01
In class, he said that "the data of the Nanjing Massacre has no historical support"
College teachers who made false statements have been dismissed
Recently, Song Gengyi, a teacher at Shanghai Aurora Vocational College, was exposed to a video of making inappropriate remarks in class about the Nanjing Massacre, which triggered strong indignation from everyone.
The video that broke the news showed that when the teacher mentioned the Nanjing Massacre, she also said:
"How many people did the Japanese army that invaded China massacre in Nanjing?" 300,000 people are not supported by data. ”
"Who is dead, who is famous and who has a surname, if there is no name, no surname, no identity card number, your 300,000 is just an overview of a Chinese historical novel writing."
"For this period of history, if there is no historical support, it is just folk talk, and it is the same as the truth."
"We should not hate forever, but reflect on how the war came about."
Some netizens said, "How can such a person become a teacher?" Some netizens said, "People who have really experienced it have not waited for an apology all their lives, and as a people's teacher, a transmitter of ideas and history and culture, they should not say such things." ”
On December 16, the People's Daily commented on the teacher's erroneous remarks in eight big characters, "For the people of the people, for the people!" In the accompanying picture of the article published by the state media, several large characters were written impressively, "The evidence is like a mountain, how can it be nonsense." Education can seek truth, but under the guise of "defending falsehoods", finding excuses for sinners and forgetting the suffering of the nation, how can it be worthy of being a teacher.
On December 15, the official microblog of Shanghai Aurora Vocational College issued a briefing, saying that on the morning of the 15th, after learning about the relevant situation, the school immediately set up a working group to investigate, and the school will deal with it seriously according to the rules and disciplines according to the results of the investigation.
On December 16, Shanghai Aurora Vocational College issued a briefing: After investigation and verification by our school, Song Gengyi, a teacher at the Oriental Film Academy, made erroneous remarks in the "News Interview" course on the afternoon of December 14, 2021, causing major teaching accidents and serious adverse social impacts, and was expelled according to the "Measures of Shanghai Aurora Vocational College on the Identification and Handling of Teaching Accidents" and the "Interim Regulations on the Punishment of Faculty and Staff of Shanghai Aurora Vocational College".
At present, the official website of Shanghai Aurora Vocational College can no longer find the teacher's information.
02
As victims, let us reflect on the causes of war?
Song Gengyi said: "If this history is not supported by historical materials, it may also be just folk talk, and it is the same as the truth." ”
"I don't think we should hate forever, but we should reflect on how war came about."
Reflecting on the causes of war is something that the aggressors who started it should reflect on, not our victims.
Whether or not to hate is the power of the witnesses, and you have no power to decide whether they should hate or not!
03
The evidence is overwhelming
The 300,000 victims should refer to the lower limit on the number of holocaust victims
@ Memorial Hall of compatriots killed in the Nanjing Massacre of the Japanese Army invading China On the 16th, a screenshot of the "Judgment of Gu Shoufu, One of the Main Perpetrators of the Nanjing Massacre", which showed: The total number of victims reached more than 300,000!
In 1946, 11 countries, including China, the Soviet Union, the United States, Britain, and France, established the International Military Tribunal for the Far East in Tokyo, Japan.
In the first six weeks after the Japanese occupation of Nanjing, the total number of civilians and prisoners slaughtered in and around Nanjing reached more than 200,000. This figure in the International Military Tribunal for the Far East does not include the bodies of those killed burned by the Japanese army, or thrown into rivers or otherwise disposed of.
On the stone wall of the Memorial Hall of the Compatriots Killed in the Nanjing Massacre of the Japanese Army Invading China, "300,000 Victims" are engraved in Chinese, British, Japanese and other languages, which shows the world the crimes of the Japanese invaders and also reminds the Chinese people of the humiliation and pain they have suffered.
In fact, the 300,000 victims should refer to the lower limit on the number of holocaust victims, most directly based on the judgments of military tribunals for the trial of war criminals after the war.
Another set of data comes from the Nanjing Military Tribunal in China in the same year.
In the trial of Japanese war criminals in the Nanjing Massacre, several important data were clearly verified:
There were 28 cases of collective massacres by the Japanese army, a total of 190,000 people, 858 cases of scattered massacres, a total of 150,000 people, the Japanese army carried out a massacre in Nanjing for 6 weeks, and more than 300,000 Chinese soldiers and civilians were shot and buried alive.
According to the "Judgment of The War Criminal Gu Shoufu" collected by the Second Historical Archive of China, the Gu Shoufu case records a total of:
There were 28 cases of collective massacres, 858 cases of scattered massacres, and 886 cases of innocent soldiers and civilians being brutally killed by the Japanese army. Among them, there were 378 cases in the Zhonghuamen area alone, accounting for 43% of the scattered massacres.
On March 10, the Nanjing court rendered a judgment in the Gu Shoufu case, which clearly stated:
"The worst period of the Cha Massacre was from December 12 to the 21st of the same month, that is, during the period when Gu Shoufu's troops were stationed in (southern) Beijing. Counting at the Zhonghua Gate Flower Temple, Pagoda Bridge, Shiguanyin, Xiaguancao Shoe Gorge, etc., I was captured by soldiers and civilians who were collectively shot by the Japanese army with machine guns and burned corpses, including 190,000 people, including Shan Yaoting. In addition, there were scattered massacres, and their bodies were buried by charitable institutions more than 150,000 people. The total number of victims reached more than 300,000. ”
The verdict in the case of Toshiaki Xiangjing and Takeshi Noda also mentions that more than 300,000 people were killed: more than 190,000 captured soldiers and civilians were collectively killed and destroyed, and more than 150,000 people were buried by scattered mutilations through charitable groups.
The Tokyo court's verdict on the Nanjing Massacre, although it did not directly identify the number of victims as 300,000, pointed out that "the Japanese army only did not count a large number of burned bodies in the river in the first six weeks after the occupation of Nanjing, that is, it slaughtered more than 200,000 civilians and prisoners."
How many "more than 200,000 people" are? The court did not make a definitive decision, but this open-ended conclusion at least suggests that the Tokyo court also found that 200,000 was only the lower limit, not the upper limit, of the number of victims. Most notably, this conclusion of "more than 200,000 people" has not yet been taken into account in the "mass dumping of rivers and burning corpses".
In summary, it is entirely possible to draw such a conclusion: for the number of victims of the Nanjing Massacre, the Nanjing court directly judged more than 300,000, and although the Tokyo court ruled that "more than 200,000 people", considering that "a large number of bodies burned by the river" were not counted, it can be said that the number of victims identified by the two courts is basically similar.
In addition, the 300,000 victims were only one of the crimes committed by the Japanese army in Nanjing, not the only crime. During the six-week atrocity, in addition to the slaughter of innocent soldiers and civilians, the crimes of plundering, rape, burning and destruction launched by the Japanese army inside and outside Nanjing were also part of the massacre.
The Tokyo court's verdict states that the Japanese army "committed about 20,000 rapes in the city of Nanjing in the month following the occupation ... This kind of arson continued for six weeks after a few days, as if according to a predetermined plan. As a result, about a third of the city was destroyed. ”
The Nanjing court also clearly ruled in its judgment: "During the operation, the defendants used murderous means to massacre prisoners and non-combatants, and committed atrocities such as rape, robbery, and destruction of property, which violated the provisions of the Hague Land Warfare Regulations and the Convention on the Treatment of Prisoners of War in Time of War, and should constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity." ”
The Tokyo court's verdict clearly stated that one-third of the houses in the city of Nanjing were burned down and almost all shops were looted. In the month after the Japanese army entered Nanjing, there were about 20,000 rapes and gang rapes, and even young girls under 10 years old and old women in their 60s and 70s were not spared. Many women were raped and then slaughtered and destroyed. This is a heinous crime committed by the Japanese imperialists against the Chinese people.
Therefore, for the identification and exposure of the crimes of the Nanjing Massacre of the Japanese Army, the "300,000 victims" is not only the bottom limit for the number of victims, but also the bottom limit for judging the atrocities committed by the aggressors and defending the historical dignity of the nation, which brooks no questioning or challenge in any form.
04
History cannot be tampered with, remember history, do not forget the national shame!
Li Zijian's oil painting "Nanjing Massacre" is now in the collection of the National Museum of China
History cannot be tampered with, let alone questioned.
As a Chinese, as a college teacher, he openly tries to deny history and question history in class, and this kind of person is really unworthy of teaching and educating people. Anyone who has received compulsory education knows that the Nanjing Massacre is so overwhelming that it cannot be tampered with.
Many netizens suggested that "she went to the Nanjing Martyrs' Compatriots Memorial Hall to see and then speak", I think it is very necessary, although her academic qualifications are wuhan university journalism master's degree, but not as good as a primary school student, it is recommended to re-participate in compulsory education as well!
The arrogance and prejudice of a weak woman