laitimes

The Kuomintang Iron Rooster used Han Kuo-yu as a tool, asking for help but no attitude!

author:Metax Community

Title: Political Changes: The Challenges and Introspection of the Kuomintang

The Kuomintang Iron Rooster used Han Kuo-yu as a tool, asking for help but no attitude!

Body:

The Kuomintang Iron Rooster used Han Kuo-yu as a tool, asking for help but no attitude!

In Taiwan's political arena, turbulent changes always affect everyone's heart. Recently, the KMT's move has once again become the focus of attention inside and outside the island. Some praise, some question, and some criticize outright. Today, we will delve into the challenges and reflections that this ancient party faces in modern society.

The Kuomintang Iron Rooster used Han Kuo-yu as a tool, asking for help but no attitude!

It has to be mentioned that Han Kuo-yu, a once high-profile political figure, has frequently appeared in various public occasions in the past period. He shuttled all over Taiwan, from south to north, and devoted himself to one activity after another. According to statistics, he has participated in more than 50 public events, and in most cases it has been prepared by supporters such as live streamers out of their own pockets.

The Kuomintang Iron Rooster used Han Kuo-yu as a tool, asking for help but no attitude!

However, there are some problems behind this. The KMT does not seem to have given enough support and subsidies to ensure that the event ran smoothly. Such an approach begs the question: why could a political party with a long history and a large organizational structure appear so passive at such a critical moment.

In this regard, we cannot but recall the similar treatment that Wang Jinping and senior politicians have suffered in the past. The things of the past may be gone, but the re-emergence of the same problems today does not lead us to re-examine the values of respect and solidarity?

We have seen the indomitable and hard-working spirit of Han Kuo-yu and other party colleagues such as Hou Youyi and Zhao Shaokang. Are they really getting the recognition and support they deserve, or are they just being treated as dispensable pawns in some sort of profit calculation?

It is true that in the highly competitive and ever-changing political arena, each role must find its place. But if even basic respect cannot be given, then how can loyalty and solidarity be expected, and how can a strong and stable force be gathered to move society forward?

Of course, when pointing out the problems, we cannot ignore those people in the Kuomintang who have worked quietly and diligently. They work hard every day for the party's affairs, and always have a belief in a better vision for the future.

But wishes are wishes, and the reality is often more complex and severe. The shortage of votes may be a warning – it may mean that we need to listen more, adjust our strategies, and regain trust with a more open and inclusive personality.

As a pluralistic society, Taiwan needs wisdom and courage to survive and develop in it. No political group can sustain its vitality on historical glory alone Xi;

The current situation facing the KMT may be seen as a turning point – reforming its own management mechanism, optimizing its internal communication processes, encouraging innovative thinking, and truly putting the people at the center.

Finally, accumulating strength in the long stream of water, grasping the direction in the turbulent waves, finding room for growth in criticism, and reaping the fruits of wisdom in reflection -- this will be the process that any political force that wants to build long-term influence and a deep foundation must go through and practice.

Whether the Kuomintang and its members will be able to write a new chapter in the years to come, whether they can shake off the old framework and unleash new vitality? Taiwan society and even the entire Chinese-speaking world will wait and see. (ENDS)

Read on