laitimes

How fierce was the real Battle of Stalingrad? Don't be brainwashed by Western movies

author:Movie Rite Meow

In many movies about the Soviet Union's World War II in the West, Stalingrad will be described as a Soviet army relying on piles of people to win victory, and even made a clown movie like "Soldiers In the City", all kinds of shameless smears on the fallen giants, the Heart of the West in order to smear the Soviet Union, can be seen, but the real Battle of Stalingrad, is really like they filmed, blindly relying on piles of people?

How fierce was the real Battle of Stalingrad? Don't be brainwashed by Western movies

The answer must be wrong, you know, as a turning point in World War II, this battle, both sides invested a lot of troops, the German side, invested nearly 2 million troops, and the Soviet side also invested 3 million people, although, from the casualty ratio, the German casualties of 1.5 million, and the Soviet side of the casualties of 2 million, but, the Soviet union is strong, the German army directly damaged its own strength.

How fierce was the real Battle of Stalingrad? Don't be brainwashed by Western movies

Perhaps because of the brainwashing of Western film works, like "Saving Private Ryan", many people think that the Normandy landing was the turning point of World War II, in fact, it is not the same thing, the real situation is that the German army at that time transferred the main force to the Soviet-German battlefield, that is, the Eastern Front, which enabled the Allies to successfully complete the so-called Normandy landing, to put it bluntly, the Normandy landing was a monkey stealing peach, if the German army transferred the main force of the Eastern Front to the Western Front battlefield.

How fierce was the real Battle of Stalingrad? Don't be brainwashed by Western movies

It is estimated that enough for the U.S. army to drink a pot, and this also reflects how fierce the battle on the Eastern Front is, on the one hand is the elite german troops, and on the other side is the Soviet army's strength and quality of soldiers far behind them, which also leads to the Soviet casualties are obviously greater than them, the fierceness of the battlefield beyond our imagination, it is said that a newly joined soldier can survive two days, then this recruit can be promoted to squad leader.

How fierce was the real Battle of Stalingrad? Don't be brainwashed by Western movies

Even an officer's survival time in Stalingrad is less than three days, in a position, the speed of german advance is calculated in meters, often the German army occupies a kitchen, the Soviet army is in the living room, the tug-of-war between the two sides is a house and a house, which makes the casualties on both sides are very large, of course, in a clown movie like "Soldiers In the City", the situation that the Soviet army relies on the head pile is not realistic.

How fierce was the real Battle of Stalingrad? Don't be brainwashed by Western movies

The real Stalingrad absolutely can not be like the film in the film, the West smeared the Soviet film, you don't have to be too entangled in such a thing, in fact, according to the information we found, the Soviet Union at that time almost threw all its strength into this war, at that time, the entire Stalingrad ammunition consumption reached 9568 car skin, what concept, almost a car of bullets reached tens of thousands of rounds, it can be seen how exaggerated.

Read on