Who is it that stipulates that the mother-in-law should serve her daughter-in-law's confinement?
We all know that a woman needs the absolute companionship and care of her family a month after giving birth, and the general traditional idea is that the mother-in-law takes care of the daughter-in-law's confinement.
There's no rule about this, it seems like that's what it has been handed down.
But modern people can think about it, looking for a confinement wife, going to the confinement center, asking for a nanny, inviting a nursery, etc.,
Anyway, it is to use money to buy comfort, mainly to be comfortable, conducive to the growth of children, conducive to their own physical recovery, and no longer stick to who must take care of them.
But recently, a blogger posted that because of the confinement incident, he had a bitter stomach.
I also have my own family, and it's also a mess, and I can't get out of the way, so I didn't take care of my daughter-in-law's confinement.
As a result, not only does the daughter-in-law have a big opinion of herself, but the son who has been raised with hard work is also ignoring herself.
This made the blogger very sad and couldn't understand, just because of the month, is the son and daughter-in-law like this?
So netizens are also talking about it, let's see what everyone has to say:
Do you love your son? If you love, why don't you take a hand?
Giving birth is the most difficult time for a woman, how can you bear it!
This is to make excuses for yourself, to make excuses.
The confinement is only a month, why not put down other things and take care of it?
Is this difficult to understand? They're just angry with you in their hearts.
First of all, you don't treat people as family, and people will naturally ignore you.
As an old man, I don't recognize which thing is more important.
This is what seed is sown and what fruit is reaped.
As a mother-in-law, why can't you figure out such a thing?
It seems that netizens have quite an opinion on the blogger's approach, no matter how the previous mother-in-law and daughter-in-law got along, the month when the daughter-in-law gave birth to a child, the emotional and physical weakest time, the mother-in-law, as an elder, is to show the attitude she should have.
Even if there is really something, I can't get out, make it clear to my son and daughter-in-law, and give a replacement solution, instead of insisting that there is something, and then there is no then, just leave,
Doesn't that create conflict in the family?
There are also netizens who comfort the blogger, thinking that this matter is fair, no one pays attention to anyone, and no one has to contribute to anyone, this is the "two clears", so if you don't pay, don't keep emphasizing returns.
Isn't it normal that the relationship is mutual, and you don't give?
Ignore it, don't care, there's nothing to be angry about.
You're not obligated to help her, and she's not obligated to ignore you, it's fair.
Some netizens even shared, it's not that the mother-in-law is too peaceful at home, and when you meet an ungrateful child, what do you do, people are still not satisfied.
Don't be awkward, it's not a matter of taking care of children, I pay for everything, and finally start ignoring me.
No one requires a daughter-in-law to be confined, she must be served by her mother-in-law, and no one has no regulations. The daughter-in-law should take care of her mother-in-law, serve her mother-in-law, and support her mother-in-law...... All feelings are mutual, and they are reciprocated.
A family needs everyone to dedicate and maintain, there is no should or should not, everything depends on people's hearts, and feelings cannot be stipulated.
What do you think about this?