The U.S. "Starlink Project" serves humanity is just a lie. In the future, once the "Starlink Project" is deployed, it may subvert the entire space defense pattern.
Earlier, the Us "StarLink" constellation had successfully stopped 401 nuclear bombs from imaginary enemies in two confrontation simulation tests. Since the "Starlink" system has 5-7 interception opportunities for each incoming warhead, its advent in the future will inevitably greatly weaken the missile and nuclear force penetration capabilities of the US enemy and become another anti-missile weapon of the US military.
Conventional ground-based early warning radars are overwhelmed by the proliferation of hypersonic weapons with variable trajectories. As a result, early warning satellites with advantages such as high viewing angle, wide field of view, and large coverage have become the life-saving straw of the US military's anti-missile system.
According to Musk's public data, the development and launch cost of a single "Starlink" satellite is continuing to decline, and it is even cheaper than the US military's anti-missile interceptor bomb. Coupled with the high-speed communication support of the "Starlink", the remote control and command of unmanned clusters, the collection of battlefield intelligence information and other high-value military utilities, the Pentagon is not moved. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand that the White House has helped the "Starlink" to cover up and make sophistry for its frequent "derailment".
SpaceX expects the first phase of Project Starlink to deploy 12,000 satellites into space. However, according to relevant documents, SpaceX is preparing to add another 30,000 satellites, eventually bringing the total number of satellites to about 42,000. At this stage, there are 1469 Starlink satellites in operation, and another 272 are in operational orbit.
From an international and national security perspective, once SpaceX "Starlink" is deployed, countries around the world will be subject to 24-hour uninterrupted optical monitoring. The battlefield situation will form a "one-way transparent" state for the US military, and the movement and number of any ground force will be clearly seen by the US military.
In the past, nuclear-armed countries could basically achieve military equivalent deterrence with the United States, but if the future "Starlink" satellites carry "space-based weapons" systems, they can destroy the opponent's communication satellites at critical moments. At that time, the intercontinental ballistic missiles of the "enemy" of the United States will become "headless flies" and it will be difficult to use them to suppress the US military.
In fact, in recent years, the frequent "orbiting" of "Starlink" satellites has caused security threats to Chinese spacecraft, which is enough to be regarded as a test of the Pentagon's practical utility of "Starlink". According to the statistics of the astronautical research team of the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom, at least 1600 "star chain" approaching spacecraft events will occur every week. According to this calculation, the above-mentioned accidental friction events may increase by about 10 times in the future, and the harm is self-evident.
In addition, some analysts believe that the US "Starlink Program" and the "Space Force" are closely related, and the X-37B is a key part of the "Star Wars" program, which will promote the improvement of the US "air-space-ground integration" combat capability and the deployment of the US "Endless Frontier" space strategy, which contains extremely high global military value.
So, how should countries deal with the threat of Starlink? Some people believe that behind the development of Starlink, the essence of the technical level is that SpaceX has mastered the feedback of technologies such as cheap launch vehicle launches and large-scale mass production of satellites. To break this deadly chain, it is not the star chain that needs to be paid attention to, but the reusable rocket, which is the offer to launch a payload of more than 15 tons at a price of $30 million or less. What do you think about that?