Since the implementation of the "double reduction" policy, it can be said that the social impact and response have been great. There are many people who hate not being able to support them with both hands and feet, there are many sharp criticisms, and many people hold a wait-and-see attitude. Realistically speaking, the support is not necessarily all parents, and the opposition is not all training institutions. However, regardless of the social response, this is an objective fact that already exists. So in the context of the "double reduction" policy, how will different families be affected, and what do parents need to do to cope with the changes brought about by the "double reduction"?
First, let's talk about the impact of the "double reduction" policy on various families.
For families with relatively superior economic conditions, if the child's academic performance and habits are good, the "double subtraction" policy has no impact, because they either do not need to make up classes at all, even if there is a problem in some subjects and chapters in a short period of time, they can also solve the problem through short-term "one-on-one". Of course, for those rich families whose children's learning habits are not very good and need to be "one-on-one" for a long time, the "double reduction" policy also has little impact. Here, don't say that the relevant departments prohibit "one-to-one", this cannot be prohibited, and the unrealistic prohibition will only cause "one-to-one" to become more and more expensive. Looking at this problem from another perspective, for students with superior family backgrounds, the people behind them either can't narrow the gap with me through make-up classes, or can't make up for classes, and the double subtraction not only has no impact on me, but even makes my advantages more obvious.
For families with poor economic conditions, if the child's academic performance and habits are very good or very poor, the "double subtraction" policy does not have an impact, the former does not need to make up lessons, the latter does not have the conditions to make up lessons, so whether they can make up classes outside the classroom in the future has no impact on them. Realistically speaking, many parents in this kind of family are happy for the "double reduction" policy, in their view, everyone can not make up the class, my child as long as the hard work can be successful, the cold door can be a noble son, they seem to be the biggest beneficiary of the "double reduction" policy, either the advantage has increased, or the disadvantage has decreased.
For families with medium economic conditions, but children's academic performance and habits are average, the impact of the "double reduction" policy is undoubtedly the largest, at least in a short period of time. Most parents in middle-class families are busy at work and don't have much time to take care of their children's studies, so if their children's learning habits are better, thank goodness. If the child's learning habits are not good, and parents are not willing to give up treatment, they can only rely on make-up classes to improve their grades.
Especially in the primary and junior high school stages, the difficulty of knowledge points is small, children spend more time, make up for the grades may go up, play for a period of time, the score will fall. The family's financial strength to support a class may be OK, and long-term "one-on-one" may not be able to eat. In a short period of time, such families may be really overwhelmed, they will complain that the little educational advantage they originally had has also been lost, and they have no ability to make their children pk rich children, it seems that it is difficult to get a noble son in the cold door.
Secondly, how do parents need to deal with the "double subtraction" environment?
Whether for or against, the "double subtraction" policy is an objective existence, and will not be essentially changed by gorgeous praise and harsh criticism. But the "double reduction" policy will not only affect educational institutions, but will bring profound changes to all families. Parents can only do their own work in this general direction, people with a little common sense will understand a truth, that is, the material is not extinguished, the energy is conserved, where is the reduction here, the reduction there, and finally the good things that can be increased?
After the "double reduction", the burden on parents will not be reduced, at least the burden on the spiritual level will be greatly increased. It seems that it can save the supplementary tuition fees of several cultural classes, but the investment in other aspects may increase, and it is not difficult to find that under the influence of the "double reduction" policy, a considerable number of education and training institutions have now closed down, and most of the still in operation are still surviving, and various so-called art institutions have sprung up, new "leeks" will soon appear, calligraphy, dance, musical instruments, programming and other courses came into being.
At present, most of the institutional business of this art type is still good, do parents continue to follow the trend? If you follow the trend, the end of the "double reduction" is to force parents to put the money of the cultural class make-up class into the so-called art training, after all, now the middle school entrance examination also has to test art, if there is time and money, which parent does not want their children to have more "art cells"? If you don't follow the trend, how do you plan to spend the extra time for your children? Self-study at home? Or do you hold the mobile phone king pesticide every day? This is a problem that every parent must face, after all, most parents are very busy at work, and it is impossible to accompany their children on weekends and holidays, staring at them to continue learning.
There is no doubt that after the "double subtraction", the majority of parents, especially primary school parents, must pay attention to the cultivation of children's learning habits, from an early age to cultivate children's good learning habits, to let children fall in love with learning, learn to learn, although it is difficult to do this, but can no longer be like the past cramming learning mode to cultivate children, will only make children hate learning. Parents can not expect all problems to be solved by the school, as parents, is the most important teacher of their children.
To sum up, the majority of parents and friends for the "double reduction" policy must attract enough attention, do not think that the purpose of "double reduction" is to make up for most children can not make up lessons, although this is a fact, but this is only the first step of the "double reduction" brought about by the impact, since the environment has changed, every family in it can only do their own work, with a positive attitude to adapt to change. For the ongoing "double subtraction", what unique insights do the friends in front of the screen have? Welcome to leave a message to discuss with Teacher Yang!
Thank you for reading, welcome to like and pay attention to Teacher Yang, thank you!