laitimes

Is it Cao Wei who usurped Han, or did he sacrifice Emperor Zen to let the world go? Is it really possible for Cao Pi to force Liu Xie to abdicate?

author:Zi Su famous books to read

In the last "Business Strategy of the Heroes of the Three Kingdoms", the theme was reading, and through a lot of reading, I quickly grasped valuable and rich information.

In this part, "Confused Wisdom in the Three Kingdoms", the theme is thinking.

The relationship between thinking and reading is that reading is the basis of thinking, thinking is to digest and absorb the information and knowledge we read; reading and thinking are mutually reinforcing, the richer the reading, the higher the edifice for thinking, the deeper the thinking, the connotation and extension of the reading content can be excavated and used in practice.

Thinking and reading promote each other, will hide a large amount of beneficial information in our brains, become our deep subconscious, will show our profound thoughts, and improve the efficiency of handling affairs in life, career, and study, making us appear more and more intelligent.

In this work, each piece will begin with a thinking theme.

Regarding thinking, I will stop here for the time being, and from today onwards, I will talk about "Confused Wisdom in the Three Kingdoms".

Is it Cao Wei who usurped Han, or did he sacrifice Emperor Zen to let the world go? Is it really possible for Cao Pi to force Liu Xie to abdicate?

If Cao Cao is the most influential figure in Chinese history during the Three Kingdoms period, then compared to his Zhang Lu, he is far inferior to Cao Cao politically, and zhang Lu is far greater than Cao Cao in terms of civilian influence.

Why?

Zhang Lu is the representative of the fourth generation of Taoism and the representative of the second generation of Taoism.

Why?

This is the answer I think about and summarize.

This column is one of the most important things to cover.

Confused, there are true and false, many characters in the Three Kingdoms have shown themselves, which ones are true? Which ones are fake?

True confusion is the beginning of the catastrophe, but what about false confusion?

False confusion and strategy are, in a certain sense, a pair of contradictions in dialectics.

Strategy points to aggressiveness, and confusion points to retreat.

Strategy is to seek development, and confusion is to ensure survival.

It can be said that they are the two poles of the Tao or the yin and yang of the Tao, the strategy is the yang, and the confusion is the yin.

Strategizing and confusion are also mutually transformative.

When a person survives in confusion, as long as he survives, then he has the basis for development, but the direction of development may not be like this.

In the same way, if the strategy reaches a certain level and is not successfully developed, then it will become a confusion for survival, sometimes, called abandonment, sacrificing profits to save life. This is the law we stand on today, because everything is not as it should be.

That's one of the purposes for which this book was written.

Whether it is a photo or a fake, the purpose is to serve our lives, careers and studies, which is the practical application of reading and thinking.

Today is the first lecture, The Han XianDi confused the world.

In this book, the most important character is Zhang Lu, why talk about Emperor Xian of Han first?

One is that good drama is behind, and the other, according to the historical context, is conducive to our grasp of the history of the Three Kingdoms.

Back to the point.

Is it Cao Wei who usurped Han, or did he sacrifice Emperor Zen to let the world go? Is it really possible for Cao Pi to force Liu Xie to abdicate?

Judging from the Romance of the Three Kingdoms and the Book of later Han, The Han Emperor Liu Xiechan was forced to take the throne. In the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", it is very obvious that there are details of the group of courtiers who are forced to force each other, and there are also the details of Cao Jie's resistance.

There is no positive description of Liu Xie's forced Zen position in the Book of later Han, and it is written in the Book of Later Han that "the emperor abdicated, and King Pi of Wei was called the Son of Heaven." Emperor Feng was the Duke of Shanyang, with 10,000 households, seated on the princes, not to be called a vassal, not to be commanded to worship, to serve the heavens and the earth in the suburbs of Tianzi, and the Zongmiao Temple, Zu, and La were like the Han system, and the Turbid Deer City of Shanyang was all. ”

"Abdication", "Shi Ji Tai Shi Gong Self-Prologue" has "Tang Yao abdicated, Yu Shun did not take the throne." This "abdication" is an active abdication.

The latter is the treatment given to Liu Xie, or the etiquette of the Son of Heaven.

But in the Book of the Later Han Dynasty, Empress Xianmu Cao says, "Heaven forbid! "Just scold Cao Pi for not dying well."

From ancient times to the present, it is believed that Cao Wei usurped Han.

This makes sense.

First, the Cao Group is too powerful, and second, no one is willing to take the initiative to give up Jiangshan.

Is this conclusion really correct?

First of all, Cao Pi did not put Liu Xie under house arrest and asked him to go to the Principality of Shanyang to be the Duke of Shanyang, in Jiaozuo, Henan. At that time, the political atmosphere throughout the country was still the Han Dynasty, not the Wei Dynasty. The whole country knows about the King of Wei, not the Emperor of Wei.

Second, did a large part of the princes outside the control of the main force of the Cao clique surrender to the Han and not to Cao? At that time, the role of the idea of loyalty to the king could not be underestimated, right?

Third, did the princes outside the main control of the Cao clique not obey the rule of the Cao clan? Just before Liu Xie's abdication, there was an incident in which "Geng Ji of the Shaofu Province, Zhi Wei of the Xiang Dynasty raised his troops to curse Cao Cao". This is a jump, and what is not jumped out?

Fourth, did the swing princes outside the control of the main force of the Cao clique exist? Is this rocking phenomenon always present?

Finally, is there really no anti-Cao within the Cao Group? In the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", didn't Fu Baolang stand up and support the Han Room? And also Empress Cao Jie, protecting the Han Room? Cao Jie (196–260), emperor of Wei,cao pi (187 – 29 June 226), was Cao Pi's younger sister and was supposed to be a concubine of cao. This is the one who dares to jump, and there are those who dare not jump, what about the people who have the city government? Moreover, many of the civilian and military generals who defected to the Cao clan came for the purpose of supporting the Han Dynasty with Cao Cao, rather than against Cao Cao and the King of Wei. This force is a living force.

With these powers, if Liu Xie, the Emperor of Han Xian, raised the banner of the Han Dynasty in the Principality of Shanyang, could he immediately form a clique? Although it may not be possible to fight against the Cao Group, there is still hope. At least, Liu Bei, who pretended to revive the Han Dynasty, had to express it, right? Emperor Xian of Han was his nephew, and he still had a robe at the beginning.

Wasn't Emperor Liu Xie of Han confused? Just gave up? At that time, Liu Xie was only thirty or forty years old, which was the age of great achievements, how could he give way in such a confused way?

This means that even if Liu Xie abdicates, he can have the opportunity to make a comeback and rewrite the history of the Han Dynasty.

Let's talk about the reason why Liu Xie can not abdicate.

First of all, Cao Cao never had the slogan of emperor, no matter what he meant, at least he did not do so. He does not claim the title of emperor, and the possibility of having his son become emperor is very small.

Second, Cao Pi himself. His political, military, and literary talents were no different from Cao Cao's, and of course, his military was slightly worse. Did he have a loyal mind? Is he afraid of backlash?

Third, Liu Xie was Cao Pi's brother-in-law, and if Cao Pi wanted to kill Liu Xie, was this possible? The husband of the three sisters, not just Cao Jie alone, killed him a three sisters, did he dare? He's not a heartless and unrighteous man, right? He's a man of letters, right?

Fourth, Liu Xie himself knew that who dared to kill him? No one dared, even if it was suicide, I was afraid that Cao Pi would find it difficult for him to wash himself clean.

Fifth, what is the relationship between Liu Xie and Cao Pi? Liu Xie (April 2, 181 – April 21, 234) was six years older than Cao Pi, and was often together, coupled with their kinship, and it was difficult for any of them to kill anyone, right?

Sixth, Cao Cao seized power, but there was no plan to seize Jiangshan, he did not give up power, did not hand over power, the purpose is to protect himself. Why self-protection? It was because of the existence of his own hostile forces that he had to do so.

From these points of view, cao pi forced Liu Xie to give way, is it possible?

"Romance of the Three Kingdoms" played the group of courtiers dancing swords in front of Liu Xie, saying disrespectful words, it was impossible, committing fraud, who dared at that time?

But in fact, Liu Xie abdicated.

Couldn't Liu Xie see the above situation clearly? Is he too confused?

Liu Xie could occupy the throne without exercising imperial power, and after Liu Xie left Xuchang, he could revive the Han Dynasty in that place in Shanyang, but he did nothing?

Is he incompetent, or confused.

The Book of later Han records that Liu Xie was not completely unable to exercise imperial power, at least the right to education. He has run school education and encouraged talent development, and it has been very effective.

In many ways, Liu Xie's ingenuity and ingenuity have been shown, and I am afraid that the more intelligent he is, the greater Cao's supervision of him, the narrower the scope of his exercise of power. Therefore, his military and political talents cannot be expressed.

Therefore, Liu Xie is not an incompetent person.

Is that his confusion? Why did he give up jiangshan like this?

Please listen to the second lecture, abandon the emperor to practice medicine

Is it Cao Wei who usurped Han, or did he sacrifice Emperor Zen to let the world go? Is it really possible for Cao Pi to force Liu Xie to abdicate?

Related Reading:

Is Zhang Zhao's claim wrong?

Sun Quan's shouye foundation is five counties, and Yuan Shang's shouye foundation is four states, first look at how Yuan Shang keeps his profession

Sun Zhongmou bent down to endure humiliation and defended the family business, and "Zhenfu Shanyue" competed for the world

Zhang Zhao helped Sun Quan to a warhorse, and Zhuge Liang helped Liu Chan to a hotbed

Read on