In adult life and work, most people don't need complex problem-solving thinking in mathematics, physics and chemistry, but what really intuitively reflects the gap is the ability to express language, writing, and judge affairs.
In terms of learning, the scientific thinking that reflects the gap is not as good as the language ability that seems to be not large, and the science is more difficult from the perspective of learning difficulty, but from the dependence on talent, it is not much different.
Science can improve academic performance by mastering skills, especially in primary and junior high schools, more parents are more willing to take the lead in mathematics and English, which can obtain more obvious results, but also make them more affected by external forces, and even if the training is not very effective, it is more true to reflect the talent of students.
The most intuitive embodiment of the difficulty of Chinese is that the content of in-class learning is not examined, there is no point in brushing questions, and extracurricular training is more difficult to achieve.
The formation of literary literacy stems more from the innate sense of language and the language environment in the process of growth, so the most dominant subject for children from Kochi families is often Chinese, while mathematics, physics and chemistry masters do not have obvious aggregation. ，
The requirements of Chinese for the ability to transfer knowledge make the in-class learning of Chinese subjects equally important, that is, through the study of typical texts in the classroom, the improvement of literary literacy can be obtained, and the ability to have reading comprehension and analysis of problems can be achieved after the scene changes.
What English teaches and what to test, the effect of self-learning and extracurricular training is also obvious, it is a directly positive subject of input and output, the competition is learning attitude, mathematics is what to teach but not directly tested, but the content of the test and the content of teaching, has a strong cohesion, as long as there is no overclass, the training of brushing questions is also effective, but the efficiency of students with different thinking abilities is very different, but brushing questions still has advantages, but Chinese is brushing questions has no obvious effect, and it is also a competition between top students.