But anyone who has a little bit of basic knowledge of human ethics knows that car accidents, accidents and driving age have nothing to do with each other, and liars often take advantage of people's weaknesses in analysis to use technology to avoid their own problem risks.
For example, accidents, once there is a problem, they often say that they have a long driving age, and the accident is certainly not their own problem, and then a bunch of people jump out and stand in the circle drawn by the owner to analyze.
My wife has been taking her driver's license for 10 years, and she hasn't driven a car once in 10 years, and she ran out and told people that she had been driving for 10 years, and no one could confirm how her skills were.
So, is driving age after an accident evidence of innocence? Obviously not.
In the 2020 Wenzhou Tesla accident, the owner of the year vowed to everyone: I have 10 years of driving experience, and I absolutely cannot make the low-level mistake of using the throttle as a brake.
A year later, all the investigation data was in front of the eyes, the Wenzhou car owner was suspected of evading responsibility, and the data from both China and foreign sides confirmed the truth of the crash, that is, stepping on the wrong pedal.
I believe that the verdict in the Chinese market is legal and reasonable, because our tone is to use a large amount of data to support the facts, rather than believing a mouth of a car owner.
If what the owner says can be used as testimony, then what else do the traffic police and surveillance do?
Recently, another Tesla accident has been on the hot search, or the same words, the same reason: I have 30 years of driving experience, can I not know the brakes and throttle? I can tell the difference.
Then, the owner said:
The speed soon soared to 170km/h, the brakes were out of control, the vehicle inexplicably accelerated, and then I found that the brakes were getting softer and softer, and I had to burn incense two days after the accident.
A few questions:
1. Why are your brakes getting softer and softer? This is not at all like what the old driver said, the harder the brakes, I have been driving for 10 years to experience countless products, "fortunately" experienced a situation where the more and more soft the pedal, that is, the brake tubing fell off, and all the oil was lost.
2, your Tesla can crash four cars at a speed of 170km/h, even the front trunk has not been deformed, I am very skeptical about this speed first, in the end has it reached 170km/h?
If your car is 170km/h, the front car is calculated according to 110km/h, you also have a relative speed of 60km/h, what kind of crash can be made up for by yourself.
Some people say that up to a minute of time is accelerating, no one will step on the wrong minute, no one will step on the wrong minute.
That one-minute speed accelerated to 170km/h I think it is even more unreasonable, and anyone who has driven a Tesla knows that ten seconds is enough to accelerate to a very fast speed.
And there is also the most important point, when the brakes fail at high speed, the more you step on the softer, the faster you run, why can you use it afterwards? An accident knocked the brakes right?
Tesla's tough pry tactics in China, it is true that it does not talk about any friendship, we can reject and resist it, but we cannot hold this idea to resist the truth.
Is every word tesla owner said after the accident worth believing?
For Tesla owners, dumping the blame for the accident on Tesla brakes is the easiest way to get traffic and compassion, because too many people do it in exchange for the role of the so-called victim.
But is this really the case?
Fabricating lies is a very simple thing, debunking lies requires a lot of action, evidence, How Wenzhou Tesla owners swore that "I have 10 years of driving experience, I will not step on the wrong at all."
And finally? The truth is that he lied.
After Tesla braked this time, the owner of the car was also flashing his words before and after, did not firmly believe that he did not step on the wrong pedal, and also signed a "peace agreement" in a short period of time to solve the problem.
At the same time, Tesla's subsequent documents showed that the owner's own problem.
At the same time, the sober Han Lu also said that the simultaneous occurrence of brake failure and inexplicable acceleration is a very small probability of occurrence, if it is really a problem with the car, how can the owner allow himself to suffer the bitter fruit and bow to the problematic enterprise?
Instead, the owner said that Tesla's brakes failed on the one hand, and quickly closed the case on the other hand.
If there is really a grievance, I suggest that the owner and Tesla die to the end, after all, I believe in the lovely justice and fairness, will definitely stand on the side of the truth, not on the side of the so-called car owner weak.
Finally, I would like to say that not all car owners are honest, honest, and self-disciplined people in society.
Driving a Tesla is not the basis for an accident to throw the pot at yourself.