies" of the British side are false, but the British spies are real. Recently, it was reported that the British side was exposed to install spies inside Huawei and checked Huawei over and over again.

Ma Kaiser, a former diplomat in Singapore, also recently said that a British corporate executive said that the British side installed intelligence personnel inside Huawei to conduct a "comprehensive inspection" to confirm that Huawei did not pose any threat. But a few months later, Britain "surrendered" under pressure from the United States. In this regard, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on the 17th that I have noted relevant reports and, like everyone else, I would like to hear what explanations the relevant British parties have made.