Recently, a letter between Lenovo and a blogger stirred up the Internet. The blogger posted an article on his platform about Huawei winning a tender for equipment from state agencies, only to receive an infringement notice from Lenovo. What's going on with this letter?
It all started with a seemingly ordinary blog post. The blogger published an article titled "Huawei Wins Bid for State Equipment," detailing Huawei's win in a major tender.
Huawei's victory means that they will provide the necessary technical equipment to state agencies. The publication of this article did not go as uneventful as expected.
Lenovo was quick to express their displeasure. They sent a legal letter to the blogger, sternly stating that the content in the article violated Lenovo's rights and demanding that the blogger immediately take down the article.
The letter not only claimed that the blogger's actions constituted serious infringements, but also warned that Lenovo would take further legal action if no corresponding action was taken.
This sudden notification left the blogger feeling very confused and helpless. He didn't know exactly what he had offended Lenovo or why Lenovo had reacted so violently to such a fact-telling article.
And explained to the public the ins and outs of the matter. Many netizens expressed their support for the blogger, believing that he only reported on the results of a public tender and did not infringe on the rights and interests of any company.
Others are beginning to question Lenovo's motives, wondering why a large company would respond so forcefully to a simple news story.
A number of legal experts and IP experts began to express their views on the case, analyzing the legal position and possible consequences in this case.
In this turmoil, the original intention and actions of the blogger were supported by many people. He said he didn't regret publishing the article despite the pressure because he believed his actions were justified and based on facts. He is also considering how to deal with Lenovo's legal threats and whether he needs to take legal action to protect his rights.