laitimes

To resist US aggression and aid Korea, why would the United States rather lose the war? Don't need dozens of atomic bombs that have already been prepared?

Introduction: Why would the United States rather lose the war to resist US aggression and aid Korea? Don't need dozens of atomic bombs that have already been prepared?

The atomic bomb is one of the weapons with the greatest lethality, the greatest power and the strongest destructive effect invented by mankind. In July 1945, the United States successfully tested the first atomic bomb in human history. At that time, at the end of World War II, the Japanese army had shrunk to the Japanese mainland, but still refused to surrender, so the Japanese emperor also ordered the "jade crushing" plan for the whole people.

To resist US aggression and aid Korea, why would the United States rather lose the war? Don't need dozens of atomic bombs that have already been prepared?

The Staff Headquarters of the U.S. Department of Defense, according to the Japanese army's strength, equipment level, and will to resist, assessed: to capture the Japanese mainland and end World War II, the US landing operation will have at least 1 million casualties. This can make the Top Americans miserable, and 1 million strong labor force is a huge loss for any country.

To resist US aggression and aid Korea, why would the United States rather lose the war? Don't need dozens of atomic bombs that have already been prepared?

Just when they were at a loss, someone proposed the use of the atomic bomb, and U.S. President Harry S. Truman agreed. In order to speed up the pace of the end of World War II and Japan's surrender, on August 6 and 9, 1945, the U.S. military dropped the newly built atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, where Japanese industry and arsenals were concentrated, respectively, and for a time Japan was seriously injured and destroyed its powerful supplies.

To resist US aggression and aid Korea, why would the United States rather lose the war? Don't need dozens of atomic bombs that have already been prepared?

Two atomic bombs killed 300,000 people, and one also destroyed a city. This was the first time that mankind had seen the power of the atomic bomb terror, and it was also the first and only time in human history that an atomic bomb had been used in actual combat. Not long after, the Japanese surrendered. Since the atomic bomb, the United States has become even more arrogant.

To resist US aggression and aid Korea, why would the United States rather lose the war? Don't need dozens of atomic bombs that have already been prepared?

In June 1950, North Korea wanted to unify the Korean Peninsula by force, attacked South Korea, and plundered the city and land all the way, occupying almost all of its territory. At that time, during the "Cold War," the United States and the Soviet Union did not fight on the surface, but secretly contested and competed for hegemony in all aspects.

To resist US aggression and aid Korea, why would the United States rather lose the war? Don't need dozens of atomic bombs that have already been prepared?

The United States did not want to see its support of South Korea battered, so it landed at Inchon in September and attacked North Korea. As soon as the US military came, the South Korean side reversed the war situation and fought the Korean People's Army to the border. At one point, the war spread to our borders, endangering the security of our homeland, and in order to defend our rights and interests, we decided to send troops to Korea.

To resist US aggression and aid Korea, why would the United States rather lose the war? Don't need dozens of atomic bombs that have already been prepared?

As soon as the volunteers entered the Korean battlefield, the Vietnam War became more and more courageous and overwhelming, and the US troops were beaten back to the south of the border, and they advanced all the way south, which was unstoppable. This upset MacArthur, the commander-in-chief of the U.S. Army in the Korean War at the time, who not only proposed to attack northeast China and bomb Dandong, but also proposed the use of atomic bombs on our homeland to repeat the old trick of Japan's defeat in the war.

To resist US aggression and aid Korea, why would the United States rather lose the war? Don't need dozens of atomic bombs that have already been prepared?

At that time, the PRESIDENT of the United States, seeing that the war was unfavorable, even if he could bear this breath, was also planning to transport dozens of ATOMIC BOMBs of the United States to the Guam Air Base at that time, and at any time he could drop atomic bombs on the Korean Peninsula and destroy the volunteer army and military facilities in the northeast. But the strange thing is that in the end, I didn't dare to use it, why is this? Would the U.S. military rather watch itself lose?

To resist US aggression and aid Korea, why would the United States rather lose the war? Don't need dozens of atomic bombs that have already been prepared?

At that time, US President Truman finally abandoned the plan to drop the atomic bomb because: first, at that time, the anti-war voice in the United States was very loud, the pressure on the US government was very large, and its use at this time would inevitably cause riots and affect political achievements; second, at that time, in the Cold War stage, once the United States dropped the atomic bomb, it was bound to challenge the Soviet Union, and the Soviet Union would also participate in the war. It should be known that the Soviet Atomic Bomb was not vegetarian, and there were more of them than in the United States.

To resist US aggression and aid Korea, why would the United States rather lose the war? Don't need dozens of atomic bombs that have already been prepared?

You know, it wasn't long after world war II. If two world superpowers go to war, it will be the next world war. The local war in Korea will also evolve into a new world war, and the war will be infinitely expanded, and the Western countries will fall into passivity. Under the strong persuasion of British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, the United States Truman also gave up the use of atomic bombs after considering various factors. You must know that the use of atomic bombs is a human disaster, and no one dares to use it easily.

Read on