laitimes

Kangxi only imprisoned Aobai, but why did he hang Bambulshan, who was a member of the Ai Xinjue luo family?

The BambolShan of the "Kangxi Dynasty" can be described as "unforgiving", as a royal relative and uncle of the Kangxi Emperor, he has always harbored the heart of rebellion, first betrayed Suksaha on the verge of defection, so that Suksaha was killed by Aobai, and then repeatedly instigated Aobai to force the palace Kangxi, and finally even when Kangxi and Aobai were inseparable, he tried to come to a "mantis is not good, the yellow bird is behind", led troops into the palace, and usurped the throne. Eventually, Bambulshan, who conspired to go bankrupt, was also punished by Kangxi Ming.

In the relevant historical materials of the Qing Dynasty, there are not many records of Bambolshan.

"When Ao Bai entered the meeting, the guards arrested him with a punching scene. Since then, he has set up a camp of good throwing and led it with his close subjects. The king's ministers worshiped the thirty great sins and became a condemnation of the clan. The Kangxi Emperor decreed that he would be spared death and detention for his repeated military exploits, and his party, Bambul Shan, was reprimanded. ''

"Bambul Shan, progressively enfeoffed as a vassal duke. Worship with attachment, and condemn death."

However, judging from the fact that the Kangxi Emperor laid down twenty-one major sins for Bambulshan and then ordered his execution, Kangxi must have a deep hatred and extreme dislike for Bambulshan, which ultimately determined the outcome of Bambulshan's death.

Kangxi only imprisoned Aobai, but why did he hang Bambulshan, who was a member of the Ai Xinjue luo family?

The Kangxi Emperor imprisoned the dictatorial Aobai and instead executed him, but instead executed Bambulshan, who was attached to Aobai, for many reasons.

First of all, it is because the credit of Ao Bai is too great.

Ao Bai was born into a famous family, was the nephew of Fei Yingdong, one of Nurhaci's "Five Founding Ministers", he served the three Qing emperors of The Emperor Taiji, Shunzhi and Kangxi all his life, and made great achievements in many battles such as the capture of Pi Island, the Battle of Songjin, and the pursuit of Li Zicheng in the south, and was praised by Emperor Taiji as "the first Batulu". After the death of Emperor Taiji, Aobai always stood firmly on the side of Emperor Taiji's son Hauge and the Shunzhi Emperor, resolutely confronting Dorgon, and thus winning the high recognition of the Shunzhi Emperor, which gave him the status and status of an auxiliary chancellor.

Therefore, when Kangxi set thirty major crimes for Aobai and prepared to execute Aobai, Aobai revealed the scars on his body, and even the Kangxi Emperor was moved by it, and finally did not execute him and imprisoned him.

Kangxi only imprisoned Aobai, but why did he hang Bambulshan, who was a member of the Ai Xinjue luo family?

Secondly, as a royal nobleman, Instead of side with Kangxi, Bambulshan was in the company of Ao bai, which made Kangxi deeply resentful.

Bambulshan is the grandson of Nurhaci and the son of Tabai, the sixth son of Nurhaci, but tabai is really very different from the brothers such as Daishan, Huang Taiji, Mang gultai, Dolgun, and Dodo, whether in terms of fame, title and status. Despite his very bad background, Bumbleshan, through his own efforts and deeds, achieved the position of Minister of the Interior and a member of the Secretarial College.

However, as a member of the clan and an uncle of the Kangxi Emperor, Bambulshan, in the face of Aobai's dictatorship, not only did not support and assist Kangxi, but instead "aided and abetted abuse" and stood against the emperor, which made Kangxi very dissatisfied with him, and made people even more suspicious of his plot and ambition to usurp the throne. Such a Bambolshan, Kangxi would definitely not let him stay, and would inevitably get rid of it quickly.

Kangxi only imprisoned Aobai, but why did he hang Bambulshan, who was a member of the Ai Xinjue luo family?

Again, Ao Bai did not execute Kangxi, so someone had to die on Ao Bai's behalf.

The dictatorship of Ao Bai can be said to have aroused great dissatisfaction among the entire imperial court, from Kangxi and Empress Xiaozhuang to the civil and military officials who did not rely on Ao Bai and were persecuted by Ao Bai, who deeply resented Ao Bai and his cohorts.

Kangxi remembered that the merits of Ao Bai could be spared from Ao Bai, which could be supported and understood by hundreds of officials, and at the same time it was the place where the implementation of benevolent government and thus win the hearts and minds of the people, but if the Ao Bai party did not liquidate and punish, it would be difficult to calm the anger of the ministers of the DPRK, and at this time, Bambul Shan, who was attached to Ao Bai, became a person who had to die. On the one hand, Bambulshan was a member of the clan and ranked in the imperial cabinet, with a certain position, and his death could have a certain influence and, to a certain extent, calm the pressure of public opinion; on the other hand, the execution of members of the royal family could show Kangxi's determination and thunderous means to attack the Aobai party, and then establish his imperial majesty and imperial authority.

Kangxi only imprisoned Aobai, but why did he hang Bambulshan, who was a member of the Ai Xinjue luo family?

Finally, in view of the Manchu Qing regime's consistent policy of being very benevolent to meritorious servants, but unusually resolute toward those who love the Shin Kyora family.

In the process of Kangxi getting rid of Ao bai and liquidating Ao Bai's henchmen, Ao Bai was not executed by Kangxi, but was imprisoned by Kangxi, and another auxiliary minister who had been the head of Ao Bai Ma, Shu Bilong, was not too embarrassed by Kangxi, but simply dismissed him, and then reactivated a year later, and still received Kangxi's respect in his later years.

Throughout the early years of the Qing Dynasty, there were no incidents of slaughtering heroes like the Han and Ming emperors, and the heroes who seized the world for the Manchu Qing regime almost all ended well, and even if they made mistakes, they were treated more leniently.

Correspondingly, the rulers of the Manchu Qing regime were indeed very determined about the people who had made mistakes in loving the Xinjue luo family, counting them carefully, including Shulhaqi, Chu Ying, Amin, Mang Gultai, Azig, Shuo Chen, Adali, etc., although these people were also people who had made great achievements, they still did not escape the fate of being executed, let alone Bambulshan.

Therefore, the death of Bambolshan became a necessity and an inevitability.

Kangxi only imprisoned Aobai, but why did he hang Bambulshan, who was a member of the Ai Xinjue luo family?

Read on