Yesterday, I talked about a woman who was detained for defamation after posting that "the traffic police came out to make money again", but I didn't expect it to be such a coincidence, and today there are really law enforcement officers who "came out to make money" were exposed.
Heaven is a good reincarnation, who is spared by the sky, and the ironic effect is full.
Judging from the video taken by the driving record, the plot is like this:
A law enforcement officer stopped the car on the curve for inspection, but when the other person's car was about to slow down to the end, he actually jumped up to the front of the car, and then turned over and kept "whooping", as if he was seriously injured...... To be honest, in addition to being too unprofessional in "touching porcelain", it also exposes the rogue side.
What's even more interesting is that the reporter called to interview the local transportation bureau to find out the specific situation of this matter. As a result, the other party actually said that "it has been handled internally, and it is inconvenient to disclose the specifics......
In recent years, whenever there is negative news, it is inconvenient to disclose it. I'm just curious, you stop the car, what's inconvenient to disclose? When you touch porcelain, you move forward bravely, but now you are shy?
The reporter asked: Is it inconvenient for your people to disclose?
The other party replied: Yes, you should not have seen it.
This operation, how can it not be amazing. There was a problem with the official, and the response of "inconvenient disclosure" was already outrageous, but I didn't expect that even "whether it was someone from my own department" refused to express its position.
I thought that the village party secretary and the secretary of the political and legal committee had a look of "I don't understand the law" was already the limit, but I never expected that they would have new room for progress, which is really awesome. is three points more handsome than the heroic posture of the law enforcement officer jumping on the roof of the car.
I just don't know, does this count as making money?
"People's concern" said that now the reporter's phone call, the local transportation bureau has stopped answering.
As you can imagine, this is the reality. And if nothing else, it will soon be proven that the law enforcement officer is either an auxiliary police officer or a temporary worker, and then fined three glasses of wine, fired the person concerned, or suspended for criticism.
But what if it's ordinary people who "go wrong"? For example, the woman was arrested for just saying "I'm out to make money again". And people like this who wear law enforcement uniforms and still enforce the law are protected and told that it is "inconvenient to disclose", how ridiculous.
Of course, this kind of "short-term protection" may not be purely to protect the law enforcement officer who jumped into the front of the car, but more to save local face. Normal people know that without indicators and requirements, whether it is an auxiliary police or a traffic police with an establishment, there is no need to risk this kind of deed.
To put it bluntly, even if you touch porcelain, the money will not belong to you. They're more just here to complete the task metrics, because they're also the bottom of another world.
Other than that, the scariest point is the dash cam. I'm thinking, if it weren't for the fact that this amazing picture was clearly captured in the car, would this matter still be "touching porcelain"? What if the law enforcement officer insists that someone in the car broke the card?
In fact, the probability is very high, because he jumped on it for this purpose. And when that time comes, there will inevitably be a whole bunch of righteous angels who will stand up for the traffic police and describe the owners of the car as heinous.
When I think about it, my back is cold.