laitimes

Tesla reproduced brake failure, the official / owner of the word, who should be trusted?

Recently, there is a video caused widespread circulation on the Internet, a Tesla car, on the Beijing Airport Expressway, an accident occurred, from the video, much like the previous netizens concerned about the "brake failure" reappeared, and soon after, Tesla official response to the matter said that the accident was caused by the owner accidentally stepping on the accelerator pedal.

Tesla reproduced brake failure, the official / owner of the word, who should be trusted?

After Tesla announced the results, I believe that many users and netizens will feel that perhaps the driver's driving experience is still shallow, and there are some uncontrollable emergencies when driving, resulting in this matter, after tesla's official announcement, I thought that this matter would be terminated from then on.

Owner testimony

After the incident and after Tesla's official announcement of the results, the owner began to describe the situation he encountered at the time of the accident in the discussion group of the social platform.

Tesla reproduced brake failure, the official / owner of the word, who should be trusted?

According to the owner's description, he is driving a Tesla model 3, when driving, without any warning, the vehicle suddenly opens to accelerate (vehicle automatic acceleration), the owner does not have time to think too much about the reason for acceleration, he opened the brake, according to the owner's description, the previous Tesla brake was very hard, but in this accident, Tesla's brake suddenly became very soft, and stepped on without any reaction.

Tesla reproduced brake failure, the official / owner of the word, who should be trusted?

According to the owner's description, the vehicle is not only a problem of brake failure, but also an unprovoked vehicle speed loss, automatically increasing the speed, in the combination of speed loss and brake failure, resulting in this accident.

Tesla reproduced brake failure, the official / owner of the word, who should be trusted?

According to previous network videos, only tesla model 3 was seen hitting a tank 300, but according to the owner's description, the car drove a kilometer, hit 4 cars in a row before stopping, and finally hit a Japanese car, and was also hit by the tesla model 3 driven by the owner almost scrapped.

Tesla reproduced brake failure, the official / owner of the word, who should be trusted?

The owner also said that the vehicle suddenly accelerated to 170km/h, coupled with the brake failure, because the air bag was opened, only to pick up a life.

The owner also said: Tesla's official explanation is that the owner stepped on the accelerator, but the owner himself said that as a 30-year-old driver, how can he be a kilometer away, and he has been stepping on the accelerator, and he also said that how can he not distinguish between the throttle and the brake?

After the owner expressed his views and remarks, the accident was pulled back into the public business.

Who should I trust?

Regarding Tesla's brake failure, there have been many reports of such accidents on the Internet.

On April 19, 2021, the Shanghai Auto Show opened, at the Tesla booth of this auto show, a woman, wearing a "brake failure" and equipped with Tesla logo clothes, stood directly on the roof of the on-site exhibition car, and shouted "Tesla brake failure", after which Tesla took the initiative to withdraw from the auto show industry.

Tesla reproduced brake failure, the official / owner of the word, who should be trusted?

This is also the first Tesla on the Internet to cause a huge sensation in the discussion of brake problems, from the 2021 Shanghai Auto Show, there have been many discussions on the Tesla brake problem on the Internet, because the current civilian car does not have an EDR system installed, there is no way to record the data at the time of the accident when the accident occurs, so many accident problems can not be solved by good notarization.

At present, every time after an accident, it is impossible to restore the course of events, and the two sides have their own opinions, and cannot be restored with the most real accident data, resulting in the identification of the rhythm of both sides on the network.

In this accident, the owner publicly stated that his operation did not have an "error", while the official said that the owner had "wrong operation" in the accident.

In such a game, who should users and consumers believe?

Read on