Observer Network quoted foreign media news "Huawei equipment to help Russia protect its Internet, from hackers from the West", this comment just reflects that Huawei's communication equipment is safe enough, so safe that it is difficult for Western hackers to break in, satirizing some Western media, why are they still hyping up Huawei's equipment insecurity before?
Due to well-known reasons, Huawei's communication equipment sales in the European market are facing obstacles, they accuse Huawei equipment of one reason is that its communication equipment is not secure, but so far they have not been able to find specific evidence of Huawei equipment insecurity, and even Germany, the United Kingdom and other relevant agencies in the in-depth investigation and research that Huawei equipment does not have security vulnerabilities.
Today, the performance of Huawei's communication equipment in Russia by foreign media has undoubtedly once again proved that Huawei's equipment is safe enough, highlighting the leading edge of Huawei equipment in technology.
Huawei has enough confidence in its own equipment, because it has invested heavily in technology research and development for many years, and the data in 2018 shows that Huawei's technology research and development investment ranks fifth in the world, and in recent years, its technology research and development investment has also remained at the forefront of global enterprise research and development investment.
Due to Huawei's long-term high investment in technology research and development, it has been able to maintain its leading edge in core technologies, according to the 5G core patent ranking data released by the analyst agency IPlytics, Huawei's 5G core patents rank first in the world, far ahead of Nokia and Ericsson.
Huawei's achievements today are not easy to come by, in 2000 and before, the communication equipment in the Chinese market can be described as seven countries and eight systems, the technical standards are different, the price is extremely expensive, the after-sales service cost is also very expensive, and the foreign communication equipment companies are still very untimely in terms of service.
Huawei at that time in terms of technology can not be compared with foreign enterprises, it seized the foreign communication equipment enterprises are reluctant to do business opportunities in rural areas, after all, the maintenance of base stations in rural areas is too hard, maintenance costs are high, Huawei took the rural market as an opportunity to successfully gain a foothold in the communication equipment market, through the way of rural encirclement of the city finally broke through the wall established by foreign communication equipment manufacturers in the domestic market.
Then Huawei seized the development opportunity of 3G-WCDMA technology, fully invested, made a breakthrough in WCDMA technology, when Europe began to build wCDMA networks, Huawei proposed distributed base station technology to open the situation in the European market with low cost, simple layout and other advantages, so that the European market became Huawei's largest overseas market, and then further expanded its share in the European communication equipment market in the 4G era.
Originally Huawei's accumulated years of technology research and development in the 5G era broke out, in the technology to completely obtain the leading edge of foreign communication equipment manufacturers, ready to further expand the market share, but for well-known reasons in the European market suffered setbacks, one of the reasons is technical security, but now the foreign media for huawei equipment performance in Russia, but just reflect how absurd their previous accusations are.
Their inconsistent comments on Huawei equipment reflect their double standards, puncture their previous lies of accusing Huawei equipment of being unsafe, which also highlights the strength of Chinese manufacturing today, China has become the world's largest manufacturing country for 12 consecutive years, ranking first in the world in 13 industries, and the accumulation over the years has gradually made breakthroughs in technology, and they should treat Chinese manufacturing more fairly.