What exactly is the third model for the reunification of Taiwan? Will the external forces that the DPP authorities think they will "support" will really "reach out"? Macron gave the answer, and what important consensus has China and France reached?
Recently, Qiu Yi, a well-known commentator on current affairs in the Taiwan region, said that in the reunification of the motherland, in addition to the two modes of "peaceful reunification" and "military reunification," there is also a third mode, that is, "intellectual reunification." He pointed out that among these three models, "peaceful reunification" should be the best policy, but the actual environment has made "peaceful reunification" face many difficulties, which are mainly manifested in three aspects: First, the "Taiwan independence" forces on the island have distorted "peaceful reunification" into "peaceful 'Taiwan independence,'" and to put it simply, the "Taiwan independence" forces on the island are deliberately deforming the mainland's goodwill toward peaceful reunification into "substantive 'Taiwan independence'"; second, the intervention from external forces, especially the United States, has long regarded the mainland as its "strategic enemy," and the "Taiwan card" is its purpose to contain the mainlandThird, because the two sides of the strait have been separated for many years, there are indeed differences in certain ideas, and this has also caused some estrangement to the people on both sides of the strait to a certain extent. Second, although "armed reunification" is a once and for all plan, due to the intervention of the United States and external forces, and the fact that the blood of the compatriots on both sides of the strait is thicker than water, it is obvious that the mainland side is not necessarily willing to choose "armed reunification." The so-called "intelligent unification" refers to the plan for promoting reunification between "peaceful reunification" and "military reunification," which can be summarized as "intelligent unification." In Qiu Yi's view, the model of "forcing peace by force and promoting reunification by war" is also a kind of "intelligent unification", for example, the "encirclement and reinforcement" model of confiscating maritime jurisdiction can also be regarded as a kind of "intelligent unification".
It is undeniable that the reason why the above-mentioned multiple patterns have emerged on the issue of the reunification of the motherland and have not been resolved for a long time is mainly due to the fact that the DPP authorities and the "Taiwan independence" forces on the island have become more and more arrogant and have no bottom line in their behavior of relying on foreign countries to gain self-respect and seek "independence" by force, and they have recklessly acted recklessly relying on the "backing" of the United States and external forces behind their backs, but the real situation is that once the tension in the Taiwan Strait gets out of control, will the external forces on which the DPP authorities rely really "reach out" to them? There is a high probability that it will not, don't look at the current United States and Japan and other countries are cheering, Japan even threatens the so-called "Taiwan has something, that is, Japan has something", but the Kishida Fumio government still has to look at the Biden administration's face to act, not to mention the United States, during the recent phone call between Chinese and US leaders, US President Biden once again reaffirmed the "four noes and one no" commitment to China, that is, the United States does not seek to engage in a "new Cold War", does not seek to change China's system, does not seek to oppose China through strengthening alliances, does not support "Taiwan independence", and has no intention of clashing with China. At the same time, Biden stressed that the United States pursues a one-China policy. In addition, other external forces have also danced with the United States for a while, and in fact, these countries know better than anyone else that they cannot meddle in the Taiwan issue. For example, French President Emmanuel Macron has previously clearly stressed that Europe should avoid being drawn into a Sino-US conflict over the Taiwan issue.
In addition to making it clear that he does not want to offend China on the Taiwan issue, Macron also sent people to China for face-to-face talks, and China and France reached a number of important consensuses. This is the second visit by a French foreign minister to China in less than six months after former French Foreign Minister Colonna in November last year, and it is also the first visit to China by Céjourne after taking office as French foreign minister.
During the talks, the French side first clearly reaffirmed its adherence to the one-China policy, which the Chinese side appreciated. At the same time, the two sides stressed that they will strengthen the synergy between development strategies and industries, and actively explore new growth points for cooperation such as green development and artificial intelligence while deepening cooperation in traditional fields such as aerospace, nuclear energy, agriculture and finance. In addition, the two sides agreed to hold the 60th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations and the Year of Culture and Tourism, deepen cooperation in science and education, sports and cultural heritage protection, and provide more convenience for people-to-people exchanges between the two countries. He also advocated deepening the China-EU comprehensive strategic partnership, strengthening openness and cooperation, opposing "decoupling and breaking chains", properly handling differences through consultations, and jointly maintaining the stability of global production and supply chains and promoting global economic recovery.