Hello everyone, I am looking at the world strictly. Write fun articles and make friends all over the world.
According to the news of the Central Broadcasting Network on December 16, on December 14, someone broke a video of Song Gengyi, a female teacher at Shanghai Aurora Vocational College, in class, who made a series of inappropriate remarks about the Nanjing Massacre.
According to the video, she said in class that the number of people involved in the Nanjing Massacre may be exaggerated, why not count in detail based on id cards and names at that time? Why are all the victims not counted? It is also believed that we should not hate forever, but should reflect on how the war came about.
On the 15th, the official microblog of the "Memorial Hall of the Compatriots Killed in the Nanjing Massacre of the Japanese Army Invading China" released relevant historical records, saying that "the number of compatriots killed in the Nanjing Massacre is more than 300,000, and the evidence is overwhelming!" ”
On the same day, Shanghai Aurora Vocational College has launched an investigation procedure, and Song Gengyi has been expelled from the school.
On December 16, the People's Daily published an article commenting on the erroneous remarks of the teachers of Aurora College: More than 300,000 compatriots were killed in the Nanjing Massacre, and the evidence was overwhelming. Speculate in vain, question the truth of history, and be a teacher in vain! Forget the suffering, deny the evil deeds of other countries, and become a national! Education welcomes the pursuit of truth, but in the name of "distinguishing falsity", exonerating sinners and erasing national suffering, how can such ignorance and immorality be worthy of guiding the next generation? History is the foundation, and education is the future of the nation. If the future loses its foundation, where will the nation survive?
(i)
In fact, the People's Daily has already said it in great detail, and each of those words is not exaggerated on him.
I'm just curious, why do we go through so many years of ideological character and patriotic education, and as a result, there are still such people, and they can still be teachers?
December 13 this year is the eighth National Day of Commemoration for the Victims of the Nanjing Massacre in China, and this day is for us to publicly pay tribute to the innocent people of Nanjing who were unarmed but innocently killed.
It is not for you to engage in dialectical thinking, to uphold the spirit of doubt, to question this history that has been overwhelmingly proven.
The questions she raised in class were actually relevant historical records and witness testimony, but she herself did not know, or selectively ignored.
The figure of 300,000 in the Nanjing Massacre is not accurate to the individual, and one person is not bad (this is also impossible. Otherwise it wouldn't be called a massacre), but it was already the minimum number of deaths.
(ii)
First of all, according to the testimony of One of the main perpetrators of the Massacre, Gu Shoufu, it can be concluded that the number of victims is definitely above 300,000.
Secondly, in 1983, the Nanjing Municipal Party Committee and Municipal Government set up a special group for compiling the history, building a museum and erecting a monument to the Nanjing Massacre, visited 1,756 relevant people, and determined that the death toll was more than 300,000.
In particular, the Nanjing Municipal Archives has a report that was investigated by the then Nanjing government in February 1946, which found that 295517 people were slaughtered by the Japanese, accurate to single digits.
According to Lever Jing, these are all domestic evidence, there is embellishment and falsification, then there is also a post-war judgment of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, in English.
It states that within six weeks of the Japanese occupation of Nanjing, the total number of civilians and prisoners of war killed was about 200,000 (this number does not include bodies burned, thrown into the Yangtze River, or other secretly disposed of).
The most ridiculous point is that when there was an ID card, everyone can think that with the management level of the Kuomintang, how many people in the whole country are not clear, let alone issue ID cards.
(iii)
In this Internet era, we welcome everyone to investigate and verify various issues, especially historical doubts, and finally achieve the purpose of de-falsifying the truth and make the truth more convincing.
But this investigation is based on new evidence, or facts, not on the basis of your mouth: this is false, right? That's wrong, right?
If you think it is false or wrong, then you go and get the evidence, otherwise what do you want to do in archaeology and history?
Open your mouth and say that there is a problem, I can only say that the problem is not this matter, but yourself!
Do you have anything to say about the teachers of Shanghai Aurora College who were exposed to making inappropriate remarks about the Nanjing Massacre? Welcome to pay attention to the message.