This is the head of the article
Some media recently broke the news that Musk, the American "Iron Man" who just completed the feat of acquiring Twitter not long ago, said that he had a way to let Russia launch nuclear weapons return to the original point after circling the earth, which immediately caused an uproar. Although the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian conflict is still the focus of international public opinion, Musk has directly led the topic to Russia's nuclear weapon guidance technology, which inevitably makes the outside world wonder whether Musk has established a cooperative relationship with the Pentagon in one area and carried out another level of military-civilian integration. The Pentagon, on the other hand, refuses to respond to questions from the outside world, but the COLD TREATMENT OF THE US MILITARY IS NOT ENOUGH TO COVER UP THE UPS OF PUBLIC OPINION.
As the two countries with the largest number of nuclear weapons in the world, the nuclear forces of the United States and Russia have been relatively balanced for a long time since the Cold War, and it is not only the treaty on nuclear weapons reduction that is in play, but also the INF treaty that restricts the development of missile technology between the United States and Russia. In the construction of the missile defense system, both the United States and Russia have established a cascade air defense system, and the United States has benefited from a large number of alliance systems, which can deploy air defense systems in the territory of allies in different regions, further enhancing its strategic defense capabilities. However, the battlefield of the 21st century has long since risen from the traditional "sea, land and air" to today's "sky grid", and Musk's SpaceX starlink plan has undoubtedly paved the way for the future "space hegemony" of the United States.
According to the content disclosed by the Starlink plan, the plan will eventually launch tens of thousands of artificial satellites into low-Earth orbit, ostensibly SpaceX claims to be to form the so-called "global WIFI", but in fact, a large number of low-cost artificial satellites are more "grabbing the ground" in the satellite orbit, and the resulting risks have not only caused Protests from China, but even the European allies of the United States have expressed dissatisfaction and criticism. However, Musk's statement directly targeted Russia's nuclear weapon guidance technology, which is obviously beyond the scope of its own business operations. As we all know, nuclear weapons, as the last resort of a military power, will inevitably abandon overly advanced technology in some fields in order to pursue stability.
For example, in the key guidance technology, although relying on artificial satellite positioning has been very mature, but once the satellite used to guide the direction is attacked, no matter how accurate the positioning will be in vain, so in terms of reliability is not as safe as inertial guidance and constellation guidance, and even if there is no hypersonic gliding technology of traditional ballistic missiles, the sub-warhead can still reach Mach 20 at the end of the decline, and the best flight route of Russia's strategic nuclear weapons is from crossing the Arctic to the United States.
As a result, there has been very little reaction time for the defenders, not to mention that Russia has publicly tested the latest heavy land-based ICBM Salmatt, equipped with hypersonic technology developed by Russia, which further shortens the reaction time of the defenders. As a world-renowned entrepreneur, Musk may indeed have unique achievements in some fields, but the weight of the country can not tolerate gimmicks and eye-catching, which can only damage the image of the United States in the high-tech field in the long run.
This is the end of the article