Before interpreting this matter, the author must first express his attitude:
This time, the support of the Jiyue Automobile brand, its employees did too badly, and empathy will also fire them.
Review:
A few days ago, an online blogger with the ID "Da Yao Tok" said on the public platform that he was fired from the company for buying a Xiaomi SU7 car, and his company was Jiyue Automobile.
As soon as the incident came out, Jiyue Automobile became the target of public criticism, and many car enthusiasts thought that Jiyue Automobile had no pattern, but in the author's opinion, this person was obviously suspected of hype; Therefore, this matter will not be very simple, the general car company will only restrict employees from driving other vehicles into the company's parking lot, and will not prohibit employees from buying other vehicles; after all, the product line of each car brand has limitations, and not all employees need this vehicle.
Let's take a look at a set of pictures.
Through this set of pictures, you can roughly feel the attitude of this person who wants to hype, so why did Jiyue Auto fire him?
The legal department of Jiyue brand gave a clear response, which was to the effect that:
Jiyue Automobile did not fire Yao Moumou for purchasing Xiaomi SU7, the company not only does not prohibit employees from buying other brands of vehicles, but also provides charging convenience for employees, including other brands of vehicles. The main reason for the dismissal of the employee was that during the period when Yao Moumou was in charge of social media and private domain operations in the user development department, he continued to operate and publicize the rider group for a certain rice brand on multiple platforms on the whole network in his personal name, and his actions had a direct conflict with his job responsibilities.
The key point is that the time node of Yao's publicity for a certain meter brand vehicle shows that his publicity and issuance behavior occurred many times during working hours, and at the same time, he had many records of absenteeism without reason, and the most serious one was to go to the pick-up ceremony of a certain meter car on April 3.
Seeing this, it will be clear, empathy, don't you fire him?
A certain rice refers to Xiaomi Automobile, Da Yao Tok made publicity for Xiaomi Auto and the brand during his tenure at Jiyue Automobile, even if it is a free practice that violates business and professional ethics, this behavior is generally said to be holding other people's bowls, smashing other people's pots, and helping the owner's competitors shout. If this practice only happens in the time cycle after work, the point is that part of the behavior of promoting Xiaomi Auto occurred during the working time of his social media and private domain operation positions in the user development department of Jiyue Automobile, which is a typical work for the Xiaomi brand with Jiyue's money, this practice is no longer a simple violation of business ethics, and its private morality is also debatable.
And it's hard to say whether some behaviors are suspected of violating the law, now it's worth studying his work history, some netizens exposed a picture that may be the employee's resume, interested car enthusiasts can take a look.
Summary:
Da Yao Tok's approach is obviously to use the popularity of Xiaomi cars to catch this torrential traffic, but no matter what, other car companies should not do such things during their tenure, this practice is commonly known as "eating inside and outside";
If such an employee is not fired, will he be kept for the New Year?
Tianhe Auto editor, welcome to retweet the comments