The $1.9 billion subsidy is simply not enough, Huawei's communication equipment, US operators can still dismantle it?
In the context of today's globalization, we should have worked together to create more cutting-edge technology, but there are always countries behind the scenes to make small moves, in a vain attempt to guide the development of global science and technology, resulting in the global scientific and technological development process being directly dragged down.
After the birth of Huawei 5G, it was restricted by European and American countries, and it was always unwilling to admit the fact that it had lagged behind, and many countries also made extreme choices to dismantle huawei equipment that had been built, which proved how stupid this practice was.
In addition to extending the progress of local 5G construction, but also wasted a lot of unnecessary resources, in order to promote the dismantling of Huawei equipment as soon as possible, the United States FCC came up with a subsidy of 1.9 billion US dollars, provided to operators as a demolition cost, but after the preliminary budget, the funds for comprehensive demolition have reached 5.6 billion US dollars, the amount of subsidies is simply not enough, operators are naturally unwilling, obviously can not be dismantled.
Too confident
The U.S. FCC still underestimates Huawei's influence too much, as early as the 4G era, U.S. operators and Huawei have carried out in-depth cooperation, almost every base station, contains Huawei equipment, although the $1.9 billion is not a small amount, but the actual cost of demolition is much higher than this number.
It has always been said that there are "security problems" in Huawei's equipment, and the United States naturally has to lead by example and take the lead in dismantling Huawei's equipment, but the extra part of the demolition cost, operators can not bear, operators as a profitable organization, how can it be possible to dismantle the equipment at the good end.
Moreover, this is only the cost of demolition, and the follow-up also needs a large number of replacement costs, and the operators themselves know that whether it is Nokia or Ericsson equipment, it is not as good as Huawei equipment, call them to spend money to replace, they must be able to drag on, spend money to find guilty things who are willing to do?
The declared amount far exceeded expectations
The FCC previously stated that operators can self-declare demolition costs, and also based on the data collected by 52 companies in the early stage, finalized the plan of on-demand distribution, and finally finalized the subsidy fund of 1.9 billion US dollars, but what was unexpected was that as of October last year, the number of declared operators was as high as 181, far exceeding the original estimate.
Finally, after the FCC's re-estimation, this fund has reached $5.6 billion, and the original estimate of $1.9 billion is simply not enough, this money has been gritted teeth to get out, and it is impossible to make up $5.6 billion.
Obviously, if the cost of dismantling the equipment is not in place, the operator will not rush to act, after all, the risk is to be borne by the enterprise itself, and 5.6 billion US dollars is not the final figure, with more and more units declared, the follow-up of this fund will certainly be ready to grow, lao Mei can still be dismantled?
Can U.S. operators still dismantle it?
The reality of the situation has been a big deviation from the FCC's estimates, want to continue to implement the plan to completely dismantle Huawei equipment, it is obviously impossible to achieve, the follow-up once the number of declared operators grows again, the existing funds are difficult to meet the needs of hundreds of enterprises, once caught in a dilemma, will directly affect the stability of the US local network.
At present, the only thing they can achieve is to gradually dismantle Huawei equipment, first finalize the implementation plan of several major operators, this subsidy funds as far as possible to meet them, and then for the remaining part of the operator, business restrictions and interference, forcing them to complete the replacement of equipment, which can save a lot of money, and this is also very in line with their consistent style.
The POPULATION OF THE US IMPERIALISM IS NOT MUCH, BUT THE PLACE IS STILL VERY LARGE, SO MANY RURAL AREAS HAVE INDEPENDENT OPERATORS, THEY ARE FORCED TO JOIN THE PLAN TO DISMANTLE HUAWEI EQUIPMENT, THEIR TURNOVER IS NOT VERY MUCH, IF THEY ARE ASKED TO REPLACE THE STABLE HUAWEI EQUIPMENT, THIS IS TANTAMOUNT TO PLAYING WITH FIRE AND SELF-IMMOLATION, IT IS CERTAIN THAT IF THE AMOUNT OF SUBSIDIES IS NOT IN PLACE, THEY WILL DEFINITELY NOT DO THIS KIND OF HARMING OTHERS AND DISADVANTAGES THEMSELVES.
It can't be dismantled anymore
The current 5G construction plan of the United States is roughly to build while demolishing, obviously in this way, even if the 5G network can be built, it may not be able to achieve the desired effect, and they have also abandoned the world's top Huawei equipment.
The current 5G base station is upgraded through the 4G base station, and Lao Mei adopts the way of demolition and construction, which will largely drag down the 5G construction process, can not supply the 5G network in time, and will also cause consumer dissatisfaction, once the operator loses confidence, the follow-up will be particularly difficult in 5G promotion.
Abandoning Huawei's cutting-edge equipment, can not ensure the stability of the 5G network well, there is no good user experience, when the operator is facing only the loss of the situation, so the demolition of Huawei equipment itself is a wrong choice, is they step by step to let themselves into a dilemma, what do you think about it?